ARM: 9480/1: entry: expand comment in __switch_tografted

As per discussion between the developers in the mail thread
linked, expand the comment in __switch_to so that readers
of the code understand what is going on.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/crypto/internal/simd.h b/include/crypto/internal/simd.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f5e5d7b63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/crypto/internal/simd.h
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Shared crypto simd helpers
+ */
+
+#ifndef _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H
+#define _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H
+
+#include <asm/simd.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct simd_aead_alg;
+struct aead_alg;
+
+int simd_register_aeads_compat(struct aead_alg *algs, int count,
+			       struct simd_aead_alg **simd_algs);
+
+void simd_unregister_aeads(struct aead_alg *algs, int count,
+			   struct simd_aead_alg **simd_algs);
+
+/*
+ * crypto_simd_usable() - is it allowed at this time to use SIMD instructions or
+ *			  access the SIMD register file?
+ *
+ * This delegates to may_use_simd(), except that this also returns false if SIMD
+ * in crypto code has been temporarily disabled on this CPU by the crypto
+ * self-tests, in order to test the no-SIMD fallback code.  This override is
+ * currently limited to configurations where the "full" self-tests are enabled,
+ * because it might be a bit too invasive to be part of the "fast" self-tests.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_SELFTESTS_FULL
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(bool, crypto_simd_disabled_for_test);
+#define crypto_simd_usable() \
+	(may_use_simd() && !this_cpu_read(crypto_simd_disabled_for_test))
+#else
+#define crypto_simd_usable() may_use_simd()
+#endif
+
+#endif /* _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H */