KVM: SEV: Do cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host migrationgrafted

Manually perform cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host
migration to ensure no stale data is left in CPU caches after the VM is
destroyed.  Because the source VM is "converted" to a non-SEV VM, KVM's
memory reclaim flows won't trigger cache maintenance, e.g. when all guest
memory is reclaimed in response to detaching from the mmu_notifier.

Note, relying on the destination VM to do cache maintenance isn't an option
as KVM doesn't require identical guest memory configurations, i.e. the
source VM may have access to memory that the destination VM does not.
Enforcing equivalent memory configurations is infeasible, as it would
require a *deep* comparison of memslots, e.g. to verify that not only are
the memslot identical, but what the memslots point at is also identical.

Fixes: b56639318bb2 ("KVM: SEV: Add support for SEV intra host migration")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Stefan Teodorescu <fane@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20260923163721.1584779-3-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

3 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..825e899a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+ofdlocks
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..478e82f8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+TEST_GEN_PROGS := ofdlocks
+
+include ../lib.mk
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..68bac28b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include "kselftest.h"
+
+static int lock_set(int fd, struct flock *fl)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	fl->l_pid = 0;		// needed for OFD locks
+	fl->l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+	ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, fl);
+	if (ret)
+		ksft_perror("fcntl()");
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int lock_get(int fd, struct flock *fl)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	fl->l_pid = 0;		// needed for OFD locks
+	fl->l_whence = SEEK_SET;
+	ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_GETLK, fl);
+	if (ret)
+		ksft_perror("fcntl()");
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+	int rc;
+	struct flock fl, fl2;
+	int fd = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0600);
+	int fd2 = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDONLY);
+
+	ksft_print_header();
+	ksft_set_plan(4);
+
+	unlink("/tmp/aa");
+	assert(fd != -1);
+	assert(fd2 != -1);
+	ksft_print_msg("opened fds %i %i\n", fd, fd2);
+
+	/* Set some read lock */
+	fl.l_type = F_RDLCK;
+	fl.l_start = 5;
+	fl.l_len = 3;
+	rc = lock_set(fd, &fl);
+	ksft_test_result(rc == 0, "set OFD read lock on first fd\n");
+	if (rc != 0)
+		ksft_finished();
+
+	/* Make sure read locks do not conflict on different fds. */
+	fl.l_type = F_RDLCK;
+	fl.l_start = 5;
+	fl.l_len = 1;
+	rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl);
+	if (rc != 0)
+		ksft_finished();
+	if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK)
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg("read locks conflicted\n");
+
+	/* Make sure read/write locks do conflict on different fds. */
+	fl.l_type = F_WRLCK;
+	fl.l_start = 5;
+	fl.l_len = 1;
+	rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl);
+	if (rc != 0)
+		ksft_finished();
+	ksft_test_result(fl.l_type != F_UNLCK,
+			 "read and write locks conflicted\n");
+	if (fl.l_type == F_UNLCK)
+		ksft_finished();
+
+	/* Get info about the lock on first fd. */
+	fl.l_type = F_UNLCK;
+	fl.l_start = 5;
+	fl.l_len = 1;
+	rc = lock_get(fd, &fl);
+	if (rc != 0)
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg("F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n");
+	ksft_test_result(fl.l_type != F_UNLCK,
+			 "F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK returned lock info\n");
+	if (fl.l_type == F_UNLCK)
+		ksft_exit_fail();
+	ksft_print_msg("F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n",
+		       fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len);
+
+	/* Try the same but by locking everything by len==0. */
+	fl2.l_type = F_UNLCK;
+	fl2.l_start = 0;
+	fl2.l_len = 0;
+	rc = lock_get(fd, &fl2);
+	if (rc != 0)
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg
+		    ("F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n");
+	ksft_test_result(memcmp(&fl, &fl2, sizeof(fl)) == 0,
+			 "F_UNLCK with len==0 returned the same\n");
+	if (memcmp(&fl, &fl2, sizeof(fl))) {
+		ksft_exit_fail_msg
+		    ("F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n",
+		     fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len);
+	}
+
+	/* Get info about the lock on second fd - no locks on it. */
+	fl.l_type = F_UNLCK;
+	fl.l_start = 0;
+	fl.l_len = 0;
+	lock_get(fd2, &fl);
+	ksft_test_result(fl.l_type == F_UNLCK,
+			 "F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK return lock info from another fd\n");
+
+	ksft_finished();
+}