diff options
| author | Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> | 2026-09-23 09:37:21 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2026-09-26 00:39:55 -0400 |
| commit | 93de2a6a4b91b72607136dd656edf03fb399d27f (patch) | |
| tree | 9220c76eb23cb39a146fac9692ee69afa4aa3135 /lib/lwq.c | |
| download | linux-stable-93de2a6a4b91b72607136dd656edf03fb399d27f.tar.gz linux-stable-93de2a6a4b91b72607136dd656edf03fb399d27f.zip | |
KVM: SEV: Do cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host migrationgrafted
Manually perform cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host
migration to ensure no stale data is left in CPU caches after the VM is
destroyed. Because the source VM is "converted" to a non-SEV VM, KVM's
memory reclaim flows won't trigger cache maintenance, e.g. when all guest
memory is reclaimed in response to detaching from the mmu_notifier.
Note, relying on the destination VM to do cache maintenance isn't an option
as KVM doesn't require identical guest memory configurations, i.e. the
source VM may have access to memory that the destination VM does not.
Enforcing equivalent memory configurations is infeasible, as it would
require a *deep* comparison of memslots, e.g. to verify that not only are
the memslot identical, but what the memslots point at is also identical.
Fixes: b56639318bb2 ("KVM: SEV: Add support for SEV intra host migration")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Stefan Teodorescu <fane@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-ID: <20260923163721.1584779-3-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/lwq.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/lwq.c | 158 |
1 files changed, 158 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/lwq.c b/lib/lwq.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c1e11ba6f --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/lwq.c @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Light-weight single-linked queue. + * + * Entries are enqueued to the head of an llist, with no blocking. + * This can happen in any context. + * + * Entries are dequeued using a spinlock to protect against multiple + * access. The llist is staged in reverse order, and refreshed + * from the llist when it exhausts. + * + * This is particularly suitable when work items are queued in BH or + * IRQ context, and where work items are handled one at a time by + * dedicated threads. + */ +#include <linux/rcupdate.h> +#include <linux/lwq.h> + +struct llist_node *__lwq_dequeue(struct lwq *q) +{ + struct llist_node *this; + + if (lwq_empty(q)) + return NULL; + spin_lock(&q->lock); + this = q->ready; + if (!this && !llist_empty(&q->new)) { + /* ensure queue doesn't appear transiently lwq_empty */ + smp_store_release(&q->ready, (void *)1); + this = llist_reverse_order(llist_del_all(&q->new)); + if (!this) + q->ready = NULL; + } + if (this) + q->ready = llist_next(this); + spin_unlock(&q->lock); + return this; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__lwq_dequeue); + +/** + * lwq_dequeue_all - dequeue all currently enqueued objects + * @q: the queue to dequeue from + * + * Remove and return a linked list of llist_nodes of all the objects that were + * in the queue. The first on the list will be the object that was least + * recently enqueued. + */ +struct llist_node *lwq_dequeue_all(struct lwq *q) +{ + struct llist_node *r, *t, **ep; + + if (lwq_empty(q)) + return NULL; + + spin_lock(&q->lock); + r = q->ready; + q->ready = NULL; + t = llist_del_all(&q->new); + spin_unlock(&q->lock); + ep = &r; + while (*ep) + ep = &(*ep)->next; + *ep = llist_reverse_order(t); + return r; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lwq_dequeue_all); + +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LWQ_TEST) + +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/wait_bit.h> +#include <linux/kthread.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +struct tnode { + struct lwq_node n; + int i; + int c; +}; + +static int lwq_exercise(void *qv) +{ + struct lwq *q = qv; + int cnt; + struct tnode *t; + + for (cnt = 0; cnt < 10000; cnt++) { + wait_var_event(q, (t = lwq_dequeue(q, struct tnode, n)) != NULL); + t->c++; + if (lwq_enqueue(&t->n, q)) + wake_up_var(q); + } + while (!kthread_should_stop()) + schedule_timeout_idle(1); + return 0; +} + +static int lwq_test(void) +{ + int i; + struct lwq q; + struct llist_node *l, **t1, *t2; + struct tnode *t; + struct task_struct *threads[8]; + + printk(KERN_INFO "testing lwq....\n"); + lwq_init(&q); + printk(KERN_INFO " lwq: run some threads\n"); + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(threads); i++) + threads[i] = kthread_run(lwq_exercise, &q, "lwq-test-%d", i); + for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) { + t = kmalloc_obj(*t); + if (!t) + break; + t->i = i; + t->c = 0; + if (lwq_enqueue(&t->n, &q)) + wake_up_var(&q); + } + /* wait for threads to exit */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(threads); i++) + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(threads[i])) + kthread_stop(threads[i]); + printk(KERN_INFO " lwq: dequeue first 50:"); + for (i = 0; i < 50 ; i++) { + if (i && (i % 10) == 0) { + printk(KERN_CONT "\n"); + printk(KERN_INFO " lwq: ... "); + } + t = lwq_dequeue(&q, struct tnode, n); + if (t) + printk(KERN_CONT " %d(%d)", t->i, t->c); + kfree(t); + } + printk(KERN_CONT "\n"); + l = lwq_dequeue_all(&q); + printk(KERN_INFO " lwq: delete the multiples of 3 (test lwq_for_each_safe())\n"); + lwq_for_each_safe(t, t1, t2, &l, n) { + if ((t->i % 3) == 0) { + t->i = -1; + kfree(t); + t = NULL; + } + } + if (l) + lwq_enqueue_batch(l, &q); + printk(KERN_INFO " lwq: dequeue remaining:"); + while ((t = lwq_dequeue(&q, struct tnode, n)) != NULL) { + printk(KERN_CONT " %d", t->i); + kfree(t); + } + printk(KERN_CONT "\n"); + return 0; +} + +module_init(lwq_test); +#endif /* CONFIG_LWQ_TEST*/ |
