diff options
| author | Muhammad Bilal <meatuni001@gmail.com> | 2026-07-28 17:54:55 +0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2026-09-01 12:15:16 +0200 |
| commit | ff917923f4fb9c83717ba135ee47d7e4c1567bb7 (patch) | |
| tree | c38fd8fcf58e1937b17fdbc6518b6f8b797fc15a /lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | |
| download | linux-stable-ff917923f4fb9c83717ba135ee47d7e4c1567bb7.tar.gz linux-stable-ff917923f4fb9c83717ba135ee47d7e4c1567bb7.zip | |
staging: rtl8723bs: fix OOB read in rtw_action_frame_parse()grafted
rtw_action_frame_parse() takes a frame_len parameter but never
actually checks it before indexing into the frame body:
const u8 *frame_body = frame + sizeof(struct ieee80211_hdr_3addr);
...
c = frame_body[0];
...
a = frame_body[1];
frame_body already points 24 bytes (sizeof(struct
ieee80211_hdr_3addr)) into frame, so reading frame_body[0] and
frame_body[1] requires frame_len >= 26. A management action frame
shorter than that (e.g. exactly 24 bytes, the minimum a malicious
peer can send) causes a 1-2 byte out-of-bounds read.
This is reachable from rtw_cfg80211_monitor_if_xmit_entry() and
cfg80211_rtw_mgmt_tx() in ioctl_cfg80211.c, both of which pass
attacker/user-influenced frame buffers and lengths straight through.
Add the missing length check before frame_body is dereferenced.
Fixes: 554c0a3abf216 ("staging: Add rtl8723bs sdio wifi driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Bilal <meatuni001@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260728125456.32359-3-meatuni001@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/find_bit_benchmark.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 218 |
1 files changed, 218 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..05305e655 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Test for find_*_bit functions. + * + * Copyright (c) 2017 Cavium. + */ + +/* + * find_bit functions are widely used in kernel, so the successful boot + * is good enough test for correctness. + * + * This test is focused on performance of traversing bitmaps. Two typical + * scenarios are reproduced: + * - randomly filled bitmap with approximately equal number of set and + * cleared bits; + * - sparse bitmap with few set bits at random positions. + */ + +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/printk.h> +#include <linux/random.h> + +#define BITMAP_LEN (4096UL * 8 * 10) +#define SPARSE 500 + +static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata; +static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata; + +/* + * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm. + */ +static int __init test_find_first_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata; + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) { + i = find_first_bit(cp, len); + __clear_bit(i, cp); + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_first_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_first_and_bit(const void *bitmap, const void *bitmap2, + unsigned long len) +{ + static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata; + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) { + i = find_first_and_bit(cp, bitmap2, len); + __clear_bit(i, cp); + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_first_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_next_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++) + i = find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, i) + 1; + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_next_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_next_zero_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++) + i = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, len, i) + 1; + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_next_zero_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_last_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long l, cnt = 0; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + do { + cnt++; + l = find_last_bit(bitmap, len); + if (l >= len) + break; + len = l; + } while (len); + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_last_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_nth_bit(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long l, n, w = bitmap_weight(bitmap, len); + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (n = 0; n < w; n++) { + l = find_nth_bit(bitmap, len, n); + WARN_ON(l >= len); + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_nth_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, w); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_next_and_bit(const void *bitmap, + const void *bitmap2, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++) + i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i + 1); + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_next_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init +test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++) + i = bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, i, 8, 0, 0) + 1; + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off:%7llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init find_bit_test(void) +{ + unsigned long nbits = BITMAP_LEN / SPARSE; + + pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap\n"); + + get_random_bytes(bitmap, sizeof(bitmap)); + get_random_bytes(bitmap2, sizeof(bitmap2)); + + test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_nth_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10); + + /* + * test_find_first_bit() may take some time, so + * traverse only part of bitmap to avoid soft lockup. + */ + test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10); + test_find_first_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN / 2); + test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); + + pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap\n"); + + bitmap_zero(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + bitmap_zero(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); + + while (nbits--) { + __set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap); + __set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap2); + } + + test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_nth_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_first_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); + + /* + * Everything is OK. Return error just to let user run benchmark + * again without annoying rmmod. + */ + return -EINVAL; +} +module_init(find_bit_test); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test for find_*_bit functions"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); |
