x86/kprobes: Fix crash when probing CS CALL instructionsgrafted

When using eBPF to probe CS CALL instructions within a function,
a crash can be triggered.

The eBPF tool probes offset 257 of the __hrtimer_run_queues()
function:

<__hrtimer_run_queues+249>:  nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
<__hrtimer_run_queues+254>:  mov    %r14,%rdi
<__hrtimer_run_queues+257>:  cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12>
<__hrtimer_run_queues+263>:  mov    %eax,%r12d
<__hrtimer_run_queues+266>:  xchg   %ax,%ax
<__hrtimer_run_queues+268>:  mov    %r13,%rdi

Which triggers this crash:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9
  #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
  #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
  PGD 0 P4D 0
  Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P
  RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230

Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is
at the 6th byte of the above CS CALL instruction. Since the CS CALL
instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that
call instruction.

The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a
function, a kprobe with INT3 is used as the underlying implementation.

During single-step emulation of the original CALL instruction,
int3_emulate_call() assumes that the probed CALL instruction is 5 bytes
long. However, the actual CS-prefixed CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes,
so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU
returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at
the address of the last byte of that CS CALL instruction. Coincidentally,
starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely
different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash.

Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from
the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return
address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro.

[ mingo: Refined the changelog ]

Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step")
Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260908073742.GA10517@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000

1 files changed, 205 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/tests/bitops_kunit.c b/lib/tests/bitops_kunit.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7fd9d697f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/tests/bitops_kunit.c
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
+ * Copyright (C) 2026 Ryota Sakamoto <sakamo.ryota@gmail.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+/* use an enum because that's the most common BITMAP usage */
+enum bitops_fun {
+	BITOPS_4 = 4,
+	BITOPS_7 = 7,
+	BITOPS_11 = 11,
+	BITOPS_31 = 31,
+	BITOPS_88 = 88,
+	BITOPS_LENGTH = 256
+};
+
+struct bitops_test_case {
+	const char *str;
+	const long nr;
+};
+
+static struct bitops_test_case bitops_cases[] = {
+	{
+		.str = "BITOPS_4",
+		.nr = BITOPS_4,
+	},
+	{
+		.str = "BITOPS_7",
+		.nr = BITOPS_7,
+	},
+	{
+		.str = "BITOPS_11",
+		.nr = BITOPS_11,
+	},
+	{
+		.str = "BITOPS_31",
+		.nr = BITOPS_31,
+	},
+	{
+		.str = "BITOPS_88",
+		.nr = BITOPS_88,
+	},
+};
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(bitops, bitops_cases, str);
+
+static void test_set_bit_clear_bit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct bitops_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+	int bit_set;
+
+	bitmap_zero(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+
+	set_bit(params->nr, bitmap);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	clear_bit(params->nr, bitmap);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	bit_set = find_first_bit(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, bit_set, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+}
+
+static void test_change_bit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct bitops_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+	int bit_set;
+
+	bitmap_zero(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+
+	change_bit(params->nr, bitmap);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	change_bit(params->nr, bitmap);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	bit_set = find_first_bit(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, bit_set, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+}
+
+static void test_test_and_set_bit_test_and_clear_bit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct bitops_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+	int bit_set;
+
+	bitmap_zero(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, test_and_set_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, test_and_set_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, test_and_clear_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, test_and_clear_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	bit_set = find_first_bit(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, bit_set, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+}
+
+static void test_test_and_change_bit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct bitops_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+	int bit_set;
+
+	bitmap_zero(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, test_and_change_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, test_and_change_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, test_bit(params->nr, bitmap));
+
+	bit_set = find_first_bit(bitmap, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, bit_set, BITOPS_LENGTH);
+}
+
+struct order_test_case {
+	const char *str;
+	const unsigned int count;
+	const int expected;
+};
+
+static struct order_test_case order_test_cases[] = {
+	{"0x00000003", 0x00000003,  2},
+	{"0x00000004", 0x00000004,  2},
+	{"0x00001fff", 0x00001fff, 13},
+	{"0x00002000", 0x00002000, 13},
+	{"0x50000000", 0x50000000, 31},
+	{"0x80000000", 0x80000000, 31},
+	{"0x80003000", 0x80003000, 32},
+};
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(order, order_test_cases, str);
+
+static void test_get_count_order(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct order_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_count_order(params->count), params->expected);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_count_order_long(params->count), params->expected);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+struct order_long_test_case {
+	const char *str;
+	const unsigned long count;
+	const int expected;
+};
+
+static struct order_long_test_case order_long_test_cases[] = {
+	{"0x0000000300000000", 0x0000000300000000, 34},
+	{"0x0000000400000000", 0x0000000400000000, 34},
+	{"0x00001fff00000000", 0x00001fff00000000, 45},
+	{"0x0000200000000000", 0x0000200000000000, 45},
+	{"0x5000000000000000", 0x5000000000000000, 63},
+	{"0x8000000000000000", 0x8000000000000000, 63},
+	{"0x8000300000000000", 0x8000300000000000, 64},
+};
+
+KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM_DESC(order_long, order_long_test_cases, str);
+
+static void test_get_count_order_long(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	const struct order_long_test_case *params = test->param_value;
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_count_order_long(params->count), params->expected);
+}
+#endif
+
+static struct kunit_case bitops_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_set_bit_clear_bit, bitops_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_change_bit, bitops_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_test_and_set_bit_test_and_clear_bit, bitops_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_test_and_change_bit, bitops_gen_params),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_get_count_order, order_gen_params),
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(test_get_count_order_long, order_long_gen_params),
+#endif
+	{},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite bitops_test_suite = {
+	.name = "bitops",
+	.test_cases = bitops_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(bitops_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Ryota Sakamoto <sakamo.ryota@gmail.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Bit testing module");