x86/kprobes: Fix crash when probing CS CALL instructionsgrafted

When using eBPF to probe CS CALL instructions within a function,
a crash can be triggered.

The eBPF tool probes offset 257 of the __hrtimer_run_queues()
function:

<__hrtimer_run_queues+249>:  nopl   0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
<__hrtimer_run_queues+254>:  mov    %r14,%rdi
<__hrtimer_run_queues+257>:  cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12>
<__hrtimer_run_queues+263>:  mov    %eax,%r12d
<__hrtimer_run_queues+266>:  xchg   %ax,%ax
<__hrtimer_run_queues+268>:  mov    %r13,%rdi

Which triggers this crash:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9
  #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
  #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
  PGD 0 P4D 0
  Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P
  RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230

Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is
at the 6th byte of the above CS CALL instruction. Since the CS CALL
instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that
call instruction.

The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a
function, a kprobe with INT3 is used as the underlying implementation.

During single-step emulation of the original CALL instruction,
int3_emulate_call() assumes that the probed CALL instruction is 5 bytes
long. However, the actual CS-prefixed CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes,
so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU
returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at
the address of the last byte of that CS CALL instruction. Coincidentally,
starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely
different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash.

Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from
the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return
address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro.

[ mingo: Refined the changelog ]

Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step")
Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260908073742.GA10517@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000

1 files changed, 51 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/drm/intel/pick.h b/include/drm/intel/pick.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d976fab8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/drm/intel/pick.h
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
+/* Copyright © 2026 Intel Corporation */
+
+#ifndef _PICK_H_
+#define _PICK_H_
+
+/*
+ * Given the first two numbers __a and __b of arbitrarily many evenly spaced
+ * numbers, pick the 0-based __index'th value.
+ *
+ * Always prefer this over _PICK() if the numbers are evenly spaced.
+ */
+#define _PICK_EVEN(__index, __a, __b) ((__a) + (__index) * ((__b) - (__a)))
+
+/*
+ * Like _PICK_EVEN(), but supports 2 ranges of evenly spaced address offsets.
+ * @__c_index corresponds to the index in which the second range starts to be
+ * used. Using math interval notation, the first range is used for indexes [ 0,
+ * @__c_index), while the second range is used for [ @__c_index, ... ). Example:
+ *
+ * #define _FOO_A			0xf000
+ * #define _FOO_B			0xf004
+ * #define _FOO_C			0xf008
+ * #define _SUPER_FOO_A			0xa000
+ * #define _SUPER_FOO_B			0xa100
+ * #define FOO(x)			_MMIO(_PICK_EVEN_2RANGES(x, 3,		\
+ *					      _FOO_A, _FOO_B,			\
+ *					      _SUPER_FOO_A, _SUPER_FOO_B))
+ *
+ * This expands to:
+ *	0: 0xf000,
+ *	1: 0xf004,
+ *	2: 0xf008,
+ *	3: 0xa000,
+ *	4: 0xa100,
+ *	5: 0xa200,
+ *	...
+ */
+#define _PICK_EVEN_2RANGES(__index, __c_index, __a, __b, __c, __d)		\
+	(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(!__is_constexpr(__c_index)) +			\
+	 ((__index) < (__c_index) ? _PICK_EVEN(__index, __a, __b) :		\
+				   _PICK_EVEN((__index) - (__c_index), __c, __d)))
+
+/*
+ * Given the arbitrary numbers in varargs, pick the 0-based __index'th number.
+ *
+ * Always prefer _PICK_EVEN() over this if the numbers are evenly spaced.
+ */
+#define _PICK(__index, ...) (((const u32 []){ __VA_ARGS__ })[__index])
+
+#endif