summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /lib/math/reciprocal_div.c
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/math/reciprocal_div.c')
-rw-r--r--lib/math/reciprocal_div.c73
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c b/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6cb4adbb8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/bug.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/limits.h>
+#include <linux/math.h>
+#include <linux/minmax.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#include <linux/reciprocal_div.h>
+
+/*
+ * For a description of the algorithm please have a look at
+ * include/linux/reciprocal_div.h
+ */
+
+struct reciprocal_value reciprocal_value(u32 d)
+{
+ struct reciprocal_value R;
+ u64 m;
+ int l;
+
+ l = fls(d - 1);
+ m = ((1ULL << 32) * ((1ULL << l) - d));
+ do_div(m, d);
+ ++m;
+ R.m = (u32)m;
+ R.sh1 = min(l, 1);
+ R.sh2 = max(l - 1, 0);
+
+ return R;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(reciprocal_value);
+
+struct reciprocal_value_adv reciprocal_value_adv(u32 d, u8 prec)
+{
+ struct reciprocal_value_adv R;
+ u32 l, post_shift;
+ u64 mhigh, mlow;
+
+ /* ceil(log2(d)) */
+ l = fls(d - 1);
+ /* NOTE: mlow/mhigh could overflow u64 when l == 32. This case needs to
+ * be handled before calling "reciprocal_value_adv", please see the
+ * comment at include/linux/reciprocal_div.h.
+ */
+ WARN(l == 32,
+ "ceil(log2(0x%08x)) == 32, %s doesn't support such divisor",
+ d, __func__);
+ post_shift = l;
+ mlow = 1ULL << (32 + l);
+ do_div(mlow, d);
+ mhigh = (1ULL << (32 + l)) + (1ULL << (32 + l - prec));
+ do_div(mhigh, d);
+
+ for (; post_shift > 0; post_shift--) {
+ u64 lo = mlow >> 1, hi = mhigh >> 1;
+
+ if (lo >= hi)
+ break;
+
+ mlow = lo;
+ mhigh = hi;
+ }
+
+ R.m = (u32)mhigh;
+ R.sh = post_shift;
+ R.exp = l;
+ R.is_wide_m = mhigh > U32_MAX;
+
+ return R;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(reciprocal_value_adv);