summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>2026-09-04 10:43:19 +0200
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2026-09-04 07:58:36 -0700
commit6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722 (patch)
tree58e8288fead484f6755ad0815fc74c3742663761 /lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
downloadlinux-stable-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.tar.gz
linux-stable-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.zip
selftests/bpf: Reject graph kptr use after RCU unlockgrafted
Add a sleepable verifier test that loads a graph-node local kptr in an explicit RCU read-side critical section, then passes its node to bpf_rbtree_remove() after the section ends. Before the verifier fix, the stale NON_OWN_REF flag makes the node look like a live borrowed reference and the program is accepted. After the fix, the pointer is demoted without NON_OWN_REF and the graph kfunc argument is rejected. Also exercise a graph kptr loaded while a spin lock provides implicit RCU protection. The pointer must be invalidated when the lock is released, which guards the required ordering between non-owning-reference invalidation and RCU demotion. Update the existing fault-protected load test state description. The post-unlock pointer no longer carries NON_OWN_REF, but remains readable because the load is rewritten to use BPF_PROBE_MEM. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904084325.52250-7-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/find_bit_benchmark.c')
-rw-r--r--lib/find_bit_benchmark.c201
1 files changed, 201 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..00d9dc61c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Test for find_*_bit functions.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2017 Cavium.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * find_bit functions are widely used in kernel, so the successful boot
+ * is good enough test for correctness.
+ *
+ * This test is focused on performance of traversing bitmaps. Two typical
+ * scenarios are reproduced:
+ * - randomly filled bitmap with approximately equal number of set and
+ * cleared bits;
+ * - sparse bitmap with few set bits at random positions.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/printk.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
+
+#define BITMAP_LEN (4096UL * 8 * 10)
+#define SPARSE 500
+
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
+
+/*
+ * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm.
+ */
+static int __init test_find_first_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) {
+ i = find_first_bit(cp, len);
+ __clear_bit(i, cp);
+ }
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_first_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_first_and_bit(const void *bitmap, const void *bitmap2,
+ unsigned long len)
+{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) {
+ i = find_first_and_bit(cp, bitmap2, len);
+ __clear_bit(i, cp);
+ }
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_first_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_next_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
+ i = find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, i) + 1;
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_next_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_next_zero_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
+ i = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, len, i) + 1;
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_next_zero_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_last_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long l, cnt = 0;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ do {
+ cnt++;
+ l = find_last_bit(bitmap, len);
+ if (l >= len)
+ break;
+ len = l;
+ } while (len);
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_last_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_nth_bit(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long l, n, w = bitmap_weight(bitmap, len);
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (n = 0; n < w; n++) {
+ l = find_nth_bit(bitmap, len, n);
+ WARN_ON(l >= len);
+ }
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_nth_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, w);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_next_and_bit(const void *bitmap,
+ const void *bitmap2, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
+ i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i + 1);
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_next_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init find_bit_test(void)
+{
+ unsigned long nbits = BITMAP_LEN / SPARSE;
+
+ pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap\n");
+
+ get_random_bytes(bitmap, sizeof(bitmap));
+ get_random_bytes(bitmap2, sizeof(bitmap2));
+
+ test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_nth_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10);
+
+ /*
+ * test_find_first_bit() may take some time, so
+ * traverse only part of bitmap to avoid soft lockup.
+ */
+ test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10);
+ test_find_first_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN / 2);
+ test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap\n");
+
+ bitmap_zero(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ bitmap_zero(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ while (nbits--) {
+ __set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap);
+ __set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap2);
+ }
+
+ test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_nth_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_first_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ /*
+ * Everything is OK. Return error just to let user run benchmark
+ * again without annoying rmmod.
+ */
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+module_init(find_bit_test);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test for find_*_bit functions");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");