selftests/bpf: Test packet range of pointers sharing an idgrafted

Add tests where two packet pointers share an id and tightening one
pointer's umax from its var_off would put it less than their constant
distance from the other's umax: with an index & 0x38 capped at 50, the
base pointer keeps umax 50, so the pointer 8 bytes further on must keep
umax 58, even though its known bits allow at most 56.

These refused a valid program or accepted an out-of-bounds access before
the fix:

- check the advanced copy, load through the base: valid, was refused;
- check the base, load the byte at base + 1 through a copy advanced by
  8: was accepted;
- check base + 4, load 4 bytes at base + 2 through base + 8: reads two
  bytes past the checked range, was accepted;
- the same as the second with data_meta pointers checked against data:
  was accepted.

These pass with and without the fix and cover nearby paths:

- subtract an unknown scalar from a checked pointer and load below it
  (the range is kept across a new id);
- reach a load through two paths whose checks cover 8 and 7 bytes after
  the loaded pointer; the second path must not be pruned by the first;
- spill a copy of a pointer, check the pointer, fill the copy and load
  one byte past the checked range: the load is refused, and the copy
  has the range of the check.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20261001145255.855630-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>

1 files changed, 85 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c b/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ba86a60a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/samples/check-exec/set-exec.c
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
+/*
+ * Simple tool to set SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE, SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE,
+ * before executing a command.
+ *
+ * Copyright © 2024 Microsoft Corporation
+ */
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#define __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <linux/prctl.h>
+#include <linux/securebits.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+static void print_usage(const char *argv0)
+{
+	fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s -f|-i -- <cmd> [args]...\n\n", argv0);
+	fprintf(stderr, "Execute a command with\n");
+	fprintf(stderr, "- SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE set: -f\n");
+	fprintf(stderr, "- SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE set: -i\n");
+}
+
+int main(const int argc, char *const argv[], char *const *const envp)
+{
+	const char *cmd_path;
+	char *const *cmd_argv;
+	int opt, secbits_cur, secbits_new;
+	bool has_policy = false;
+
+	secbits_cur = prctl(PR_GET_SECUREBITS);
+	if (secbits_cur == -1) {
+		/*
+		 * This should never happen, except with a buggy seccomp
+		 * filter.
+		 */
+		perror("ERROR: Failed to get securebits");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	secbits_new = secbits_cur;
+	while ((opt = getopt(argc, argv, "fi")) != -1) {
+		switch (opt) {
+		case 'f':
+			secbits_new |= SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE |
+				       SECBIT_EXEC_RESTRICT_FILE_LOCKED;
+			has_policy = true;
+			break;
+		case 'i':
+			secbits_new |= SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE |
+				       SECBIT_EXEC_DENY_INTERACTIVE_LOCKED;
+			has_policy = true;
+			break;
+		default:
+			print_usage(argv[0]);
+			return 1;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!argv[optind] || !has_policy) {
+		print_usage(argv[0]);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	if (secbits_cur != secbits_new &&
+	    prctl(PR_SET_SECUREBITS, secbits_new)) {
+		perror("Failed to set secure bit(s).");
+		fprintf(stderr,
+			"Hint: The running kernel may not support this feature.\n");
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	cmd_path = argv[optind];
+	cmd_argv = argv + optind;
+	fprintf(stderr, "Executing command...\n");
+	execvpe(cmd_path, cmd_argv, envp);
+	fprintf(stderr, "Failed to execute \"%s\": %s\n", cmd_path,
+		strerror(errno));
+	return 1;
+}