diff options
| author | Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> | 2026-09-04 10:43:19 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2026-09-04 07:58:36 -0700 |
| commit | 6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722 (patch) | |
| tree | 58e8288fead484f6755ad0815fc74c3742663761 /tools/testing/selftests/filelock | |
| download | linux-stable-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.tar.gz linux-stable-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.zip | |
selftests/bpf: Reject graph kptr use after RCU unlockgrafted
Add a sleepable verifier test that loads a graph-node local kptr in an
explicit RCU read-side critical section, then passes its node to
bpf_rbtree_remove() after the section ends.
Before the verifier fix, the stale NON_OWN_REF flag makes the node look like
a live borrowed reference and the program is accepted. After the fix, the
pointer is demoted without NON_OWN_REF and the graph kfunc argument is
rejected.
Also exercise a graph kptr loaded while a spin lock provides implicit RCU
protection. The pointer must be invalidated when the lock is released, which
guards the required ordering between non-owning-reference invalidation and
RCU demotion.
Update the existing fault-protected load test state description. The
post-unlock pointer no longer carries NON_OWN_REF, but remains readable
because the load is rewritten to use BPF_PROBE_MEM.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904084325.52250-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/filelock')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/filelock/.gitignore | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c | 120 |
3 files changed, 126 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000000000..825e899a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ofdlocks diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000..478e82f8b --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +TEST_GEN_PROGS := ofdlocks + +include ../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..68bac28b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/filelock/ofdlocks.c @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#define _GNU_SOURCE +#include <fcntl.h> +#include <assert.h> +#include <stdio.h> +#include <unistd.h> +#include <string.h> +#include "kselftest.h" + +static int lock_set(int fd, struct flock *fl) +{ + int ret; + + fl->l_pid = 0; // needed for OFD locks + fl->l_whence = SEEK_SET; + ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_SETLK, fl); + if (ret) + ksft_perror("fcntl()"); + return ret; +} + +static int lock_get(int fd, struct flock *fl) +{ + int ret; + + fl->l_pid = 0; // needed for OFD locks + fl->l_whence = SEEK_SET; + ret = fcntl(fd, F_OFD_GETLK, fl); + if (ret) + ksft_perror("fcntl()"); + return ret; +} + +int main(void) +{ + int rc; + struct flock fl, fl2; + int fd = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0600); + int fd2 = open("/tmp/aa", O_RDONLY); + + ksft_print_header(); + ksft_set_plan(4); + + unlink("/tmp/aa"); + assert(fd != -1); + assert(fd2 != -1); + ksft_print_msg("opened fds %i %i\n", fd, fd2); + + /* Set some read lock */ + fl.l_type = F_RDLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 3; + rc = lock_set(fd, &fl); + ksft_test_result(rc == 0, "set OFD read lock on first fd\n"); + if (rc != 0) + ksft_finished(); + + /* Make sure read locks do not conflict on different fds. */ + fl.l_type = F_RDLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl); + if (rc != 0) + ksft_finished(); + if (fl.l_type != F_UNLCK) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("read locks conflicted\n"); + + /* Make sure read/write locks do conflict on different fds. */ + fl.l_type = F_WRLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd2, &fl); + if (rc != 0) + ksft_finished(); + ksft_test_result(fl.l_type != F_UNLCK, + "read and write locks conflicted\n"); + if (fl.l_type == F_UNLCK) + ksft_finished(); + + /* Get info about the lock on first fd. */ + fl.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl.l_start = 5; + fl.l_len = 1; + rc = lock_get(fd, &fl); + if (rc != 0) + ksft_exit_fail_msg("F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n"); + ksft_test_result(fl.l_type != F_UNLCK, + "F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK returned lock info\n"); + if (fl.l_type == F_UNLCK) + ksft_exit_fail(); + ksft_print_msg("F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n", + fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len); + + /* Try the same but by locking everything by len==0. */ + fl2.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl2.l_start = 0; + fl2.l_len = 0; + rc = lock_get(fd, &fl2); + if (rc != 0) + ksft_exit_fail_msg + ("F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK not supported\n"); + ksft_test_result(memcmp(&fl, &fl2, sizeof(fl)) == 0, + "F_UNLCK with len==0 returned the same\n"); + if (memcmp(&fl, &fl2, sizeof(fl))) { + ksft_exit_fail_msg + ("F_UNLCK test returns: locked, type %i pid %i len %zi\n", + fl.l_type, fl.l_pid, fl.l_len); + } + + /* Get info about the lock on second fd - no locks on it. */ + fl.l_type = F_UNLCK; + fl.l_start = 0; + fl.l_len = 0; + lock_get(fd2, &fl); + ksft_test_result(fl.l_type == F_UNLCK, + "F_OFD_GETLK with F_UNLCK return lock info from another fd\n"); + + ksft_finished(); +} |
