Merge tag 'io_uring-7.3-20261002' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linuxgrafted

Pull io_uring fixes from Jens Axboe:

 - Fix a task_work add use-after-free with SQPOLL.

   The sqpoll thread could pop and complete the last request while
   io_req_normal_work_add() was still looking at them after the mpscq
   push.

   Use the same approach as DEFER_TASKRUN to protect from that, holding
   an RCU read lock across the add, and have exit wait for an RCU grace
   period for SQPOLL rings as well.

 - CQE32 ring fixes: correct the free entry check for 32b CQEs, zero the
   big_cqe for aux CQEs, and only post the dummy skip CQE on CQE_MIXED
   rings

 - Mark the source filter table as COW when cloning bpf filters, so
   registering another filter on the source doesn't modify the shared
   table in place

 - Initialize the task context before running the BPF loop

 - Requeue zcrx multishot receives stopped by a local resource

 - End a TX_TIMESTAMP multishot cmd when the CQ is full (lollipopkit)

* tag 'io_uring-7.3-20261002' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux:
  io_uring: fix task_work add use-after-free with SQPOLL
  io_uring/cmd_net: end TX_TIMESTAMP multishot when the CQ is full
  io_uring/zcrx: requeue multishot receives stopped by a local resource
  io_uring: initialize task context before running the BPF loop
  io_uring: zero big_cqe for aux CQEs on CQE32 rings
  io_uring: fix free entry check for 32b CQEs on CQE32 rings
  io_uring: only post the dummy skip CQE on CQE_MIXED rings
  io_uring/bpf_filter: mark source as COW when cloning filters

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/rust/helpers/build_assert.c b/rust/helpers/build_assert.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6a54b2680
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rust/helpers/build_assert.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/build_bug.h>
+
+/*
+ * `bindgen` binds the C `size_t` type as the Rust `usize` type, so we can
+ * use it in contexts where Rust expects a `usize` like slice (array) indices.
+ * `usize` is defined to be the same as C's `uintptr_t` type (can hold any
+ * pointer) but not necessarily the same as `size_t` (can hold the size of any
+ * single object). Most modern platforms use the same concrete integer type for
+ * both of them, but in case we find ourselves on a platform where
+ * that's not true, fail early instead of risking ABI or
+ * integer-overflow issues.
+ *
+ * If your platform fails this assertion, it means that you are in
+ * danger of integer-overflow bugs (even if you attempt to add
+ * `--no-size_t-is-usize`). It may be easiest to change the kernel ABI on
+ * your platform such that `size_t` matches `uintptr_t` (i.e., to increase
+ * `size_t`, because `uintptr_t` has to be at least as big as `size_t`).
+ */
+static_assert(
+	sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(uintptr_t) &&
+	__alignof__(size_t) == __alignof__(uintptr_t),
+	"Rust code expects C `size_t` to match Rust `usize`"
+);