diff options
| author | Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com> | 2026-09-08 15:37:42 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2026-09-17 09:48:42 +0200 |
| commit | a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255 (patch) | |
| tree | 73fef824f9a846cf935869d0dbc5070ef6e2f741 /lib/plist.c | |
| download | linux-stable-a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255.tar.gz linux-stable-a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255.zip | |
x86/kprobes: Fix crash when probing CS CALL instructionsgrafted
When using eBPF to probe CS CALL instructions within a function,
a crash can be triggered.
The eBPF tool probes offset 257 of the __hrtimer_run_queues()
function:
<__hrtimer_run_queues+249>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
<__hrtimer_run_queues+254>: mov %r14,%rdi
<__hrtimer_run_queues+257>: cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12>
<__hrtimer_run_queues+263>: mov %eax,%r12d
<__hrtimer_run_queues+266>: xchg %ax,%ax
<__hrtimer_run_queues+268>: mov %r13,%rdi
Which triggers this crash:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P
RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230
Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is
at the 6th byte of the above CS CALL instruction. Since the CS CALL
instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that
call instruction.
The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a
function, a kprobe with INT3 is used as the underlying implementation.
During single-step emulation of the original CALL instruction,
int3_emulate_call() assumes that the probed CALL instruction is 5 bytes
long. However, the actual CS-prefixed CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes,
so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU
returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at
the address of the last byte of that CS CALL instruction. Coincidentally,
starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely
different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash.
Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from
the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return
address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro.
[ mingo: Refined the changelog ]
Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step")
Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260908073742.GA10517@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/plist.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/plist.c | 311 |
1 files changed, 311 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/plist.c b/lib/plist.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a5bef38ad --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/plist.c @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * lib/plist.c + * + * Descending-priority-sorted double-linked list + * + * (C) 2002-2003 Intel Corp + * Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>. + * + * 2001-2005 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. + * Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> + * + * (C) 2005 Linutronix GmbH, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org> + * + * Simplifications of the original code by + * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> + * + * Based on simple lists (include/linux/list.h). + * + * This file contains the add / del functions which are considered to + * be too large to inline. See include/linux/plist.h for further + * information. + */ + +#include <linux/bug.h> +#include <linux/plist.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PLIST + +static struct plist_head test_head; + +static void plist_check_prev_next(struct list_head *t, struct list_head *p, + struct list_head *n) +{ + WARN(n->prev != p || p->next != n, + "top: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n" + "prev: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n" + "next: %p, n: %p, p: %p\n", + t, t->next, t->prev, + p, p->next, p->prev, + n, n->next, n->prev); +} + +static void plist_check_list(struct list_head *top) +{ + struct list_head *prev = top, *next = top->next; + + plist_check_prev_next(top, prev, next); + while (next != top) { + prev = next; + next = prev->next; + plist_check_prev_next(top, prev, next); + } +} + +static void plist_check_head(struct plist_head *head) +{ + if (!plist_head_empty(head)) + plist_check_list(&plist_first(head)->prio_list); + plist_check_list(&head->node_list); +} + +#else +# define plist_check_head(h) do { } while (0) +#endif + +/** + * plist_add - add @node to @head + * + * @node: &struct plist_node pointer + * @head: &struct plist_head pointer + */ +void plist_add(struct plist_node *node, struct plist_head *head) +{ + struct plist_node *first, *iter, *prev = NULL, *last, *reverse_iter; + struct list_head *node_next = &head->node_list; + + plist_check_head(head); + WARN_ON(!plist_node_empty(node)); + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&node->prio_list)); + + if (plist_head_empty(head)) + goto ins_node; + + first = iter = plist_first(head); + last = reverse_iter = list_entry(first->prio_list.prev, struct plist_node, prio_list); + + do { + if (node->prio < iter->prio) { + node_next = &iter->node_list; + break; + } else if (node->prio >= reverse_iter->prio) { + prev = reverse_iter; + iter = list_entry(reverse_iter->prio_list.next, + struct plist_node, prio_list); + if (likely(reverse_iter != last)) + node_next = &iter->node_list; + break; + } + + prev = iter; + iter = list_entry(iter->prio_list.next, + struct plist_node, prio_list); + reverse_iter = list_entry(reverse_iter->prio_list.prev, + struct plist_node, prio_list); + } while (iter != first); + + if (!prev || prev->prio != node->prio) + list_add_tail(&node->prio_list, &iter->prio_list); +ins_node: + list_add_tail(&node->node_list, node_next); + + plist_check_head(head); +} + +/** + * plist_del - Remove a @node from plist. + * + * @node: &struct plist_node pointer - entry to be removed + * @head: &struct plist_head pointer - list head + */ +void plist_del(struct plist_node *node, struct plist_head *head) +{ + plist_check_head(head); + + if (!list_empty(&node->prio_list)) { + if (node->node_list.next != &head->node_list) { + struct plist_node *next; + + next = list_entry(node->node_list.next, + struct plist_node, node_list); + + /* add the next plist_node into prio_list */ + if (list_empty(&next->prio_list)) + list_add(&next->prio_list, &node->prio_list); + } + list_del_init(&node->prio_list); + } + + list_del_init(&node->node_list); + + plist_check_head(head); +} + +/** + * plist_requeue - Requeue @node at end of same-prio entries. + * + * This is essentially an optimized plist_del() followed by + * plist_add(). It moves an entry already in the plist to + * after any other same-priority entries. + * + * @node: &struct plist_node pointer - entry to be moved + * @head: &struct plist_head pointer - list head + */ +void plist_requeue(struct plist_node *node, struct plist_head *head) +{ + struct plist_node *iter; + struct list_head *node_next = &head->node_list; + + plist_check_head(head); + BUG_ON(plist_head_empty(head)); + BUG_ON(plist_node_empty(node)); + + if (node == plist_last(head)) + return; + + iter = plist_next(node); + + if (node->prio != iter->prio) + return; + + plist_del(node, head); + + /* + * After plist_del(), iter is the replacement of the node. If the node + * was on prio_list, take shortcut to find node_next instead of looping. + */ + if (!list_empty(&iter->prio_list)) { + iter = list_entry(iter->prio_list.next, struct plist_node, + prio_list); + node_next = &iter->node_list; + goto queue; + } + + plist_for_each_continue(iter, head) { + if (node->prio != iter->prio) { + node_next = &iter->node_list; + break; + } + } +queue: + list_add_tail(&node->node_list, node_next); + + plist_check_head(head); +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PLIST +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/sched/clock.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/init.h> + +static struct plist_node __initdata test_node[241]; + +static void __init plist_test_check(int nr_expect) +{ + struct plist_node *first, *prio_pos, *node_pos; + + if (plist_head_empty(&test_head)) { + BUG_ON(nr_expect != 0); + return; + } + + prio_pos = first = plist_first(&test_head); + plist_for_each(node_pos, &test_head) { + if (nr_expect-- < 0) + break; + if (node_pos == first) + continue; + if (node_pos->prio == prio_pos->prio) { + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node_pos->prio_list)); + continue; + } + + BUG_ON(prio_pos->prio > node_pos->prio); + BUG_ON(prio_pos->prio_list.next != &node_pos->prio_list); + prio_pos = node_pos; + } + + BUG_ON(nr_expect != 0); + BUG_ON(prio_pos->prio_list.next != &first->prio_list); +} + +static void __init plist_test_requeue(struct plist_node *node) +{ + plist_requeue(node, &test_head); + + if (node != plist_last(&test_head)) + BUG_ON(node->prio == plist_next(node)->prio); +} + +static int __init plist_test(void) +{ + int nr_expect = 0, i, loop; + unsigned int r = local_clock(); + + printk(KERN_DEBUG "start plist test\n"); + plist_head_init(&test_head); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node); i++) + plist_node_init(test_node + i, 0); + + for (loop = 0; loop < 1000; loop++) { + r = r * 193939 % 47629; + i = r % ARRAY_SIZE(test_node); + if (plist_node_empty(test_node + i)) { + r = r * 193939 % 47629; + test_node[i].prio = r % 99; + plist_add(test_node + i, &test_head); + nr_expect++; + } else { + plist_del(test_node + i, &test_head); + nr_expect--; + } + plist_test_check(nr_expect); + if (!plist_node_empty(test_node + i)) { + plist_test_requeue(test_node + i); + plist_test_check(nr_expect); + } + } + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node); i++) { + if (plist_node_empty(test_node + i)) + continue; + plist_del(test_node + i, &test_head); + nr_expect--; + plist_test_check(nr_expect); + } + + printk(KERN_DEBUG "end plist test\n"); + + /* Worst case test for plist_add() */ + unsigned int test_data[241]; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); i++) + test_data[i] = i; + + ktime_t start, end, time_elapsed = 0; + + plist_head_init(&test_head); + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node); i++) { + plist_node_init(test_node + i, 0); + test_node[i].prio = test_data[i]; + } + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_node); i++) { + if (plist_node_empty(test_node + i)) { + start = ktime_get(); + plist_add(test_node + i, &test_head); + end = ktime_get(); + time_elapsed += (end - start); + } + } + + pr_debug("plist_add worst case test time elapsed %lld\n", time_elapsed); + return 0; +} + +module_init(plist_test); + +#endif |
