kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted

Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:

    vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
    can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd

The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.

This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.

Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.

Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 85 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c b/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ba86a60a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+/*
+ * Simple tool to set SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE, SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE,
+ * before executing a command.
+ *
+ * Copyright © 2024 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#define __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <linux/prctl.h>
+#include <linux/securebits.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+static void print_usage(const char *argv0)
+{
+	fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s -f|-i -- <cmd> [args]...\n\n", argv0);
+	fprintf(stderr, "Execute a command with\n");
+	fprintf(stderr, "- SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE set: -f\n");
+	fprintf(stderr, "- SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE set: -i\n");
+}
+
+int main(const int argc, char *const argv[], char *const *const envp)
+{
+	const char *cmd_path;
+	char *const *cmd_argv;
+	int opt, secbits_cur, secbits_new;
+	bool has_policy = false;
+
+	secbits_cur = prctl(PR_GET_SECUREBITS);
+	if (secbits_cur == -1) {
+		/*
+		 * This should never happen, except with a buggy seccomp
+		 * filter.
+		 */
+		perror("ERROR: Failed to get securebits");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	secbits_new = secbits_cur;
+	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "fi")) != -1) {
+		switch (opt) {
+		case 'f':
+			secbits_new |= SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE |
+				       SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE_LOCKED;
+			has_policy = true;
+			break;
+		case 'i':
+			secbits_new |= SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE |
+				       SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE_LOCKED;
+			has_policy = true;
+			break;
+		default:
+			print_usage(argv[0]);
+			return 1;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!argv[optind] || !has_policy) {
+		print_usage(argv[0]);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	if (secbits_cur != secbits_new &&
+	    prctl(PR_SET_SECUREBITS, secbits_new)) {
+		perror("Failed to set secure bit(s).");
+		fprintf(stderr,
+			"Hint: The running kernel may not support this feature.\n");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	cmd_path = argv[optind];
+	cmd_argv = argv + optind;
+	fprintf(stderr, "Executing command...\n");
+	execvpe(cmd_path, cmd_argv, envp);
+	fprintf(stderr, "Failed to execute \"%s\": %s\n", cmd_path,
+		strerror(errno));
+	return 1;
+}