summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/rust/zerocopy-derive/derive/unaligned.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /rust/zerocopy-derive/derive/unaligned.rs
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/zerocopy-derive/derive/unaligned.rs')
-rw-r--r--rust/zerocopy-derive/derive/unaligned.rs80
1 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/rust/zerocopy-derive/derive/unaligned.rs b/rust/zerocopy-derive/derive/unaligned.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7c97d62e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rust/zerocopy-derive/derive/unaligned.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (BSD-2-Clause OR Apache-2.0) OR MIT
+//
+use proc_macro2::{Span, TokenStream};
+use syn::{Data, DataEnum, DataStruct, DataUnion, Error};
+
+use crate::{
+ repr::{EnumRepr, StructUnionRepr},
+ util::{Ctx, FieldBounds, ImplBlockBuilder, Trait},
+};
+
+pub(crate) fn derive_unaligned(ctx: &Ctx, _top_level: Trait) -> Result<TokenStream, Error> {
+ match &ctx.ast.data {
+ Data::Struct(strct) => derive_unaligned_struct(ctx, strct),
+ Data::Enum(enm) => derive_unaligned_enum(ctx, enm),
+ Data::Union(unn) => derive_unaligned_union(ctx, unn),
+ }
+}
+
+/// A struct is `Unaligned` if:
+/// - `repr(align)` is no more than 1 and either
+/// - `repr(C)` or `repr(transparent)` and
+/// - all fields `Unaligned`
+/// - `repr(packed)`
+fn derive_unaligned_struct(ctx: &Ctx, strct: &DataStruct) -> Result<TokenStream, Error> {
+ let repr = StructUnionRepr::from_attrs(&ctx.ast.attrs)?;
+ repr.unaligned_validate_no_align_gt_1()?;
+
+ let field_bounds = if repr.is_packed_1() {
+ FieldBounds::None
+ } else if repr.is_c() || repr.is_transparent() {
+ FieldBounds::ALL_SELF
+ } else {
+ return ctx.error_or_skip(Error::new(
+ Span::call_site(),
+ "must have #[repr(C)], #[repr(transparent)], or #[repr(packed)] attribute in order to guarantee this type's alignment",
+ ));
+ };
+
+ Ok(ImplBlockBuilder::new(ctx, strct, Trait::Unaligned, field_bounds).build())
+}
+
+/// An enum is `Unaligned` if:
+/// - No `repr(align(N > 1))`
+/// - `repr(u8)` or `repr(i8)`
+fn derive_unaligned_enum(ctx: &Ctx, enm: &DataEnum) -> Result<TokenStream, Error> {
+ let repr = EnumRepr::from_attrs(&ctx.ast.attrs)?;
+ repr.unaligned_validate_no_align_gt_1()?;
+
+ if !repr.is_u8() && !repr.is_i8() {
+ return ctx.error_or_skip(Error::new(
+ Span::call_site(),
+ "must have #[repr(u8)] or #[repr(i8)] attribute in order to guarantee this type's alignment",
+ ));
+ }
+
+ Ok(ImplBlockBuilder::new(ctx, enm, Trait::Unaligned, FieldBounds::ALL_SELF).build())
+}
+
+/// Like structs, a union is `Unaligned` if:
+/// - `repr(align)` is no more than 1 and either
+/// - `repr(C)` or `repr(transparent)` and
+/// - all fields `Unaligned`
+/// - `repr(packed)`
+fn derive_unaligned_union(ctx: &Ctx, unn: &DataUnion) -> Result<TokenStream, Error> {
+ let repr = StructUnionRepr::from_attrs(&ctx.ast.attrs)?;
+ repr.unaligned_validate_no_align_gt_1()?;
+
+ let field_type_trait_bounds = if repr.is_packed_1() {
+ FieldBounds::None
+ } else if repr.is_c() || repr.is_transparent() {
+ FieldBounds::ALL_SELF
+ } else {
+ return ctx.error_or_skip(Error::new(
+ Span::call_site(),
+ "must have #[repr(C)], #[repr(transparent)], or #[repr(packed)] attribute in order to guarantee this type's alignment",
+ ));
+ };
+
+ Ok(ImplBlockBuilder::new(ctx, unn, Trait::Unaligned, field_type_trait_bounds).build())
+}