ARM: 9485/1: mm: acquire mmap write lock around show_pte() for user faultsgrafted

When CONFIG_DEBUG_USER=y, and cmdline "user_debug=31" is set,
a user fault may trigger show_pte() without any lock.
If another thread in the same process concurrently calls munmap(),
the page table pages may be freed while show_pte() is still traversing
them, causing a use-after-free in show_pte().

If CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, this may cause a kernel panic if the pages table
of PMD are freed when show_pte() is running.

Acquire mmap_write_lock() around show_pte() for user faults to fix the
contention.

For user faults, additionally restrict that show_pte() is called only
when the addr is a user-space address (addr < TASK_SIZE). This is because
the lock of tsk->mm only protects the virtual memory of user address space,
furthermore, dumping the page tables of a kernel-space address for user
faults is unnecessary and may have security implications.

Keep everything unchanged for kernel faults, because the kernel is
already in the "oops" state, acquiring a lock may risk a deadlock.

Co-developed-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>

Fixes: 6d021b724481 ("ARM: dump pgd, pmd and pte states on unhandled data abort faults")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260716014022.2823-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c b/tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e7adf60be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bitmap.c
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/bitmap.h>
+#include <perf/cpumap.h>
+#include <internal/cpumap.h>
+#include "tests.h"
+#include "debug.h"
+
+#define NBITS 100
+
+static unsigned long *get_bitmap(const char *str, int nbits)
+{
+	struct perf_cpu_map *map = perf_cpu_map__new(str);
+	unsigned long *bm;
+
+	bm = bitmap_zalloc(nbits);
+
+	if (map && bm) {
+		unsigned int i;
+		struct perf_cpu cpu;
+
+		perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, i, map)
+			__set_bit(cpu.cpu, bm);
+	}
+
+	perf_cpu_map__put(map);
+	return bm;
+}
+
+static int test_bitmap(const char *str)
+{
+	unsigned long *bm = get_bitmap(str, NBITS);
+	char buf[100];
+	int ret;
+
+	bitmap_scnprintf(bm, NBITS, buf, sizeof(buf));
+	pr_debug("bitmap: %s\n", buf);
+
+	ret = !strcmp(buf, str);
+	free(bm);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int test__bitmap_print(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
+{
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to convert map", test_bitmap("1"));
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to convert map", test_bitmap("1,5"));
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to convert map", test_bitmap("1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21-40"));
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to convert map", test_bitmap("2-5"));
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to convert map", test_bitmap("1,3-6,8-10,24,35-37"));
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to convert map", test_bitmap("1,3-6,8-10,24,35-37"));
+	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("failed to convert map", test_bitmap("1-10,12-20,22-30,32-40"));
+	return 0;
+}
+
+DEFINE_SUITE("Print bitmap", bitmap_print);