objtool: Validate disassembler headers in libopcodes probegrafted

commit 3f2de814c059 ("objtool: Fix libopcodes linking with static libraries")
tested for libopcodes availability by linking a test snippet with a forward
declaration of disassemble_init_for_target().

However, testing symbol linkage with an extern declaration only verifies
the presence of the library (.so/.a) and bypasses checking for development
headers (binutils-dev). On systems where libopcodes is present without
development headers installed, the probe succeeds, enabling BUILD_DISAS.
Subsequent compilation of objtool then fails:

  fatal error: 'bfd.h' file not found
    113 | #include <bfd.h>

Additionally, the probe invokes $(HOSTCC) without $(HOSTCFLAGS), ignoring
any sysroot or include flags specified for the host compiler.

Fix this by including <bfd.h> and <dis-asm.h> directly in the test snippet,
passing $(HOSTCFLAGS) so host compiler options are respected, and defining
PACKAGE="objtool" to satisfy the configuration check in <bfd.h>.

Fixes: 3f2de814c059 ("objtool: Fix libopcodes linking with static libraries")
Fixes: 436326bc525d ("objtool: fix build failure due to missing libopcodes check")
Reported-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Assisted-by: Antigravity:Gemini-Next
Signed-off-by: Ulises Mendez Martinez <umendez@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260904150710.2997558-1-umendez@google.com
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c b/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6cb4adbb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/limits.h>
+#include <linux/math.h>
+#include <linux/minmax.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#include <linux/reciprocal_div.h>
+
+/*
+ * For a description of the algorithm please have a look at
+ * include/linux/reciprocal_div.h
+ */
+
+struct reciprocal_value reciprocal_value(u32 d)
+{
+	struct reciprocal_value R;
+	u64 m;
+	int l;
+
+	l = fls(d - 1);
+	m = ((1ULL << 32) * ((1ULL << l) - d));
+	do_div(m, d);
+	++m;
+	R.m = (u32)m;
+	R.sh1 = min(l, 1);
+	R.sh2 = max(l - 1, 0);
+
+	return R;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(reciprocal_value);
+
+struct reciprocal_value_adv reciprocal_value_adv(u32 d, u8 prec)
+{
+	struct reciprocal_value_adv R;
+	u32 l, post_shift;
+	u64 mhigh, mlow;
+
+	/* ceil(log2(d)) */
+	l = fls(d - 1);
+	/* NOTE: mlow/mhigh could overflow u64 when l == 32. This case needs to
+	 * be handled before calling "reciprocal_value_adv", please see the
+	 * comment at include/linux/reciprocal_div.h.
+	 */
+	WARN(l == 32,
+	     "ceil(log2(0x%08x)) == 32, %s doesn't support such divisor",
+	     d, __func__);
+	post_shift = l;
+	mlow = 1ULL << (32 + l);
+	do_div(mlow, d);
+	mhigh = (1ULL << (32 + l)) + (1ULL << (32 + l - prec));
+	do_div(mhigh, d);
+
+	for (; post_shift > 0; post_shift--) {
+		u64 lo = mlow >> 1, hi = mhigh >> 1;
+
+		if (lo >= hi)
+			break;
+
+		mlow = lo;
+		mhigh = hi;
+	}
+
+	R.m = (u32)mhigh;
+	R.sh = post_shift;
+	R.exp = l;
+	R.is_wide_m = mhigh > U32_MAX;
+
+	return R;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(reciprocal_value_adv);