ftrace: Synchronize the initialization of ftrace_opsgrafted

There's some internal state that ftrace_ops needs to have set, but since
it can be declared outside of the ftrace.c code, it calls
ftrace_ops_init() on the ops in every global function. The issue is that
if two tasks call it on the same ops at the same time it is possible to
have the initialization of one corrupt the initialization of the other
call.

Create a ops_mutex to use to synchronize every initialization of the
ftrace_ops. The mutex is taken within checking the ftrace_ops flag that
states it was initializied but the flag is checked again after the mutex
has been taken. Checking first outside the mutex allows it to shortcut
having to take the mutex. But then the check needs to be done again after
the mute is taken in case of races.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260902095501.6b59af20@gandalf.local.home
Fixes: f04f24fb7e48d ("ftrace, kprobes: Fix a deadlock on ftrace_regex_lock")
Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829025528.49A831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

1 files changed, 94 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/ceph/msgpool.c b/net/ceph/msgpool.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e3ecb80cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/ceph/msgpool.c
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/ceph/ceph_debug.h>
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+
+#include <linux/ceph/messenger.h>
+#include <linux/ceph/msgpool.h>
+
+static void *msgpool_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, void *arg)
+{
+	struct ceph_msgpool *pool = arg;
+	struct ceph_msg *msg;
+
+	msg = ceph_msg_new2(pool->type, pool->front_len, pool->max_data_items,
+			    gfp_mask, true);
+	if (!msg) {
+		dout("msgpool_alloc %s failed\n", pool->name);
+	} else {
+		dout("msgpool_alloc %s %p\n", pool->name, msg);
+		msg->pool = pool;
+	}
+	return msg;
+}
+
+static void msgpool_free(void *element, void *arg)
+{
+	struct ceph_msgpool *pool = arg;
+	struct ceph_msg *msg = element;
+
+	dout("msgpool_release %s %p\n", pool->name, msg);
+	msg->pool = NULL;
+	ceph_msg_put(msg);
+}
+
+int ceph_msgpool_init(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, int type,
+		      int front_len, int max_data_items, int size,
+		      const char *name)
+{
+	dout("msgpool %s init\n", name);
+	pool->type = type;
+	pool->front_len = front_len;
+	pool->max_data_items = max_data_items;
+	pool->pool = mempool_create(size, msgpool_alloc, msgpool_free, pool);
+	if (!pool->pool)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	pool->name = name;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void ceph_msgpool_destroy(struct ceph_msgpool *pool)
+{
+	dout("msgpool %s destroy\n", pool->name);
+	mempool_destroy(pool->pool);
+}
+
+struct ceph_msg *ceph_msgpool_get(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, int front_len,
+				  int max_data_items)
+{
+	struct ceph_msg *msg;
+
+	if (front_len > pool->front_len ||
+	    max_data_items > pool->max_data_items) {
+		pr_warn_ratelimited("%s need %d/%d, pool %s has %d/%d\n",
+		    __func__, front_len, max_data_items, pool->name,
+		    pool->front_len, pool->max_data_items);
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+
+		/* try to alloc a fresh message */
+		return ceph_msg_new2(pool->type, front_len, max_data_items,
+				     GFP_NOFS, false);
+	}
+
+	msg = mempool_alloc(pool->pool, GFP_NOFS);
+	dout("msgpool_get %s %p\n", pool->name, msg);
+	return msg;
+}
+
+void ceph_msgpool_put(struct ceph_msgpool *pool, struct ceph_msg *msg)
+{
+	dout("msgpool_put %s %p\n", pool->name, msg);
+
+	/* reset msg front_len; user may have changed it */
+	msg->front.iov_len = pool->front_len;
+	msg->hdr.front_len = cpu_to_le32(pool->front_len);
+
+	msg->data_length = 0;
+	msg->num_data_items = 0;
+
+	kref_init(&msg->kref);  /* retake single ref */
+	mempool_free(msg, pool->pool);
+}