selftests/ftrace: Fix unique symbol check in kprobe_non_uniq_symbol.tcgrafted

The current regex also matches symbols in modules, which makes the
test fail on s390 where name_show is present only once in the kernel,
but also multiple times in modules:

000001b1401cdc20 t name_show
000001b0c05e6c40 t name_show    [mdev]
000001b0c0495f30 t name_show    [i2c_core]

Fix this by changing the regular expression to only match the function
name.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909092954.2200558-1-svens@linux.ibm.com/

Fixes: 03b80ff8023a ("selftests/ftrace: Add new test case which checks non unique symbol")
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 94 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/llist.c b/lib/llist.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f574c17a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/llist.c
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Lock-less NULL terminated single linked list
+ *
+ * The basic atomic operation of this list is cmpxchg on long.  On
+ * architectures that don't have NMI-safe cmpxchg implementation, the
+ * list can NOT be used in NMI handlers.  So code that uses the list in
+ * an NMI handler should depend on CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2010,2011 Intel Corp.
+ *   Author: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
+ */
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/llist.h>
+
+/**
+ * llist_del_first - delete the first entry of lock-less list
+ * @head:	the head for your lock-less list
+ *
+ * If list is empty, return NULL, otherwise, return the first entry
+ * deleted, this is the newest added one.
+ *
+ * Only one llist_del_first user can be used simultaneously with
+ * multiple llist_add users without lock.  Because otherwise
+ * llist_del_first, llist_add, llist_add (or llist_del_all, llist_add,
+ * llist_add) sequence in another user may change @head->first->next,
+ * but keep @head->first.  If multiple consumers are needed, please
+ * use llist_del_all or use lock between consumers.
+ */
+struct llist_node *llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head)
+{
+	struct llist_node *entry, *next;
+
+	entry = smp_load_acquire(&head->first);
+	do {
+		if (entry == NULL)
+			return NULL;
+		next = READ_ONCE(entry->next);
+	} while (!try_cmpxchg(&head->first, &entry, next));
+
+	return entry;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(llist_del_first);
+
+/**
+ * llist_del_first_this - delete given entry of lock-less list if it is first
+ * @head:	the head for your lock-less list
+ * @this:	a list entry.
+ *
+ * If head of the list is given entry, delete and return %true else
+ * return %false.
+ *
+ * Multiple callers can safely call this concurrently with multiple
+ * llist_add() callers, providing all the callers offer a different @this.
+ */
+bool llist_del_first_this(struct llist_head *head,
+			  struct llist_node *this)
+{
+	struct llist_node *entry, *next;
+
+	/* acquire ensures orderig wrt try_cmpxchg() is llist_del_first() */
+	entry = smp_load_acquire(&head->first);
+	do {
+		if (entry != this)
+			return false;
+		next = READ_ONCE(entry->next);
+	} while (!try_cmpxchg(&head->first, &entry, next));
+
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(llist_del_first_this);
+
+/**
+ * llist_reverse_order - reverse order of a llist chain
+ * @head:	first item of the list to be reversed
+ *
+ * Reverse the order of a chain of llist entries and return the
+ * new first entry.
+ */
+struct llist_node *llist_reverse_order(struct llist_node *head)
+{
+	struct llist_node *new_head = NULL;
+
+	while (head) {
+		struct llist_node *tmp = head;
+		head = head->next;
+		tmp->next = new_head;
+		new_head = tmp;
+	}
+
+	return new_head;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(llist_reverse_order);