x86/kprobes: Fix crash when probing CS CALL instructionsgrafted

When using eBPF to probe CS CALL instructions within a function,
a crash can be triggered.

The eBPF tool probes offset 257 of the __hrtimer_run_queues()
function:

<__hrtimer_run_queues+249>:  nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
<__hrtimer_run_queues+254>:  mov    %r14,%rdi
<__hrtimer_run_queues+257>:  cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12>
<__hrtimer_run_queues+263>:  mov    %eax,%r12d
<__hrtimer_run_queues+266>:  xchg   %ax,%ax
<__hrtimer_run_queues+268>:  mov    %r13,%rdi

Which triggers this crash:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9
  #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
  #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
  PGD 0 P4D 0
  Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P
  RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230

Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is
at the 6th byte of the above CS CALL instruction. Since the CS CALL
instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that
call instruction.

The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a
function, a kprobe with INT3 is used as the underlying implementation.

During single-step emulation of the original CALL instruction,
int3_emulate_call() assumes that the probed CALL instruction is 5 bytes
long. However, the actual CS-prefixed CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes,
so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU
returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at
the address of the last byte of that CS CALL instruction. Coincidentally,
starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely
different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash.

Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from
the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return
address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro.

[ mingo: Refined the changelog ]

Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step")
Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260908073742.GA10517@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000

1 files changed, 100 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/win_minmax.c b/lib/win_minmax.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1682e6143
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/win_minmax.c
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * lib/minmax.c: windowed min/max tracker
+ *
+ * Kathleen Nichols' algorithm for tracking the minimum (or maximum)
+ * value of a data stream over some fixed time interval.  (E.g.,
+ * the minimum RTT over the past five minutes.) It uses constant
+ * space and constant time per update yet almost always delivers
+ * the same minimum as an implementation that has to keep all the
+ * data in the window.
+ *
+ * The algorithm keeps track of the best, 2nd best & 3rd best min
+ * values, maintaining an invariant that the measurement time of
+ * the n'th best >= n-1'th best. It also makes sure that the three
+ * values are widely separated in the time window since that bounds
+ * the worse case error when that data is monotonically increasing
+ * over the window.
+ *
+ * Upon getting a new min, we can forget everything earlier because
+ * it has no value - the new min is <= everything else in the window
+ * by definition and it's the most recent. So we restart fresh on
+ * every new min and overwrites 2nd & 3rd choices. The same property
+ * holds for 2nd & 3rd best.
+ */
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/win_minmax.h>
+
+/* As time advances, update the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choices. */
+static u32 minmax_subwin_update(struct minmax *m, u32 win,
+				const struct minmax_sample *val)
+{
+	u32 dt = val->t - m->s[0].t;
+
+	if (unlikely(dt > win)) {
+		/*
+		 * Passed entire window without a new val so make 2nd
+		 * choice the new val & 3rd choice the new 2nd choice.
+		 * we may have to iterate this since our 2nd choice
+		 * may also be outside the window (we checked on entry
+		 * that the third choice was in the window).
+		 */
+		m->s[0] = m->s[1];
+		m->s[1] = m->s[2];
+		m->s[2] = *val;
+		if (unlikely(val->t - m->s[0].t > win)) {
+			m->s[0] = m->s[1];
+			m->s[1] = m->s[2];
+			m->s[2] = *val;
+		}
+	} else if (unlikely(m->s[1].t == m->s[0].t) && dt > win/4) {
+		/*
+		 * We've passed a quarter of the window without a new val
+		 * so take a 2nd choice from the 2nd quarter of the window.
+		 */
+		m->s[2] = m->s[1] = *val;
+	} else if (unlikely(m->s[2].t == m->s[1].t) && dt > win/2) {
+		/*
+		 * We've passed half the window without finding a new val
+		 * so take a 3rd choice from the last half of the window
+		 */
+		m->s[2] = *val;
+	}
+	return m->s[0].v;
+}
+
+/* Check if new measurement updates the 1st, 2nd or 3rd choice max. */
+u32 minmax_running_max(struct minmax *m, u32 win, u32 t, u32 meas)
+{
+	struct minmax_sample val = { .t = t, .v = meas };
+
+	if (unlikely(val.v >= m->s[0].v) ||	  /* found new max? */
+	    unlikely(val.t - m->s[2].t > win))	  /* nothing left in window? */
+		return minmax_reset(m, t, meas);  /* forget earlier samples */
+
+	if (unlikely(val.v >= m->s[1].v))
+		m->s[2] = m->s[1] = val;
+	else if (unlikely(val.v >= m->s[2].v))
+		m->s[2] = val;
+
+	return minmax_subwin_update(m, win, &val);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(minmax_running_max);
+
+/* Check if new measurement updates the 1st, 2nd or 3rd choice min. */
+u32 minmax_running_min(struct minmax *m, u32 win, u32 t, u32 meas)
+{
+	struct minmax_sample val = { .t = t, .v = meas };
+
+	if (unlikely(val.v <= m->s[0].v) ||	  /* found new min? */
+	    unlikely(val.t - m->s[2].t > win))	  /* nothing left in window? */
+		return minmax_reset(m, t, meas);  /* forget earlier samples */
+
+	if (unlikely(val.v <= m->s[1].v))
+		m->s[2] = m->s[1] = val;
+	else if (unlikely(val.v <= m->s[2].v))
+		m->s[2] = val;
+
+	return minmax_subwin_update(m, win, &val);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(minmax_running_min);