scftorture: Count single_rpc offline failures in statistics outputgrafted

scf_torture_stats_print() aggregates each invoker thread's counters
into a local scf_statistics structure before printing, but the
n_single_rpc_ofl field is missing from the aggregation loop.  As a
result, the "single_rpc_ofl" value printed in the statistics line is
always zero, even when smp_call_function_single() invocations for the
RPC test have failed due to offline CPUs and been counted by the
invoker threads.

Add the missing accumulation so that the printed value reflects the
actual counts.

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/wireless/ap.c b/net/wireless/ap.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9a9a87080
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/wireless/ap.c
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Parts of this file are
+ * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Intel Corporation
+ */
+#include <linux/ieee80211.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <net/cfg80211.h>
+#include "nl80211.h"
+#include "core.h"
+#include "rdev-ops.h"
+
+
+static int ___cfg80211_stop_ap(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
+			       struct net_device *dev, unsigned int link_id,
+			       bool notify)
+{
+	struct wireless_dev *wdev = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
+	int err;
+
+	lockdep_assert_wiphy(wdev->wiphy);
+
+	if (!rdev->ops->stop_ap)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (dev->ieee80211_ptr->iftype != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP &&
+	    dev->ieee80211_ptr->iftype != NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_GO)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (!wdev->links[link_id].ap.beacon_interval)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	err = rdev_stop_ap(rdev, dev, link_id);
+	if (!err) {
+		wdev->conn_owner_nlportid = 0;
+		wdev->links[link_id].ap.beacon_interval = 0;
+		memset(&wdev->links[link_id].ap.chandef, 0,
+		       sizeof(wdev->links[link_id].ap.chandef));
+		wdev->u.ap.ssid_len = 0;
+		rdev_set_qos_map(rdev, dev, NULL);
+		if (notify)
+			nl80211_send_ap_stopped(wdev, link_id);
+
+		/* Should we apply the grace period during beaconing interface
+		 * shutdown also?
+		 */
+		cfg80211_sched_dfs_chan_update(rdev);
+	}
+
+	schedule_work(&cfg80211_disconnect_work);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+int cfg80211_stop_ap(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
+		     struct net_device *dev, int link_id,
+		     bool notify)
+{
+	unsigned int link;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (link_id >= 0)
+		return ___cfg80211_stop_ap(rdev, dev, link_id, notify);
+
+	for_each_valid_link(dev->ieee80211_ptr, link) {
+		int ret1 = ___cfg80211_stop_ap(rdev, dev, link, notify);
+
+		if (ret1)
+			ret = ret1;
+		/* try the next one also if one errored */
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}