diff options
| author | Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> | 2026-09-04 10:43:19 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2026-09-04 07:58:36 -0700 |
| commit | 6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722 (patch) | |
| tree | 58e8288fead484f6755ad0815fc74c3742663761 /lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | |
| download | linux-stable-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.tar.gz linux-stable-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.zip | |
selftests/bpf: Reject graph kptr use after RCU unlockgrafted
Add a sleepable verifier test that loads a graph-node local kptr in an
explicit RCU read-side critical section, then passes its node to
bpf_rbtree_remove() after the section ends.
Before the verifier fix, the stale NON_OWN_REF flag makes the node look like
a live borrowed reference and the program is accepted. After the fix, the
pointer is demoted without NON_OWN_REF and the graph kfunc argument is
rejected.
Also exercise a graph kptr loaded while a spin lock provides implicit RCU
protection. The pointer must be invalidated when the lock is released, which
guards the required ordering between non-owning-reference invalidation and
RCU demotion.
Update the existing fault-protected load test state description. The
post-unlock pointer no longer carries NON_OWN_REF, but remains readable
because the load is rewritten to use BPF_PROBE_MEM.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904084325.52250-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/find_bit_benchmark.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/find_bit_benchmark.c | 201 |
1 files changed, 201 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..00d9dc61c --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Test for find_*_bit functions. + * + * Copyright (c) 2017 Cavium. + */ + +/* + * find_bit functions are widely used in kernel, so the successful boot + * is good enough test for correctness. + * + * This test is focused on performance of traversing bitmaps. Two typical + * scenarios are reproduced: + * - randomly filled bitmap with approximately equal number of set and + * cleared bits; + * - sparse bitmap with few set bits at random positions. + */ + +#include <linux/bitops.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/printk.h> +#include <linux/random.h> + +#define BITMAP_LEN (4096UL * 8 * 10) +#define SPARSE 500 + +static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata; +static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata; + +/* + * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm. + */ +static int __init test_find_first_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata; + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) { + i = find_first_bit(cp, len); + __clear_bit(i, cp); + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_first_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_first_and_bit(const void *bitmap, const void *bitmap2, + unsigned long len) +{ + static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata; + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) { + i = find_first_and_bit(cp, bitmap2, len); + __clear_bit(i, cp); + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_first_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_next_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++) + i = find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, i) + 1; + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_next_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_next_zero_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++) + i = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, len, i) + 1; + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_next_zero_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_last_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long l, cnt = 0; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + do { + cnt++; + l = find_last_bit(bitmap, len); + if (l >= len) + break; + len = l; + } while (len); + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_last_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_nth_bit(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long l, n, w = bitmap_weight(bitmap, len); + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (n = 0; n < w; n++) { + l = find_nth_bit(bitmap, len, n); + WARN_ON(l >= len); + } + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_nth_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, w); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init test_find_next_and_bit(const void *bitmap, + const void *bitmap2, unsigned long len) +{ + unsigned long i, cnt; + ktime_t time; + + time = ktime_get(); + for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++) + i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i + 1); + time = ktime_get() - time; + pr_err("find_next_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt); + + return 0; +} + +static int __init find_bit_test(void) +{ + unsigned long nbits = BITMAP_LEN / SPARSE; + + pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap\n"); + + get_random_bytes(bitmap, sizeof(bitmap)); + get_random_bytes(bitmap2, sizeof(bitmap2)); + + test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_nth_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10); + + /* + * test_find_first_bit() may take some time, so + * traverse only part of bitmap to avoid soft lockup. + */ + test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10); + test_find_first_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN / 2); + test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); + + pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap\n"); + + bitmap_zero(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + bitmap_zero(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); + + while (nbits--) { + __set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap); + __set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap2); + } + + test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_nth_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_first_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); + test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN); + + /* + * Everything is OK. Return error just to let user run benchmark + * again without annoying rmmod. + */ + return -EINVAL; +} +module_init(find_bit_test); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test for find_*_bit functions"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); |
