diff options
| author | Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org> | 2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> | 2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700 |
| commit | 3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch) | |
| tree | c65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /lib/math/reciprocal_div.c | |
| download | linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip | |
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc()
family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in
scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci
This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first
kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the
first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h
scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's
"--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped
to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control
flow indicator I could find.
Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc,
riscv, and s390 with no new warnings.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1]
Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2]
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/math/reciprocal_div.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/math/reciprocal_div.c | 73 |
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c b/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6cb4adbb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/math/reciprocal_div.c @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <linux/bug.h> +#include <linux/export.h> +#include <linux/limits.h> +#include <linux/math.h> +#include <linux/minmax.h> +#include <linux/types.h> + +#include <linux/reciprocal_div.h> + +/* + * For a description of the algorithm please have a look at + * include/linux/reciprocal_div.h + */ + +struct reciprocal_value reciprocal_value(u32 d) +{ + struct reciprocal_value R; + u64 m; + int l; + + l = fls(d - 1); + m = ((1ULL << 32) * ((1ULL << l) - d)); + do_div(m, d); + ++m; + R.m = (u32)m; + R.sh1 = min(l, 1); + R.sh2 = max(l - 1, 0); + + return R; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(reciprocal_value); + +struct reciprocal_value_adv reciprocal_value_adv(u32 d, u8 prec) +{ + struct reciprocal_value_adv R; + u32 l, post_shift; + u64 mhigh, mlow; + + /* ceil(log2(d)) */ + l = fls(d - 1); + /* NOTE: mlow/mhigh could overflow u64 when l == 32. This case needs to + * be handled before calling "reciprocal_value_adv", please see the + * comment at include/linux/reciprocal_div.h. + */ + WARN(l == 32, + "ceil(log2(0x%08x)) == 32, %s doesn't support such divisor", + d, __func__); + post_shift = l; + mlow = 1ULL << (32 + l); + do_div(mlow, d); + mhigh = (1ULL << (32 + l)) + (1ULL << (32 + l - prec)); + do_div(mhigh, d); + + for (; post_shift > 0; post_shift--) { + u64 lo = mlow >> 1, hi = mhigh >> 1; + + if (lo >= hi) + break; + + mlow = lo; + mhigh = hi; + } + + R.m = (u32)mhigh; + R.sh = post_shift; + R.exp = l; + R.is_wide_m = mhigh > U32_MAX; + + return R; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(reciprocal_value_adv); |
