thunderbolt: Fix NULL dereference in tb_remove_work()grafted

There is a slight race between tb_remove_work() and tb_domain_remove()
which leads to dereferencing a NULL tb->root_switch pointer inside
tb_free_unplugged_xdomains():

        Thread A                            Thread B

  tb_remove_work()
                                    tb_domain_remove()
                                      mutex_lock(&tb->lock)
                                      tb_stop()
                                        /* doesn't cancel a running callback */
                                        cancel_delayed_work(&tcm->remove_work)
                                        ...
                                        tb_switch_remove(tb->root_switch)
                                        tb->root_switch = NULL
                                      mutex_unlock(&tb->lock)
    mutex_lock(&tb->lock)
    ...
    /* without checking ->root_switch */
    tb_free_unplugged_xdomains(tb->root_switch)
    mutex_unlock(&tb->lock)

Commit a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without
holding tb->lock") doesn't seem right to move tb_free_unplugged_xdomains()
out of the &tb->lock section and the check for tb->root_switch, in
particular.  It states:

  For this reason separate removing the XDomain from the topology data
  structures (where we need the lock) from unregistering the device from
  the bus (where remove callbacks of the drivers are being called).

tb_free_unplugged_xdomains() belongs to the former group of functions
requiring the lock.  And it also calls tb_xdomain_remove() which should
only be called with &tb->lock held.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static
analysis tool.

Fixes: a8937f35cf39 ("thunderbolt: Remove XDomain from the bus without holding tb->lock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

1 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/crypto/internal/simd.h b/include/crypto/internal/simd.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f5e5d7b63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/crypto/internal/simd.h
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Shared crypto simd helpers
+ */
+
+#ifndef _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H
+#define _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H
+
+#include <asm/simd.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct simd_aead_alg;
+struct aead_alg;
+
+int simd_register_aeads_compat(struct aead_alg *algs, int count,
+			       struct simd_aead_alg **simd_algs);
+
+void simd_unregister_aeads(struct aead_alg *algs, int count,
+			   struct simd_aead_alg **simd_algs);
+
+/*
+ * crypto_simd_usable() - is it allowed at this time to use SIMD instructions or
+ *			  access the SIMD register file?
+ *
+ * This delegates to may_use_simd(), except that this also returns false if SIMD
+ * in crypto code has been temporarily disabled on this CPU by the crypto
+ * self-tests, in order to test the no-SIMD fallback code.  This override is
+ * currently limited to configurations where the "full" self-tests are enabled,
+ * because it might be a bit too invasive to be part of the "fast" self-tests.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_SELFTESTS_FULL
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(bool, crypto_simd_disabled_for_test);
+#define crypto_simd_usable() \
+	(may_use_simd() && !this_cpu_read(crypto_simd_disabled_for_test))
+#else
+#define crypto_simd_usable() may_use_simd()
+#endif
+
+#endif /* _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H */