objtool: Validate disassembler headers in libopcodes probegrafted

commit 3f2de814c059 ("objtool: Fix libopcodes linking with static libraries")
tested for libopcodes availability by linking a test snippet with a forward
declaration of disassemble_init_for_target().

However, testing symbol linkage with an extern declaration only verifies
the presence of the library (.so/.a) and bypasses checking for development
headers (binutils-dev). On systems where libopcodes is present without
development headers installed, the probe succeeds, enabling BUILD_DISAS.
Subsequent compilation of objtool then fails:

  fatal error: 'bfd.h' file not found
    113 | #include <bfd.h>

Additionally, the probe invokes $(HOSTCC) without $(HOSTCFLAGS), ignoring
any sysroot or include flags specified for the host compiler.

Fix this by including <bfd.h> and <dis-asm.h> directly in the test snippet,
passing $(HOSTCFLAGS) so host compiler options are respected, and defining
PACKAGE="objtool" to satisfy the configuration check in <bfd.h>.

Fixes: 3f2de814c059 ("objtool: Fix libopcodes linking with static libraries")
Fixes: 436326bc525d ("objtool: fix build failure due to missing libopcodes check")
Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Assisted-by: Antigravity:Gemini-Next
Signed-off-by: Ulises Mendez Martinez <umendez@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260904150710.2997558-1-umendez@google.com
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/wireless/tests/util.c b/net/wireless/tests/util.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..118f7fb42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/wireless/tests/util.c
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * KUnit fixture to have a (configurable) wiphy
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation
+ */
+#include <linux/ieee80211.h>
+#include <net/cfg80211.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
+#include "util.h"
+
+int t_wiphy_init(struct kunit_resource *resource, void *ctx)
+{
+	struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
+	struct cfg80211_ops *ops;
+	struct wiphy *wiphy;
+	struct t_wiphy_priv *priv;
+
+	ops = kzalloc_obj(*ops);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, ops);
+
+	wiphy = wiphy_new_nm(ops, sizeof(*priv), "kunit");
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, wiphy);
+
+	priv = wiphy_priv(wiphy);
+	priv->ctx = ctx;
+	priv->ops = ops;
+
+	/* Initialize channels, feel free to add more here channels/bands */
+	memcpy(priv->channels_2ghz, channels_2ghz, sizeof(channels_2ghz));
+	wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ] = &priv->band_2ghz;
+	priv->band_2ghz.channels = priv->channels_2ghz;
+	priv->band_2ghz.n_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(channels_2ghz);
+
+	resource->data = wiphy;
+	resource->name = "wiphy";
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void t_wiphy_exit(struct kunit_resource *resource)
+{
+	struct t_wiphy_priv *priv;
+	struct cfg80211_ops *ops;
+
+	priv = wiphy_priv(resource->data);
+	ops = priv->ops;
+
+	/* Should we ensure anything about the state here?
+	 * e.g. full destruction or no calls to any ops on destruction?
+	 */
+
+	wiphy_free(resource->data);
+	kfree(ops);
+}