summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/perf/util/target.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /tools/perf/util/target.c
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/util/target.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/perf/util/target.c142
1 files changed, 142 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/target.c b/tools/perf/util/target.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8cf71bea2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/util/target.c
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Helper functions for handling target threads/cpus
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2012, LG Electronics, Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
+ */
+
+#include "target.h"
+
+#include <pwd.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+
+enum target_errno target__validate(struct target *target)
+{
+ enum target_errno ret = TARGET_ERRNO__SUCCESS;
+
+ if (target->pid)
+ target->tid = target->pid;
+
+ /* CPU and PID are mutually exclusive */
+ if (target->tid && target->cpu_list) {
+ target->cpu_list = NULL;
+ if (ret == TARGET_ERRNO__SUCCESS)
+ ret = TARGET_ERRNO__PID_OVERRIDE_CPU;
+ }
+
+ /* PID and SYSTEM are mutually exclusive */
+ if (target->tid && target->system_wide) {
+ target->system_wide = false;
+ if (ret == TARGET_ERRNO__SUCCESS)
+ ret = TARGET_ERRNO__PID_OVERRIDE_SYSTEM;
+ }
+
+ /* BPF and CPU are mutually exclusive */
+ if (target->bpf_str && target->cpu_list) {
+ target->cpu_list = NULL;
+ if (ret == TARGET_ERRNO__SUCCESS)
+ ret = TARGET_ERRNO__BPF_OVERRIDE_CPU;
+ }
+
+ /* BPF and PID/TID are mutually exclusive */
+ if (target->bpf_str && target->tid) {
+ target->tid = NULL;
+ if (ret == TARGET_ERRNO__SUCCESS)
+ ret = TARGET_ERRNO__BPF_OVERRIDE_PID;
+ }
+
+ /* BPF and THREADS are mutually exclusive */
+ if (target->bpf_str && target->per_thread) {
+ target->per_thread = false;
+ if (ret == TARGET_ERRNO__SUCCESS)
+ ret = TARGET_ERRNO__BPF_OVERRIDE_THREAD;
+ }
+
+ /* THREAD and SYSTEM/CPU are mutually exclusive */
+ if (target->per_thread && (target->system_wide || target->cpu_list)) {
+ target->per_thread = false;
+ if (ret == TARGET_ERRNO__SUCCESS)
+ ret = TARGET_ERRNO__SYSTEM_OVERRIDE_THREAD;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+uid_t parse_uid(const char *str)
+{
+ struct passwd pwd, *result;
+ char buf[1024];
+
+ if (str == NULL)
+ return UINT_MAX;
+
+ /* Try user name first */
+ getpwnam_r(str, &pwd, buf, sizeof(buf), &result);
+
+ if (result == NULL) {
+ /*
+ * The user name not found. Maybe it's a UID number.
+ */
+ char *endptr;
+ int uid = strtol(str, &endptr, 10);
+
+ if (*endptr != '\0')
+ return UINT_MAX;
+
+ getpwuid_r(uid, &pwd, buf, sizeof(buf), &result);
+
+ if (result == NULL)
+ return UINT_MAX;
+ }
+
+ return result->pw_uid;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This must have a same ordering as the enum target_errno.
+ */
+static const char *target__error_str[] = {
+ "PID/TID switch overriding CPU",
+ "PID/TID switch overriding SYSTEM",
+ "SYSTEM/CPU switch overriding PER-THREAD",
+ "BPF switch overriding CPU",
+ "BPF switch overriding PID/TID",
+ "BPF switch overriding THREAD",
+};
+
+int target__strerror(struct target *target __maybe_unused, int errnum,
+ char *buf, size_t buflen)
+{
+ int idx;
+ const char *msg;
+
+ BUG_ON(buflen == 0);
+
+ if (errnum >= 0) {
+ str_error_r(errnum, buf, buflen);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (errnum < __TARGET_ERRNO__START || errnum >= __TARGET_ERRNO__END)
+ return -1;
+
+ idx = errnum - __TARGET_ERRNO__START;
+ msg = target__error_str[idx];
+
+ switch (errnum) {
+ case TARGET_ERRNO__PID_OVERRIDE_CPU ...
+ TARGET_ERRNO__BPF_OVERRIDE_THREAD:
+ snprintf(buf, buflen, "%s", msg);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ /* cannot reach here */
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}