treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted

This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc()
family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci

This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first
kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the
first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h
scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's
"--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped
to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control
flow indicator I could find.

Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc,
riscv, and s390 with no new warnings.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1]
Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 257 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/time-utils-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/time-utils-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..90a9a4b4f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/time-utils-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/time64.h>
+#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include "time-utils.h"
+#include "evlist.h"
+#include "session.h"
+#include "debug.h"
+#include "tests.h"
+
+static bool test__parse_nsec_time(const char *str, u64 expected)
+{
+	u64 ptime;
+	int err;
+
+	pr_debug("\nparse_nsec_time(\"%s\")\n", str);
+
+	err = parse_nsec_time(str, &ptime);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_debug("error %d\n", err);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (ptime != expected) {
+		pr_debug("Failed. ptime %" PRIu64 " expected %" PRIu64 "\n",
+			 ptime, expected);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	pr_debug("%" PRIu64 "\n", ptime);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static bool test__perf_time__parse_str(const char *ostr, u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+	struct perf_time_interval ptime;
+	int err;
+
+	pr_debug("\nperf_time__parse_str(\"%s\")\n", ostr);
+
+	err = perf_time__parse_str(&ptime, ostr);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_debug("Error %d\n", err);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	if (ptime.start != start || ptime.end != end) {
+		pr_debug("Failed. Expected %" PRIu64 " to %" PRIu64 "\n",
+			 start, end);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+#define TEST_MAX 64
+
+struct test_data {
+	const char *str;
+	u64 first;
+	u64 last;
+	struct perf_time_interval ptime[TEST_MAX];
+	int num;
+	u64 skip[TEST_MAX];
+	u64 noskip[TEST_MAX];
+};
+
+static bool test__perf_time__parse_for_ranges(struct test_data *d)
+{
+	struct evlist *evlist = evlist__new();
+	struct perf_session session = { .evlist = evlist };
+	struct perf_time_interval *ptime = NULL;
+	int range_size, range_num;
+	bool pass = false;
+	int i, err;
+
+	if (!evlist) {
+		pr_debug("Missing evlist\n");
+		return false;
+	}
+	evlist__set_first_sample_time(evlist, d->first);
+	evlist__set_last_sample_time(evlist, d->last);
+	pr_debug("\nperf_time__parse_for_ranges(\"%s\")\n", d->str);
+
+	if (strchr(d->str, '%'))
+		pr_debug("first_sample_time %" PRIu64 " last_sample_time %" PRIu64 "\n",
+			 d->first, d->last);
+
+	err = perf_time__parse_for_ranges(d->str, &session, &ptime, &range_size,
+					  &range_num);
+	if (err) {
+		pr_debug("error %d\n", err);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (range_size < d->num || range_num != d->num) {
+		pr_debug("bad size: range_size %d range_num %d expected num %d\n",
+			 range_size, range_num, d->num);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < d->num; i++) {
+		if (ptime[i].start != d->ptime[i].start ||
+		    ptime[i].end != d->ptime[i].end) {
+			pr_debug("bad range %d expected %" PRIu64 " to %" PRIu64 "\n",
+				 i, d->ptime[i].start, d->ptime[i].end);
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(ptime, d->num, 0)) {
+		pr_debug("failed to keep 0\n");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < TEST_MAX; i++) {
+		if (d->skip[i] &&
+		    !perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(ptime, d->num, d->skip[i])) {
+			pr_debug("failed to skip %" PRIu64 "\n", d->skip[i]);
+			goto out;
+		}
+		if (d->noskip[i] &&
+		    perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(ptime, d->num, d->noskip[i])) {
+			pr_debug("failed to keep %" PRIu64 "\n", d->noskip[i]);
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
+	pass = true;
+out:
+	evlist__put(evlist);
+	free(ptime);
+	return pass;
+}
+
+static int test__time_utils(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
+{
+	bool pass = true;
+
+	pass &= test__parse_nsec_time("0", 0);
+	pass &= test__parse_nsec_time("1", 1000000000ULL);
+	pass &= test__parse_nsec_time("0.000000001", 1);
+	pass &= test__parse_nsec_time("1.000000001", 1000000001ULL);
+	pass &= test__parse_nsec_time("123456.123456", 123456123456000ULL);
+	pass &= test__parse_nsec_time("1234567.123456789", 1234567123456789ULL);
+	pass &= test__parse_nsec_time("18446744073.709551615",
+				      0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL);
+
+	pass &= test__perf_time__parse_str("1234567.123456789,1234567.123456789",
+					   1234567123456789ULL, 1234567123456789ULL);
+	pass &= test__perf_time__parse_str("1234567.123456789,1234567.123456790",
+					   1234567123456789ULL, 1234567123456790ULL);
+	pass &= test__perf_time__parse_str("1234567.123456789,",
+					   1234567123456789ULL, 0);
+	pass &= test__perf_time__parse_str(",1234567.123456789",
+					   0, 1234567123456789ULL);
+	pass &= test__perf_time__parse_str("0,1234567.123456789",
+					   0, 1234567123456789ULL);
+
+	{
+		u64 b = 1234567123456789ULL;
+		struct test_data d = {
+			.str   = "1234567.123456789,1234567.123456790",
+			.ptime = { {b, b + 1}, },
+			.num = 1,
+			.skip = { b - 1, b + 2, },
+			.noskip = { b, b + 1, },
+		};
+
+		pass &= test__perf_time__parse_for_ranges(&d);
+	}
+
+	{
+		u64 b = 1234567123456789ULL;
+		u64 c = 7654321987654321ULL;
+		u64 e = 8000000000000000ULL;
+		struct test_data d = {
+			.str   = "1234567.123456789,1234567.123456790 "
+				 "7654321.987654321,7654321.987654444 "
+				 "8000000,8000000.000000005",
+			.ptime = { {b, b + 1}, {c, c + 123}, {e, e + 5}, },
+			.num = 3,
+			.skip = { b - 1, b + 2, c - 1, c + 124, e - 1, e + 6 },
+			.noskip = { b, b + 1, c, c + 123, e, e + 5 },
+		};
+
+		pass &= test__perf_time__parse_for_ranges(&d);
+	}
+
+	{
+		u64 b = 7654321ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+		struct test_data d = {
+			.str    = "10%/1",
+			.first  = b,
+			.last   = b + 100,
+			.ptime  = { {b, b + 9}, },
+			.num    = 1,
+			.skip   = { b - 1, b + 10, },
+			.noskip = { b, b + 9, },
+		};
+
+		pass &= test__perf_time__parse_for_ranges(&d);
+	}
+
+	{
+		u64 b = 7654321ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+		struct test_data d = {
+			.str    = "10%/2",
+			.first  = b,
+			.last   = b + 100,
+			.ptime  = { {b + 10, b + 19}, },
+			.num    = 1,
+			.skip   = { b + 9, b + 20, },
+			.noskip = { b + 10, b + 19, },
+		};
+
+		pass &= test__perf_time__parse_for_ranges(&d);
+	}
+
+	{
+		u64 b = 11223344ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+		struct test_data d = {
+			.str    = "10%/1,10%/2",
+			.first  = b,
+			.last   = b + 100,
+			.ptime  = { {b, b + 9}, {b + 10, b + 19}, },
+			.num    = 2,
+			.skip   = { b - 1, b + 20, },
+			.noskip = { b, b + 8, b + 9, b + 10, b + 11, b + 12, b + 19, },
+		};
+
+		pass &= test__perf_time__parse_for_ranges(&d);
+	}
+
+	{
+		u64 b = 11223344ULL * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+		struct test_data d = {
+			.str    = "10%/1,10%/3,10%/10",
+			.first  = b,
+			.last   = b + 100,
+			.ptime  = { {b, b + 9}, {b + 20, b + 29}, { b + 90, b + 100}, },
+			.num    = 3,
+			.skip   = { b - 1, b + 10, b + 19, b + 30, b + 89, b + 101 },
+			.noskip = { b, b + 9, b + 20, b + 29, b + 90, b + 100},
+		};
+
+		pass &= test__perf_time__parse_for_ranges(&d);
+	}
+
+	pr_debug("\n");
+
+	return pass ? 0 : TEST_FAIL;
+}
+
+DEFINE_SUITE("time utils", time_utils);