summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/kunit/try-catch.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>2026-08-31 10:58:09 +0300
committerMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>2026-09-02 09:07:46 +0200
commit4310c6b8e75d6a47f7548e5948fbe6318aa4440a (patch)
tree0032b584d8e218681a48126eb91f57091c351b83 /include/kunit/try-catch.h
downloadlinux-stable-4310c6b8e75d6a47f7548e5948fbe6318aa4440a.tar.gz
linux-stable-4310c6b8e75d6a47f7548e5948fbe6318aa4440a.zip
thunderbolt: Fix NULL dereference in tb_remove_work()grafted
There is a slight race between tb_remove_work() and tb_domain_remove() which leads to dereferencing a NULL tb->root_switch pointer inside tb_free_unplugged_xdomains(): Thread A Thread B tb_remove_work() tb_domain_remove() mutex_lock(&tb->lock) tb_stop() /* doesn't cancel a running callback */ cancel_delayed_work(&tcm->remove_work) ... tb_switch_remove(tb->root_switch) tb->root_switch = NULL mutex_unlock(&tb->lock) mutex_lock(&tb->lock) ... /* without checking ->root_switch */ tb_free_unplugged_xdomains(tb->root_switch) mutex_unlock(&tb->lock) Commit a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without holding tb->lock") doesn't seem right to move tb_free_unplugged_xdomains() out of the &tb->lock section and the check for tb->root_switch, in particular. It states: For this reason separate removing the XDomain from the topology data structures (where we need the lock) from unregistering the device from the bus (where remove callbacks of the drivers are being called). tb_free_unplugged_xdomains() belongs to the former group of functions requiring the lock. And it also calls tb_xdomain_remove() which should only be called with &tb->lock held. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static analysis tool. Fixes: a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without holding tb->lock") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/kunit/try-catch.h')
-rw-r--r--include/kunit/try-catch.h63
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/kunit/try-catch.h b/include/kunit/try-catch.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d4e1a5b98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/kunit/try-catch.h
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * An API to allow a function, that may fail, to be executed, and recover in a
+ * controlled manner.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC.
+ * Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
+ */
+
+#ifndef _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H
+#define _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+typedef void (*kunit_try_catch_func_t)(void *);
+
+struct kunit;
+
+/**
+ * struct kunit_try_catch - provides a generic way to run code which might fail.
+ * @test: The test case that is currently being executed.
+ * @try_result: Contains any errno obtained while running test case.
+ * @try: The function, the test case, to attempt to run.
+ * @catch: The function called if @try bails out.
+ * @context: used to pass user data to the try and catch functions.
+ *
+ * kunit_try_catch provides a generic, architecture independent way to execute
+ * an arbitrary function of type kunit_try_catch_func_t which may bail out by
+ * calling kunit_try_catch_throw(). If kunit_try_catch_throw() is called, @try
+ * is stopped at the site of invocation and @catch is called.
+ *
+ * struct kunit_try_catch provides a generic interface for the functionality
+ * needed to implement kunit->abort() which in turn is needed for implementing
+ * assertions. Assertions allow stating a precondition for a test simplifying
+ * how test cases are written and presented.
+ *
+ * Assertions are like expectations, except they abort (call
+ * kunit_try_catch_throw()) when the specified condition is not met. This is
+ * useful when you look at a test case as a logical statement about some piece
+ * of code, where assertions are the premises for the test case, and the
+ * conclusion is a set of predicates, rather expectations, that must all be
+ * true. If your premises are violated, it does not makes sense to continue.
+ */
+struct kunit_try_catch {
+ /* private: internal use only. */
+ struct kunit *test;
+ int try_result;
+ kunit_try_catch_func_t try;
+ kunit_try_catch_func_t catch;
+ unsigned long timeout;
+ void *context;
+};
+
+void kunit_try_catch_run(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch, void *context);
+
+void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch);
+
+static inline int kunit_try_catch_get_result(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch)
+{
+ return try_catch->try_result;
+}
+
+#endif /* _KUNIT_TRY_CATCH_H */