kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted

Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:

    vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
    can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd

The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.

This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.

Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.

Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 77 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/samples/seccomp/dropper.c b/samples/seccomp/dropper.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4bca4b70f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/samples/seccomp/dropper.c
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Naive system call dropper built on seccomp_filter.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2012 The Chromium OS Authors <chromium-os-dev@chromium.org>
+ * Author: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
+ *
+ * The code may be used by anyone for any purpose,
+ * and can serve as a starting point for developing
+ * applications using prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 2, ...).
+ *
+ * When run, returns the specified errno for the specified
+ * system call number against the given architecture.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <linux/audit.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+#include <linux/seccomp.h>
+#include <linux/unistd.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+static int install_filter(int arch, int nr, int error)
+{
+	struct sock_filter filter[] = {
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS,
+			 (offsetof(struct seccomp_data, arch))),
+		BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, arch, 0, 3),
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_LD+BPF_W+BPF_ABS,
+			 (offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr))),
+		BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP+BPF_JEQ+BPF_K, nr, 0, 1),
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K,
+			 SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO|(error & SECCOMP_RET_DATA)),
+		BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
+	};
+	struct sock_fprog prog = {
+		.len = (unsigned short)(sizeof(filter)/sizeof(filter[0])),
+		.filter = filter,
+	};
+	if (error == -1) {
+		struct sock_filter kill = BPF_STMT(BPF_RET+BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL);
+		filter[4] = kill;
+	}
+	if (prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0)) {
+		perror("prctl(NO_NEW_PRIVS)");
+		return 1;
+	}
+	if (prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 2, &prog)) {
+		perror("prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP)");
+		return 1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	if (argc < 5) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Usage:\n"
+			"dropper <arch> <syscall_nr> <errno> <prog> [<args>]\n"
+			"Hint:	AUDIT_ARCH_I386: 0x%X\n"
+			"	AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64: 0x%X\n"
+			"	errno == -1 means SECCOMP_RET_KILL\n"
+			"\n", AUDIT_ARCH_I386, AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64);
+		return 1;
+	}
+	if (install_filter(strtol(argv[1], NULL, 0), strtol(argv[2], NULL, 0),
+			   strtol(argv[3], NULL, 0)))
+		return 1;
+	execv(argv[4], &argv[4]);
+	printf("Failed to execv\n");
+	return 255;
+}