diff options
| author | Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com> | 2026-09-17 14:00:52 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com> | 2026-09-30 18:59:55 +0100 |
| commit | e8dd273d199f5bbe295a8e3d8b777c5505b6b2e1 (patch) | |
| tree | 767c7e109d3e6b9ec6549e99dfec9085d01318ad /lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | |
| download | linux-stable-e8dd273d199f5bbe295a8e3d8b777c5505b6b2e1.tar.gz linux-stable-e8dd273d199f5bbe295a8e3d8b777c5505b6b2e1.zip | |
iio: proximity: isl29501: Fix return type of isl29501_register_writegrafted
isl29501_register_write() was returning a u32 instead of an int.
Since the function returns negative error codes (such as -ERANGE or
return values from i2c_smbus_write_byte_data()), returning an unsigned
integer type prevents callers from correctly checking for negative error
conditions.
Fix this by changing the function return type from u32 to int.
This was found through manual code review.
Fixes: 1c28799257bc ("iio: light: isl29501: Add support for the ISL29501 ToF sensor.")
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki <salah.triki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Joshua Crofts <joshua.crofts1@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c | 198 |
1 files changed, 198 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c b/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7a2a59c6a --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/kunit/backtrace-suppression-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test for suppressing warning tracebacks. + * + * Copyright (C) 2024, Guenter Roeck + * Author: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> + */ + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <linux/bug.h> +#include <linux/completion.h> +#include <linux/kthread.h> + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct(struct kunit *test) +{ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed"); + /* + * Count must be checked inside the scope; the handle + * is not accessible after the block exits. + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, 1); + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, kunit_has_active_suppress_warning()); +} + +static noinline void trigger_backtrace_warn(void) +{ + WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed"); +} + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect(struct kunit *test) +{ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + trigger_backtrace_warn(); + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, 1); + } +} + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi(struct kunit *test) +{ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + WARN(1, "This backtrace should be suppressed"); + trigger_backtrace_warn(); + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, 2); + } +} + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct(struct kunit *test) +{ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KALLSYMS)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE or CONFIG_KALLSYMS"); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + WARN_ON(1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, 1); + } +} + +static noinline void trigger_backtrace_warn_on(void) +{ + WARN_ON(1); +} + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect(struct kunit *test) +{ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE"); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + trigger_backtrace_warn_on(); + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, 1); + } +} + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_count(struct kunit *test) +{ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, 0); + + WARN(1, "suppressed"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, 1); + + WARN(1, "suppressed again"); + KUNIT_EXPECT_SUPPRESSED_WARNING_COUNT(test, 2); + } +} + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_active_state(struct kunit *test) +{ + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, kunit_has_active_suppress_warning()); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kunit_has_active_suppress_warning()); + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, kunit_has_active_suppress_warning()); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kunit_has_active_suppress_warning()); + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, kunit_has_active_suppress_warning()); +} + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_multi_scope(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit_suppressed_warning *sw1, *sw2; + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BUG)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_BUG"); + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE)) + kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE"); + + sw1 = kunit_start_suppress_warning(test); + trigger_backtrace_warn_on(); + WARN(1, "suppressed by sw1"); + kunit_end_suppress_warning(test, sw1); + + sw2 = kunit_start_suppress_warning(test); + WARN(1, "suppressed by sw2"); + kunit_end_suppress_warning(test, sw2); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kunit_suppressed_warning_count(sw1), 2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kunit_suppressed_warning_count(sw2), 1); +} + +struct cross_kthread_data { + bool was_active; + struct completion done; +}; + +static int cross_kthread_fn(void *data) +{ + struct cross_kthread_data *d = data; + + d->was_active = kunit_has_active_suppress_warning(); + complete(&d->done); + while (!kthread_should_stop()) + schedule(); + return 0; +} + +static void backtrace_suppression_test_cross_kthread(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct cross_kthread_data data; + struct task_struct *task; + + data.was_active = false; + init_completion(&data.done); + + kunit_warning_suppress(test) { + task = kthread_run(cross_kthread_fn, &data, "kunit-cross-test"); + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(task)); + wait_for_completion(&data.done); + kthread_stop(task); + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, data.was_active); +} + +static struct kunit_case backtrace_suppression_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_direct), + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_indirect), + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_multi), + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_direct), + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_warn_on_indirect), + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_count), + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_active_state), + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_multi_scope), + KUNIT_CASE(backtrace_suppression_test_cross_kthread), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite backtrace_suppression_test_suite = { + .name = "backtrace-suppression-test", + .test_cases = backtrace_suppression_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suites(&backtrace_suppression_test_suite); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit test to verify warning backtrace suppression"); |
