PCI: Add pci_irq_type() to query the allocated interrupt typegrafted

Add a helper that returns PCI_IRQ_MSIX, PCI_IRQ_MSI, or PCI_IRQ_INTX
based on the interrupt type the PCI core selected after
pci_alloc_irq_vectors().

Several drivers already open-code this check against pdev->msix_enabled
and pdev->msi_enabled, or even open code this helper [1].

A common helper avoids the duplication and keeps drivers from accessing
the bitfield directly (see also [2]).

Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Tested-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1/source/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_pci_func.c#L196 [1]
Inspired-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DKKG2QM3YJYB.Z2H2B2UXJ75N@kernel.org/ [2]
Reviewed-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260813165234.620555-5-dakr@kernel.org
[ Add missing pci_irq_type() stub for CONFIG_PCI=n. ]
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/wireless/tests/util.c b/net/wireless/tests/util.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..118f7fb42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/wireless/tests/util.c
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * KUnit fixture to have a (configurable) wiphy
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation
+ */
+#include <linux/ieee80211.h>
+#include <net/cfg80211.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
+#include "util.h"
+
+int t_wiphy_init(struct kunit_resource *resource, void *ctx)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
+	struct cfg80211_ops *ops;
+	struct wiphy *wiphy;
+	struct t_wiphy_priv *priv;
+
+	ops = kzalloc_obj(*ops);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ops);
+
+	wiphy = wiphy_new_nm(ops, sizeof(*priv), "kunit");
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, wiphy);
+
+	priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
+	priv->ctx = ctx;
+	priv->ops = ops;
+
+	/* Initialize channels, feel free to add more here channels/bands */
+	memcpy(priv->channels_2ghz, channels_2ghz, sizeof(channels_2ghz));
+	wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ] = &priv->band_2ghz;
+	priv->band_2ghz.channels = priv->channels_2ghz;
+	priv->band_2ghz.n_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(channels_2ghz);
+
+	resource->data = wiphy;
+	resource->name = "wiphy";
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void t_wiphy_exit(struct kunit_resource *resource)
+{
+	struct t_wiphy_priv *priv;
+	struct cfg80211_ops *ops;
+
+	priv = wiphy_priv(resource->data);
+	ops = priv->ops;
+
+	/* Should we ensure anything about the state here?
+	 * e.g. full destruction or no calls to any ops on destruction?
+	 */
+
+	wiphy_free(resource->data);
+	kfree(ops);
+}