KVM: Don't pre-reserve xarray entries when storing empty/NULL attributesgrafted

Skip the xarray reservation loop when clearing all memory attributes, as
storing NULL only erases the entry and never needs to allocate, so no
reservation (and no cleanup of a failed one) is required in that case.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: David Ballesteros <davimaba.v@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Zeng Chi <zengchi@kylinos.cn>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260921102442.1232375-1-zeng_chi911@163.com
[sean: split to separate patch]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

1 files changed, 186 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/refcount.c b/lib/refcount.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a207a8f22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/refcount.c
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Out-of-line refcount functions.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/refcount.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+
+#define REFCOUNT_WARN(str)	WARN_ONCE(1, "refcount_t: " str ".\n")
+
+void refcount_warn_saturate(refcount_t *r, enum refcount_saturation_type t)
+{
+	refcount_set(r, REFCOUNT_SATURATED);
+
+	switch (t) {
+	case REFCOUNT_ADD_NOT_ZERO_OVF:
+		REFCOUNT_WARN("saturated; leaking memory");
+		break;
+	case REFCOUNT_ADD_OVF:
+		REFCOUNT_WARN("saturated; leaking memory");
+		break;
+	case REFCOUNT_ADD_UAF:
+		REFCOUNT_WARN("addition on 0; use-after-free");
+		break;
+	case REFCOUNT_SUB_UAF:
+		REFCOUNT_WARN("underflow; use-after-free");
+		break;
+	case REFCOUNT_DEC_LEAK:
+		REFCOUNT_WARN("decrement hit 0; leaking memory");
+		break;
+	default:
+		REFCOUNT_WARN("unknown saturation event!?");
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_warn_saturate);
+
+/**
+ * refcount_dec_if_one - decrement a refcount if it is 1
+ * @r: the refcount
+ *
+ * No atomic_t counterpart, it attempts a 1 -> 0 transition and returns the
+ * success thereof.
+ *
+ * Like all decrement operations, it provides release memory order and provides
+ * a control dependency.
+ *
+ * It can be used like a try-delete operator; this explicit case is provided
+ * and not cmpxchg in generic, because that would allow implementing unsafe
+ * operations.
+ *
+ * Return: true if the resulting refcount is 0, false otherwise
+ */
+bool refcount_dec_if_one(refcount_t *r)
+{
+	int val = 1;
+
+	return atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, &val, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_if_one);
+
+/**
+ * refcount_dec_not_one - decrement a refcount if it is not 1
+ * @r: the refcount
+ *
+ * No atomic_t counterpart, it decrements unless the value is 1, in which case
+ * it will return false.
+ *
+ * Was often done like: atomic_add_unless(&var, -1, 1)
+ *
+ * Return: true if the decrement operation was successful, false otherwise
+ */
+bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r)
+{
+	unsigned int new, val = atomic_read(&r->refs);
+
+	do {
+		if (unlikely(val == REFCOUNT_SATURATED))
+			return true;
+
+		if (val == 1)
+			return false;
+
+		new = val - 1;
+		if (new > val) {
+			WARN_ONCE(new > val, "refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.\n");
+			return true;
+		}
+
+	} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&r->refs, &val, new));
+
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_not_one);
+
+/**
+ * refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock - return holding mutex if able to decrement
+ *                               refcount to 0
+ * @r: the refcount
+ * @lock: the mutex to be locked
+ *
+ * Similar to atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(), it will WARN on underflow and fail
+ * to decrement when saturated at REFCOUNT_SATURATED.
+ *
+ * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
+ * before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after.
+ * See the comment on top.
+ *
+ * Return: true and hold mutex if able to decrement refcount to 0, false
+ *         otherwise
+ */
+bool refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock(refcount_t *r, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
+		return false;
+
+	mutex_lock(lock);
+	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
+		mutex_unlock(lock);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_mutex_lock);
+
+/**
+ * refcount_dec_and_lock - return holding spinlock if able to decrement
+ *                         refcount to 0
+ * @r: the refcount
+ * @lock: the spinlock to be locked
+ *
+ * Similar to atomic_dec_and_lock(), it will WARN on underflow and fail to
+ * decrement when saturated at REFCOUNT_SATURATED.
+ *
+ * Provides release memory ordering, such that prior loads and stores are done
+ * before, and provides a control dependency such that free() must come after.
+ * See the comment on top.
+ *
+ * Return: true and hold spinlock if able to decrement refcount to 0, false
+ *         otherwise
+ */
+bool refcount_dec_and_lock(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+	if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
+		return false;
+
+	spin_lock(lock);
+	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
+		spin_unlock(lock);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_lock);
+
+/**
+ * refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave - return holding spinlock with disabled
+ *                                 interrupts if able to decrement refcount to 0
+ * @r: the refcount
+ * @lock: the spinlock to be locked
+ * @flags: saved IRQ-flags if the is acquired
+ *
+ * Same as refcount_dec_and_lock() above except that the spinlock is acquired
+ * with disabled interrupts.
+ *
+ * Return: true and hold spinlock if able to decrement refcount to 0, false
+ *         otherwise
+ */
+bool refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave(refcount_t *r, spinlock_t *lock,
+				   unsigned long *flags)
+{
+	if (refcount_dec_not_one(r))
+		return false;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, *flags);
+	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(r)) {
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, *flags);
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec_and_lock_irqsave);