summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>2026-09-02 09:55:01 -0400
committerSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>2026-09-02 11:08:21 -0400
commit4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5 (patch)
tree350aa83b47da0b574a814795392b20b0bed83cbc /tools/perf/util/strbuf.c
downloadlinux-stable-4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5.tar.gz
linux-stable-4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5.zip
ftrace: Synchronize the initialization of ftrace_opsgrafted
There's some internal state that ftrace_ops needs to have set, but since it can be declared outside of the ftrace.c code, it calls ftrace_ops_init() on the ops in every global function. The issue is that if two tasks call it on the same ops at the same time it is possible to have the initialization of one corrupt the initialization of the other call. Create a ops_mutex to use to synchronize every initialization of the ftrace_ops. The mutex is taken within checking the ftrace_ops flag that states it was initializied but the flag is checked again after the mutex has been taken. Checking first outside the mutex allows it to shortcut having to take the mutex. But then the check needs to be done again after the mute is taken in case of races. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260902095501.6b59af20@gandalf.local.home Fixes: f04f24fb7e48d ("ftrace, kprobes: Fix a deadlock on ftrace_regex_lock") Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829025528.49A831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/util/strbuf.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/perf/util/strbuf.c170
1 files changed, 170 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c b/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a64a37628
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/util/strbuf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include "cache.h"
+#include "debug.h"
+#include "strbuf.h"
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/zalloc.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+/*
+ * Used as the default ->buf value, so that people can always assume
+ * buf is non NULL and ->buf is NUL terminated even for a freshly
+ * initialized strbuf.
+ */
+char strbuf_slopbuf[1];
+
+int strbuf_init(struct strbuf *sb, ssize_t hint)
+{
+ sb->alloc = sb->len = 0;
+ sb->buf = strbuf_slopbuf;
+ if (hint)
+ return strbuf_grow(sb, hint);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void strbuf_release(struct strbuf *sb)
+{
+ if (sb->alloc) {
+ zfree(&sb->buf);
+ strbuf_init(sb, 0);
+ }
+}
+
+char *strbuf_detach(struct strbuf *sb, size_t *sz)
+{
+ char *res = sb->alloc ? sb->buf : NULL;
+ if (sz)
+ *sz = sb->len;
+ strbuf_init(sb, 0);
+ return res;
+}
+
+int strbuf_grow(struct strbuf *sb, size_t extra)
+{
+ char *buf;
+ size_t nr = sb->len + extra + 1;
+
+ if (nr < sb->alloc)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (nr <= sb->len)
+ return -E2BIG;
+
+ if (alloc_nr(sb->alloc) > nr)
+ nr = alloc_nr(sb->alloc);
+
+ /*
+ * Note that sb->buf == strbuf_slopbuf if sb->alloc == 0, and it is
+ * a static variable. Thus we have to avoid passing it to realloc.
+ */
+ buf = realloc(sb->alloc ? sb->buf : NULL, nr * sizeof(*buf));
+ if (!buf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ sb->buf = buf;
+ sb->alloc = nr;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int strbuf_addch(struct strbuf *sb, int c)
+{
+ int ret = strbuf_grow(sb, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ sb->buf[sb->len++] = c;
+ sb->buf[sb->len] = '\0';
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int strbuf_add(struct strbuf *sb, const void *data, size_t len)
+{
+ int ret = strbuf_grow(sb, len);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ memcpy(sb->buf + sb->len, data, len);
+ return strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + len);
+}
+
+static int strbuf_addv(struct strbuf *sb, const char *fmt, va_list ap)
+{
+ int len, ret;
+ va_list ap_saved;
+
+ if (!strbuf_avail(sb)) {
+ ret = strbuf_grow(sb, 64);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ va_copy(ap_saved, ap);
+ len = vsnprintf(sb->buf + sb->len, sb->alloc - sb->len, fmt, ap);
+ if (len < 0) {
+ va_end(ap_saved);
+ return len;
+ }
+ if (len > strbuf_avail(sb)) {
+ ret = strbuf_grow(sb, len);
+ if (ret) {
+ va_end(ap_saved);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ len = vsnprintf(sb->buf + sb->len, sb->alloc - sb->len, fmt, ap_saved);
+ if (len > strbuf_avail(sb)) {
+ pr_debug("this should not happen, your vsnprintf is broken");
+ va_end(ap_saved);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+ va_end(ap_saved);
+ return strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + len);
+}
+
+int strbuf_addf(struct strbuf *sb, const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ va_list ap;
+ int ret;
+
+ va_start(ap, fmt);
+ ret = strbuf_addv(sb, fmt, ap);
+ va_end(ap);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+ssize_t strbuf_read(struct strbuf *sb, int fd, ssize_t hint)
+{
+ size_t oldlen = sb->len;
+ size_t oldalloc = sb->alloc;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = strbuf_grow(sb, hint ? hint : 8192);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ for (;;) {
+ ssize_t cnt;
+
+ cnt = read(fd, sb->buf + sb->len, sb->alloc - sb->len - 1);
+ if (cnt < 0) {
+ if (oldalloc == 0)
+ strbuf_release(sb);
+ else
+ strbuf_setlen(sb, oldlen);
+ return cnt;
+ }
+ if (!cnt)
+ break;
+ sb->len += cnt;
+ ret = strbuf_grow(sb, 8192);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ sb->buf[sb->len] = '\0';
+ return sb->len - oldlen;
+}