diff options
| author | Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com> | 2026-09-08 15:37:42 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2026-09-17 09:48:42 +0200 |
| commit | a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255 (patch) | |
| tree | 73fef824f9a846cf935869d0dbc5070ef6e2f741 /lib/dhry_2.c | |
| download | linux-stable-a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255.tar.gz linux-stable-a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255.zip | |
x86/kprobes: Fix crash when probing CS CALL instructionsgrafted
When using eBPF to probe CS CALL instructions within a function,
a crash can be triggered.
The eBPF tool probes offset 257 of the __hrtimer_run_queues()
function:
<__hrtimer_run_queues+249>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
<__hrtimer_run_queues+254>: mov %r14,%rdi
<__hrtimer_run_queues+257>: cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12>
<__hrtimer_run_queues+263>: mov %eax,%r12d
<__hrtimer_run_queues+266>: xchg %ax,%ax
<__hrtimer_run_queues+268>: mov %r13,%rdi
Which triggers this crash:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P
RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230
Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is
at the 6th byte of the above CS CALL instruction. Since the CS CALL
instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that
call instruction.
The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a
function, a kprobe with INT3 is used as the underlying implementation.
During single-step emulation of the original CALL instruction,
int3_emulate_call() assumes that the probed CALL instruction is 5 bytes
long. However, the actual CS-prefixed CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes,
so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU
returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at
the address of the last byte of that CS CALL instruction. Coincidentally,
starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely
different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash.
Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from
the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return
address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro.
[ mingo: Refined the changelog ]
Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step")
Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260908073742.GA10517@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/dhry_2.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/dhry_2.c | 175 |
1 files changed, 175 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/dhry_2.c b/lib/dhry_2.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c19e661f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/dhry_2.c @@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) +/* + **************************************************************************** + * + * "DHRYSTONE" Benchmark Program + * ----------------------------- + * + * Version: C, Version 2.1 + * + * File: dhry_2.c (part 3 of 3) + * + * Date: May 25, 1988 + * + * Author: Reinhold P. Weicker + * + **************************************************************************** + */ + +#include "dhry.h" + +#include <linux/string.h> + + +static Boolean Func_3(Enumeration Enum_Par_Val) +/***************************/ +/* executed once */ +/* Enum_Par_Val == Ident_3 */ +{ + Enumeration Enum_Loc; + + Enum_Loc = Enum_Par_Val; + if (Enum_Loc == Ident_3) { + /* then, executed */ + return true; + } else { + /* not executed */ + return false; + } +} /* Func_3 */ + + +void Proc_6(Enumeration Enum_Val_Par, Enumeration *Enum_Ref_Par) +/*********************************/ +/* executed once */ +/* Enum_Val_Par == Ident_3, Enum_Ref_Par becomes Ident_2 */ +{ + *Enum_Ref_Par = Enum_Val_Par; + if (!Func_3(Enum_Val_Par)) { + /* then, not executed */ + *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_4; + } + switch (Enum_Val_Par) { + case Ident_1: + *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_1; + break; + case Ident_2: + if (Int_Glob > 100) { + /* then */ + *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_1; + } else { + *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_4; + } + break; + case Ident_3: /* executed */ + *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_2; + break; + case Ident_4: + break; + case Ident_5: + *Enum_Ref_Par = Ident_3; + break; + } /* switch */ +} /* Proc_6 */ + + +void Proc_7(One_Fifty Int_1_Par_Val, One_Fifty Int_2_Par_Val, One_Fifty *Int_Par_Ref) +/**********************************************/ +/* executed three times */ +/* first call: Int_1_Par_Val == 2, Int_2_Par_Val == 3, */ +/* Int_Par_Ref becomes 7 */ +/* second call: Int_1_Par_Val == 10, Int_2_Par_Val == 5, */ +/* Int_Par_Ref becomes 17 */ +/* third call: Int_1_Par_Val == 6, Int_2_Par_Val == 10, */ +/* Int_Par_Ref becomes 18 */ +{ + One_Fifty Int_Loc; + + Int_Loc = Int_1_Par_Val + 2; + *Int_Par_Ref = Int_2_Par_Val + Int_Loc; +} /* Proc_7 */ + + +void Proc_8(Arr_1_Dim Arr_1_Par_Ref, Arr_2_Dim Arr_2_Par_Ref, int Int_1_Par_Val, int Int_2_Par_Val) +/*********************************************************************/ +/* executed once */ +/* Int_Par_Val_1 == 3 */ +/* Int_Par_Val_2 == 7 */ +{ + One_Fifty Int_Index; + One_Fifty Int_Loc; + + Int_Loc = Int_1_Par_Val + 5; + Arr_1_Par_Ref[Int_Loc] = Int_2_Par_Val; + Arr_1_Par_Ref[Int_Loc+1] = Arr_1_Par_Ref[Int_Loc]; + Arr_1_Par_Ref[Int_Loc+30] = Int_Loc; + for (Int_Index = Int_Loc; Int_Index <= Int_Loc+1; ++Int_Index) + Arr_2_Par_Ref[Int_Loc][Int_Index] = Int_Loc; + Arr_2_Par_Ref[Int_Loc][Int_Loc-1] += 1; + Arr_2_Par_Ref[Int_Loc+20][Int_Loc] = Arr_1_Par_Ref[Int_Loc]; + Int_Glob = 5; +} /* Proc_8 */ + + +Enumeration Func_1(Capital_Letter Ch_1_Par_Val, Capital_Letter Ch_2_Par_Val) +/*************************************************/ +/* executed three times */ +/* first call: Ch_1_Par_Val == 'H', Ch_2_Par_Val == 'R' */ +/* second call: Ch_1_Par_Val == 'A', Ch_2_Par_Val == 'C' */ +/* third call: Ch_1_Par_Val == 'B', Ch_2_Par_Val == 'C' */ +{ + Capital_Letter Ch_1_Loc; + Capital_Letter Ch_2_Loc; + + Ch_1_Loc = Ch_1_Par_Val; + Ch_2_Loc = Ch_1_Loc; + if (Ch_2_Loc != Ch_2_Par_Val) { + /* then, executed */ + return Ident_1; + } else { + /* not executed */ + Ch_1_Glob = Ch_1_Loc; + return Ident_2; + } +} /* Func_1 */ + + +Boolean Func_2(Str_30 Str_1_Par_Ref, Str_30 Str_2_Par_Ref) +/*************************************************/ +/* executed once */ +/* Str_1_Par_Ref == "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 1'ST STRING" */ +/* Str_2_Par_Ref == "DHRYSTONE PROGRAM, 2'ND STRING" */ +{ + One_Thirty Int_Loc; + Capital_Letter Ch_Loc; + + Int_Loc = 2; + while (Int_Loc <= 2) { + /* loop body executed once */ + if (Func_1(Str_1_Par_Ref[Int_Loc], + Str_2_Par_Ref[Int_Loc+1]) == Ident_1) { + /* then, executed */ + Ch_Loc = 'A'; + Int_Loc += 1; + } + } /* if, while */ + if (Ch_Loc >= 'W' && Ch_Loc < 'Z') { + /* then, not executed */ + Int_Loc = 7; + } + if (Ch_Loc == 'R') { + /* then, not executed */ + return true; + } else { + /* executed */ + if (strcmp(Str_1_Par_Ref, Str_2_Par_Ref) > 0) { + /* then, not executed */ + Int_Loc += 7; + Int_Glob = Int_Loc; + return true; + } else { + /* executed */ + return false; + } + } /* if Ch_Loc */ +} /* Func_2 */ |
