summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/rust/helpers/build_assert.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn>2026-08-20 13:53:06 +0000
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2026-09-01 16:50:04 +0200
commit263f7d61a4201cde16849b2d016251806e7418be (patch)
tree861df7c5b878b85741cf319ece81111b4c41c3b1 /rust/helpers/build_assert.c
downloadlinux-stable-263f7d61a4201cde16849b2d016251806e7418be.tar.gz
linux-stable-263f7d61a4201cde16849b2d016251806e7418be.zip
usb: typec: qcom-pmic-typec: disable cc_debounce_dwork on stopgrafted
cc_debounce_dwork is queued from the set_cc() and start_toggling() callbacks, which run from TCPM's kthread worker. port_stop() returns before tcpm_unregister_port() destroys that worker. Flushing the worker during unregister may therefore run a callback which queues the delayed work after port_stop() has returned. The delayed work can then run after devres has freed pmic_typec_port. Use disable_delayed_work_sync() in port_stop() to cancel a pending instance and prevent the TCPM callbacks from queueing another one. This issue was found by an in-house static analysis tool. Fixes: a4422ff22142 ("usb: typec: qcom: Add Qualcomm PMIC Type-C driver") Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> # v6.10+ Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6 Signed-off-by: Fan Wu <fanwu01@zju.edu.cn> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260820135307.153773-2-fanwu01@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/helpers/build_assert.c')
-rw-r--r--rust/helpers/build_assert.c25
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/rust/helpers/build_assert.c b/rust/helpers/build_assert.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6a54b2680
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rust/helpers/build_assert.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/build_bug.h>
+
+/*
+ * `bindgen` binds the C `size_t` type as the Rust `usize` type, so we can
+ * use it in contexts where Rust expects a `usize` like slice (array) indices.
+ * `usize` is defined to be the same as C's `uintptr_t` type (can hold any
+ * pointer) but not necessarily the same as `size_t` (can hold the size of any
+ * single object). Most modern platforms use the same concrete integer type for
+ * both of them, but in case we find ourselves on a platform where
+ * that's not true, fail early instead of risking ABI or
+ * integer-overflow issues.
+ *
+ * If your platform fails this assertion, it means that you are in
+ * danger of integer-overflow bugs (even if you attempt to add
+ * `--no-size_t-is-usize`). It may be easiest to change the kernel ABI on
+ * your platform such that `size_t` matches `uintptr_t` (i.e., to increase
+ * `size_t`, because `uintptr_t` has to be at least as big as `size_t`).
+ */
+static_assert(
+ sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(uintptr_t) &&
+ __alignof__(size_t) == __alignof__(uintptr_t),
+ "Rust code expects C `size_t` to match Rust `usize`"
+);