diff options
| author | Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com> | 2026-08-24 01:18:14 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> | 2026-08-23 22:12:11 +0200 |
| commit | 2bd30b8dc75b823dd7bbef9d7bc68e1fd7ecee5c (patch) | |
| tree | dcc4da1d99f17541c5590ac63c77da4bf372a4ab /tools/include/uapi/README | |
| download | linux-stable-2bd30b8dc75b823dd7bbef9d7bc68e1fd7ecee5c.tar.gz linux-stable-2bd30b8dc75b823dd7bbef9d7bc68e1fd7ecee5c.zip | |
coccinelle: alloc_cast: drop removed allocatorsgrafted
- pci_alloc_consistent() and pci_zalloc_consistent() were removed by
commit 7968778914e5
("PCI: Remove the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API")
- kmem_alloc() was removed by commit f078d4ea8276
("xfs: convert kmem_alloc() to kmalloc()")
- kmem_zalloc() was removed by commit 10634530f7ba
("xfs: convert kmem_zalloc() to kzalloc()")
- kmem_zone_alloc() and kmem_zone_zalloc() were removed by commit
bae633a4a283 ("xfs: remove xfs_zone_{alloc,zalloc} helpers")
So drop them from the rules.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Sang-Heon Jeon <ekffu200098@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/include/uapi/README')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/include/uapi/README | 73 |
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/README b/tools/include/uapi/README new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7147b1b2c --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/include/uapi/README @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +Why we want a copy of kernel headers in tools? +============================================== + +There used to be no copies, with tools/ code using kernel headers +directly. From time to time tools/perf/ broke due to legitimate kernel +hacking. At some point Linus complained about such direct usage. Then we +adopted the current model. + +The way these headers are used in perf are not restricted to just +including them to compile something. + +There are sometimes used in scripts that convert defines into string +tables, etc, so some change may break one of these scripts, or new MSRs +may use some different #define pattern, etc. + +E.g.: + + $ ls -1 tools/perf/trace/beauty/*.sh | head -5 + tools/perf/trace/beauty/arch_errno_names.sh + tools/perf/trace/beauty/drm_ioctl.sh + tools/perf/trace/beauty/fadvise.sh + tools/perf/trace/beauty/fsconfig.sh + tools/perf/trace/beauty/fsmount.sh + $ + $ tools/perf/trace/beauty/fadvise.sh + static const char *fadvise_advices[] = { + [0] = "NORMAL", + [1] = "RANDOM", + [2] = "SEQUENTIAL", + [3] = "WILLNEED", + [4] = "DONTNEED", + [5] = "NOREUSE", + }; + $ + +The tools/perf/check-headers.sh script, part of the tools/ build +process, points out changes in the original files. + +So its important not to touch the copies in tools/ when doing changes in +the original kernel headers, that will be done later, when +check-headers.sh inform about the change to the perf tools hackers. + +Another explanation from Ingo Molnar: +It's better than all the alternatives we tried so far: + + - Symbolic links and direct #includes: this was the original approach but + was pushed back on from the kernel side, when tooling modified the + headers and broke them accidentally for kernel builds. + + - Duplicate self-defined ABI headers like glibc: double the maintenance + burden, double the chance for mistakes, plus there's no tech-driven + notification mechanism to look at new kernel side changes. + +What we are doing now is a third option: + + - A software-enforced copy-on-write mechanism of kernel headers to + tooling, driven by non-fatal warnings on the tooling side build when + kernel headers get modified: + + Warning: Kernel ABI header differences: + diff -u tools/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h + diff -u tools/include/uapi/linux/fs.h include/uapi/linux/fs.h + diff -u tools/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h include/uapi/linux/kvm.h + ... + + The tooling policy is to always pick up the kernel side headers as-is, + and integate them into the tooling build. The warnings above serve as a + notification to tooling maintainers that there's changes on the kernel + side. + +We've been using this for many years now, and it might seem hacky, but +works surprisingly well. + |
