sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain, to fix LLC mis-scheduling buggrafted

alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active
load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the
source rq prefers its LLC:

	env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable

But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated
in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued,
so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/
clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks.

So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted
in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks,
alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task
off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this
is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB
skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one
we want.

Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in
nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC
(pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership
once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through
pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that
change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(),
set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same
predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting
or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering.

nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued
semantics.

Fixes: 714059f79ff0 ("sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/
Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # v7.2.x
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06af61afedac32e6477f57feb4d658f6c411c3af.1790035273.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com

1 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/crypto/internal/simd.h b/include/crypto/internal/simd.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f5e5d7b63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/crypto/internal/simd.h
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Shared crypto simd helpers
+ */
+
+#ifndef _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H
+#define _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H
+
+#include <asm/simd.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct simd_aead_alg;
+struct aead_alg;
+
+int simd_register_aeads_compat(struct aead_alg *algs, int count,
+			       struct simd_aead_alg **simd_algs);
+
+void simd_unregister_aeads(struct aead_alg *algs, int count,
+			   struct simd_aead_alg **simd_algs);
+
+/*
+ * crypto_simd_usable() - is it allowed at this time to use SIMD instructions or
+ *			  access the SIMD register file?
+ *
+ * This delegates to may_use_simd(), except that this also returns false if SIMD
+ * in crypto code has been temporarily disabled on this CPU by the crypto
+ * self-tests, in order to test the no-SIMD fallback code.  This override is
+ * currently limited to configurations where the "full" self-tests are enabled,
+ * because it might be a bit too invasive to be part of the "fast" self-tests.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_SELFTESTS_FULL
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(bool, crypto_simd_disabled_for_test);
+#define crypto_simd_usable() \
+	(may_use_simd() && !this_cpu_read(crypto_simd_disabled_for_test))
+#else
+#define crypto_simd_usable() may_use_simd()
+#endif
+
+#endif /* _CRYPTO_INTERNAL_SIMD_H */