diff options
| author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2026-09-14 22:12:34 -1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2026-09-15 06:57:20 -1000 |
| commit | a9e3760b0838299649c0d57cca44daaf40ba3c33 (patch) | |
| tree | 95807ff0e511c05602ef34808cfc660303309057 /lib/tests/usercopy_kunit.c | |
| download | linux-stable-a9e3760b0838299649c0d57cca44daaf40ba3c33.tar.gz linux-stable-a9e3760b0838299649c0d57cca44daaf40ba3c33.zip | |
sched_ext: Maintain an online cid mask in the scheduler arenagrafted
Schedulers on the default cid mapping treat [0, nr_online_cids) as the
online set and restart on hotplug. Schedulers that install their own mapping
with scx_bpf_cid_override() have no way to learn which cids are online: the
count no longer identifies members and the CPU-form cpumask is unusable from
cid programs. This is an obvious hole in the cid API.
Add scx_bpf_online_cmask(), a kernel-maintained cmask in the scheduler's
arena, allocated alongside the per-CPU scratch masks and populated after the
cid mapping is finalized and before ops.init(), for child schedulers too.
The pointer stays valid through ops.exit() with no reference to take. It is
the arena offset as a void pointer, the same form struct_ops arena arguments
arrive in. The verifier types the void return as a scalar for the program's
arena cast.
The mask follows the SCX hotplug notifications: seeded from cpu_active_mask
and updated before ops.cid_online/offline() runs, so it lags cpu_online_mask
only inside a hotplug transition. Updates walk the scheduler list under the
lock that also serializes unlinking. Reads are live, not atomic snapshots.
Root initialization excludes hotplug.
v2: Reworded the getter kerneldoc (Andrea Righi).
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/tests/usercopy_kunit.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/tests/usercopy_kunit.c | 336 |
1 files changed, 336 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/tests/usercopy_kunit.c b/lib/tests/usercopy_kunit.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..80f8abe10 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/tests/usercopy_kunit.c @@ -0,0 +1,336 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Kernel module for testing copy_to/from_user infrastructure. + * + * Copyright 2013 Google Inc. All Rights Reserved + * + * Authors: + * Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> + */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + +#include <linux/mman.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/uaccess.h> +#include <kunit/test.h> + +/* + * Several 32-bit architectures support 64-bit {get,put}_user() calls. + * As there doesn't appear to be anything that can safely determine + * their capability at compile-time, we just have to opt-out certain archs. + */ +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 || (!(defined(CONFIG_ARM) && !defined(MMU)) && \ + !defined(CONFIG_M68K) && \ + !defined(CONFIG_MICROBLAZE) && \ + !defined(CONFIG_NIOS2) && \ + !defined(CONFIG_PPC32) && \ + !defined(CONFIG_SPARC32) && \ + !defined(CONFIG_SUPERH)) +# define TEST_U64 +#endif + +struct usercopy_test_priv { + char *kmem; + char __user *umem; + size_t size; +}; + +static bool is_zeroed(void *from, size_t size) +{ + return memchr_inv(from, 0x0, size) == NULL; +} + +/* Test usage of check_nonzero_user(). */ +static void usercopy_test_check_nonzero_user(struct kunit *test) +{ + size_t start, end, i, zero_start, zero_end; + struct usercopy_test_priv *priv = test->priv; + char __user *umem = priv->umem; + char *kmem = priv->kmem; + size_t size = priv->size; + + KUNIT_ASSERT_GE_MSG(test, size, 2 * PAGE_SIZE, "buffer too small"); + + /* + * We want to cross a page boundary to exercise the code more + * effectively. We also don't want to make the size we scan too large, + * otherwise the test can take a long time and cause soft lockups. So + * scan a 1024 byte region across the page boundary. + */ + size = 1024; + start = PAGE_SIZE - (size / 2); + + kmem += start; + umem += start; + + zero_start = size / 4; + zero_end = size - zero_start; + + /* + * We conduct a series of check_nonzero_user() tests on a block of + * memory with the following byte-pattern (trying every possible + * [start,end] pair): + * + * [ 00 ff 00 ff ... 00 00 00 00 ... ff 00 ff 00 ] + * + * And we verify that check_nonzero_user() acts identically to + * memchr_inv(). + */ + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + for (i = 1; i < zero_start; i += 2) + kmem[i] = 0xff; + for (i = zero_end; i < size; i += 2) + kmem[i] = 0xff; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_to_user(umem, kmem, size), 0, + "legitimate copy_to_user failed"); + + for (start = 0; start <= size; start++) { + for (end = start; end <= size; end++) { + size_t len = end - start; + int retval = check_zeroed_user(umem + start, len); + int expected = is_zeroed(kmem + start, len); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, retval, expected, + "check_nonzero_user(=%d) != memchr_inv(=%d) mismatch (start=%zu, end=%zu)", + retval, expected, start, end); + } + } +} + +/* Test usage of copy_struct_from_user(). */ +static void usercopy_test_copy_struct_from_user(struct kunit *test) +{ + char *umem_src = NULL, *expected = NULL; + struct usercopy_test_priv *priv = test->priv; + char __user *umem = priv->umem; + char *kmem = priv->kmem; + size_t size = priv->size; + size_t ksize, usize; + + umem_src = kunit_kmalloc(test, size, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, umem_src); + + expected = kunit_kmalloc(test, size, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, expected); + + /* Fill umem with a fixed byte pattern. */ + memset(umem_src, 0x3e, size); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_to_user(umem, umem_src, size), 0, + "legitimate copy_to_user failed"); + + /* Check basic case -- (usize == ksize). */ + ksize = size; + usize = size; + + memcpy(expected, umem_src, ksize); + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), 0, + "copy_struct_from_user(usize == ksize) failed"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, kmem, expected, ksize, + "copy_struct_from_user(usize == ksize) gives unexpected copy"); + + /* Old userspace case -- (usize < ksize). */ + ksize = size; + usize = size / 2; + + memcpy(expected, umem_src, usize); + memset(expected + usize, 0x0, ksize - usize); + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), 0, + "copy_struct_from_user(usize < ksize) failed"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, kmem, expected, ksize, + "copy_struct_from_user(usize < ksize) gives unexpected copy"); + + /* New userspace (-E2BIG) case -- (usize > ksize). */ + ksize = size / 2; + usize = size; + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), -E2BIG, + "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) didn't give E2BIG"); + + /* New userspace (success) case -- (usize > ksize). */ + ksize = size / 2; + usize = size; + + memcpy(expected, umem_src, ksize); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, clear_user(umem + ksize, usize - ksize), 0, + "legitimate clear_user failed"); + + memset(kmem, 0x0, size); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, copy_struct_from_user(kmem, ksize, umem, usize), 0, + "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) failed"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, kmem, expected, ksize, + "copy_struct_from_user(usize > ksize) gives unexpected copy"); +} + +/* + * Legitimate usage: none of these copies should fail. + */ +static void usercopy_test_valid(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct usercopy_test_priv *priv = test->priv; + char __user *usermem = priv->umem; + char *kmem = priv->kmem; + + memset(kmem, 0x3a, PAGE_SIZE * 2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0, copy_to_user(usermem, kmem, PAGE_SIZE), + "legitimate copy_to_user failed"); + memset(kmem, 0x0, PAGE_SIZE); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0, copy_from_user(kmem, usermem, PAGE_SIZE), + "legitimate copy_from_user failed"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, kmem, kmem + PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, + "legitimate usercopy failed to copy data"); + +#define test_legit(size, check) \ + do { \ + size val_##size = (check); \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0, \ + put_user(val_##size, (size __user *)usermem), \ + "legitimate put_user (" #size ") failed"); \ + val_##size = 0; \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, 0, \ + get_user(val_##size, (size __user *)usermem), \ + "legitimate get_user (" #size ") failed"); \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, val_##size, check, \ + "legitimate get_user (" #size ") failed to do copy"); \ + } while (0) + + test_legit(u8, 0x5a); + test_legit(u16, 0x5a5b); + test_legit(u32, 0x5a5b5c5d); +#ifdef TEST_U64 + test_legit(u64, 0x5a5b5c5d6a6b6c6d); +#endif +#undef test_legit +} + +/* + * Invalid usage: none of these copies should succeed. + */ +static void usercopy_test_invalid(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct usercopy_test_priv *priv = test->priv; + char __user *usermem = priv->umem; + char *bad_usermem = (char *)usermem; + char *kmem = priv->kmem; + u64 *kmem_u64 = (u64 *)kmem; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ALTERNATE_USER_ADDRESS_SPACE) || + !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU)) { + kunit_skip(test, "Testing for kernel/userspace address confusion is only sensible on architectures with a shared address space"); + return; + } + + /* Prepare kernel memory with check values. */ + memset(kmem, 0x5a, PAGE_SIZE); + memset(kmem + PAGE_SIZE, 0, PAGE_SIZE); + + /* Reject kernel-to-kernel copies through copy_from_user(). */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, copy_from_user(kmem, (char __user *)(kmem + PAGE_SIZE), + PAGE_SIZE), 0, + "illegal all-kernel copy_from_user passed"); + + /* Destination half of buffer should have been zeroed. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, kmem + PAGE_SIZE, kmem, PAGE_SIZE, + "zeroing failure for illegal all-kernel copy_from_user"); + +#if 0 + /* + * When running with SMAP/PAN/etc, this will Oops the kernel + * due to the zeroing of userspace memory on failure. This needs + * to be tested in LKDTM instead, since this test module does not + * expect to explode. + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, copy_from_user(bad_usermem, (char __user *)kmem, + PAGE_SIZE), 0, + "illegal reversed copy_from_user passed"); +#endif + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, copy_to_user((char __user *)kmem, kmem + PAGE_SIZE, + PAGE_SIZE), 0, + "illegal all-kernel copy_to_user passed"); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, copy_to_user((char __user *)kmem, bad_usermem, + PAGE_SIZE), 0, + "illegal reversed copy_to_user passed"); + +#define test_illegal(size, check) \ + do { \ + size val_##size = (check); \ + /* get_user() */ \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, get_user(val_##size, (size __user *)kmem), 0, \ + "illegal get_user (" #size ") passed"); \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, val_##size, 0, \ + "zeroing failure for illegal get_user (" #size ")"); \ + /* put_user() */ \ + *kmem_u64 = 0xF09FA4AFF09FA4AF; \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, put_user(val_##size, (size __user *)kmem), 0, \ + "illegal put_user (" #size ") passed"); \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, *kmem_u64, 0xF09FA4AFF09FA4AF, \ + "illegal put_user (" #size ") wrote to kernel memory!"); \ + } while (0) + + test_illegal(u8, 0x5a); + test_illegal(u16, 0x5a5b); + test_illegal(u32, 0x5a5b5c5d); +#ifdef TEST_U64 + test_illegal(u64, 0x5a5b5c5d6a6b6c6d); +#endif +#undef test_illegal +} + +static int usercopy_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct usercopy_test_priv *priv; + unsigned long user_addr; + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU)) { + kunit_skip(test, "Userspace allocation testing not available on non-MMU systems"); + return 0; + } + + priv = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv); + test->priv = priv; + priv->size = PAGE_SIZE * 2; + + priv->kmem = kunit_kmalloc(test, priv->size, GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv->kmem); + + user_addr = kunit_vm_mmap(test, NULL, 0, priv->size, + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC, + MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, user_addr, 0, + "Could not create userspace mm"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, user_addr, (unsigned long)TASK_SIZE, + "Failed to allocate user memory"); + priv->umem = (char __user *)user_addr; + + return 0; +} + +static struct kunit_case usercopy_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(usercopy_test_valid), + KUNIT_CASE(usercopy_test_invalid), + KUNIT_CASE(usercopy_test_check_nonzero_user), + KUNIT_CASE(usercopy_test_copy_struct_from_user), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite usercopy_test_suite = { + .name = "usercopy", + .init = usercopy_test_init, + .test_cases = usercopy_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suites(&usercopy_test_suite); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Kernel module for testing copy_to/from_user infrastructure"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); |
