summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>2026-09-02 09:55:01 -0400
committerSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>2026-09-02 11:08:21 -0400
commit4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5 (patch)
tree350aa83b47da0b574a814795392b20b0bed83cbc /lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
downloadlinux-stable-4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5.tar.gz
linux-stable-4617721c502b2ddaa4e324e86da4997edf738fa5.zip
ftrace: Synchronize the initialization of ftrace_opsgrafted
There's some internal state that ftrace_ops needs to have set, but since it can be declared outside of the ftrace.c code, it calls ftrace_ops_init() on the ops in every global function. The issue is that if two tasks call it on the same ops at the same time it is possible to have the initialization of one corrupt the initialization of the other call. Create a ops_mutex to use to synchronize every initialization of the ftrace_ops. The mutex is taken within checking the ftrace_ops flag that states it was initializied but the flag is checked again after the mutex has been taken. Checking first outside the mutex allows it to shortcut having to take the mutex. But then the check needs to be done again after the mute is taken in case of races. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260902095501.6b59af20@gandalf.local.home Fixes: f04f24fb7e48d ("ftrace, kprobes: Fix a deadlock on ftrace_regex_lock") Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Close: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260829025528.49A831F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/find_bit_benchmark.c')
-rw-r--r--lib/find_bit_benchmark.c218
1 files changed, 218 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..05305e655
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/find_bit_benchmark.c
@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Test for find_*_bit functions.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2017 Cavium.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * find_bit functions are widely used in kernel, so the successful boot
+ * is good enough test for correctness.
+ *
+ * This test is focused on performance of traversing bitmaps. Two typical
+ * scenarios are reproduced:
+ * - randomly filled bitmap with approximately equal number of set and
+ * cleared bits;
+ * - sparse bitmap with few set bits at random positions.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/printk.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
+
+#define BITMAP_LEN (4096UL * 8 * 10)
+#define SPARSE 500
+
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
+
+/*
+ * This is Schlemiel the Painter's algorithm.
+ */
+static int __init test_find_first_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) {
+ i = find_first_bit(cp, len);
+ __clear_bit(i, cp);
+ }
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_first_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_first_and_bit(const void *bitmap, const void *bitmap2,
+ unsigned long len)
+{
+ static DECLARE_BITMAP(cp, BITMAP_LEN) __initdata;
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ bitmap_copy(cp, bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < len; cnt++) {
+ i = find_first_and_bit(cp, bitmap2, len);
+ __clear_bit(i, cp);
+ }
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_first_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_next_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
+ i = find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, i) + 1;
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_next_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_next_zero_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
+ i = find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, len, i) + 1;
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_next_zero_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_last_bit(const void *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long l, cnt = 0;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ do {
+ cnt++;
+ l = find_last_bit(bitmap, len);
+ if (l >= len)
+ break;
+ len = l;
+ } while (len);
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_last_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_nth_bit(const unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long l, n, w = bitmap_weight(bitmap, len);
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (n = 0; n < w; n++) {
+ l = find_nth_bit(bitmap, len, n);
+ WARN_ON(l >= len);
+ }
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_nth_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, w);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init test_find_next_and_bit(const void *bitmap,
+ const void *bitmap2, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
+ i = find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN, i + 1);
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("find_next_and_bit: %18llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init
+test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(unsigned long *bitmap, unsigned long len)
+{
+ unsigned long i, cnt;
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ time = ktime_get();
+ for (cnt = i = 0; i < BITMAP_LEN; cnt++)
+ i = bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN, i, 8, 0, 0) + 1;
+ time = ktime_get() - time;
+ pr_err("bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off:%7llu ns, %6ld iterations\n", time, cnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init find_bit_test(void)
+{
+ unsigned long nbits = BITMAP_LEN / SPARSE;
+
+ pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with random-filled bitmap\n");
+
+ get_random_bytes(bitmap, sizeof(bitmap));
+ get_random_bytes(bitmap2, sizeof(bitmap2));
+
+ test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_nth_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10);
+
+ /*
+ * test_find_first_bit() may take some time, so
+ * traverse only part of bitmap to avoid soft lockup.
+ */
+ test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN / 10);
+ test_find_first_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN / 2);
+ test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ pr_err("\nStart testing find_bit() with sparse bitmap\n");
+
+ bitmap_zero(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ bitmap_zero(bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ while (nbits--) {
+ __set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap);
+ __set_bit(get_random_u32_below(BITMAP_LEN), bitmap2);
+ }
+
+ test_bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_next_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_last_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_nth_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_first_bit(bitmap, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_first_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN);
+ test_find_next_and_bit(bitmap, bitmap2, BITMAP_LEN);
+
+ /*
+ * Everything is OK. Return error just to let user run benchmark
+ * again without annoying rmmod.
+ */
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+module_init(find_bit_test);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test for find_*_bit functions");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");