summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>2026-09-03 10:43:25 -0500
committerBorislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>2026-09-10 18:05:43 -0700
commit27600805e62f800bacf990354632eae4e487d34c (patch)
treee8aec0ddfaa0bc264d79af632e3de3f1b75ae4c8 /net/rxrpc/insecure.c
downloadlinux-stable-27600805e62f800bacf990354632eae4e487d34c.tar.gz
linux-stable-27600805e62f800bacf990354632eae4e487d34c.zip
x86/amd_node: Fix PCI device reference counting in amd_smn_init()grafted
The local "root" pointer is a temporary variable used during the device search. Therefore, refcount related to the search iterators should be cleaned up after the search is complete. Use the __free() cleanup macro to ensure the refcount is decremented when the temporary pointer goes out of scope. Additionally, increment the refcount when caching a root pointer. This ensures the in-use refcount is separate from the temporary search refcounting. Finally, drop the redundant "root = NULL" before the second search loop. The pci_get_class() iterator always decrements the refcount of its "from" argument, so the first loop can only fall through with "root" already NULL. Fixes: 0a4b61d9c2e4 ("x86/amd_node: Fix AMD root device caching") Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806160159.230453-1-jason.andryuk%40amd.com Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> Assisted-by: LLM Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260903154325.74343-1-yazen.ghannam@amd.com
Diffstat (limited to 'net/rxrpc/insecure.c')
-rw-r--r--net/rxrpc/insecure.c94
1 files changed, 94 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0b39046bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/* Null security operations.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2016 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
+ * Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com)
+ */
+
+#include <net/af_rxrpc.h>
+#include "ar-internal.h"
+
+static int none_init_connection_security(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
+ struct rxrpc_key_token *token)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Allocate an appropriately sized buffer for the amount of data remaining.
+ */
+static struct rxrpc_txbuf *none_alloc_txbuf(struct rxrpc_call *call, size_t remain, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+ return rxrpc_alloc_data_txbuf(call, umin(remain, RXRPC_JUMBO_DATALEN), 1, gfp);
+}
+
+static int none_secure_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct rxrpc_txbuf *txb)
+{
+ txb->pkt_len = txb->len;
+ if (txb->len == RXRPC_JUMBO_DATALEN)
+ txb->jumboable = true;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int none_verify_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void none_free_call_crypto(struct rxrpc_call *call)
+{
+}
+
+static bool none_validate_challenge(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
+ struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ rxrpc_abort_conn(conn, skb, RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR, -EPROTO,
+ rxrpc_eproto_rxnull_challenge);
+ return true;
+}
+
+static int none_sendmsg_respond_to_challenge(struct sk_buff *challenge,
+ struct msghdr *msg)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+static int none_verify_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
+ struct sk_buff *response_skb,
+ void *response, unsigned int len)
+{
+ return rxrpc_abort_conn(conn, response_skb, RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR, -EPROTO,
+ rxrpc_eproto_rxnull_response);
+}
+
+static void none_clear(struct rxrpc_connection *conn)
+{
+}
+
+static int none_init(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void none_exit(void)
+{
+}
+
+/*
+ * RxRPC Kerberos-based security
+ */
+const struct rxrpc_security rxrpc_no_security = {
+ .name = "none",
+ .security_index = RXRPC_SECURITY_NONE,
+ .init = none_init,
+ .exit = none_exit,
+ .init_connection_security = none_init_connection_security,
+ .free_call_crypto = none_free_call_crypto,
+ .alloc_txbuf = none_alloc_txbuf,
+ .secure_packet = none_secure_packet,
+ .verify_packet = none_verify_packet,
+ .validate_challenge = none_validate_challenge,
+ .sendmsg_respond_to_challenge = none_sendmsg_respond_to_challenge,
+ .verify_response = none_verify_response,
+ .clear = none_clear,
+};