kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted

Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:

    vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
    can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd

The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.

This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.

Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.

Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 64 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/romfs/Kconfig b/fs/romfs/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f24a96a33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/romfs/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+config ROMFS_FS
+	tristate "ROM file system support"
+	depends on BLOCK || MTD
+	help
+	  This is a very small read-only file system mainly intended for
+	  initial ram disks of installation disks, but it could be used for
+	  other read-only media as well.  Read
+	  <file:Documentation/filesystems/romfs.rst> for details.
+
+	  To compile this file system support as a module, choose M here: the
+	  module will be called romfs.  Note that the file system of your
+	  root partition (the one containing the directory /) cannot be a
+	  module.
+
+	  If you don't know whether you need it, then you don't need it:
+	  answer N.
+
+#
+# Select the backing stores to be supported
+#
+choice
+	prompt "RomFS backing stores"
+	depends on ROMFS_FS
+	default ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BLOCK
+	help
+	  Select the backing stores to be supported.
+
+config ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BLOCK
+	bool "Block device-backed ROM file system support"
+	depends on BLOCK
+	help
+	  This permits ROMFS to use block devices buffered through the page
+	  cache as the medium from which to retrieve data.  It does not allow
+	  direct mapping of the medium.
+
+	  If unsure, answer Y.
+
+config ROMFS_BACKED_BY_MTD
+	bool "MTD-backed ROM file system support"
+	depends on MTD=y || (ROMFS_FS=m && MTD)
+	help
+	  This permits ROMFS to use MTD based devices directly, without the
+	  intercession of the block layer (which may have been disabled).  It
+	  also allows direct mapping of MTD devices through romfs files under
+	  NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly addressable by
+	  the CPU.
+
+	  If unsure, answer Y.
+
+config ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BOTH
+	bool "Both the above"
+	depends on BLOCK && (MTD=y || (ROMFS_FS=m && MTD))
+endchoice
+
+
+config ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
+	bool
+	default y if ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BLOCK || ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BOTH
+	select BUFFER_HEAD
+
+config ROMFS_ON_MTD
+	bool
+	default y if ROMFS_BACKED_BY_MTD || ROMFS_BACKED_BY_BOTH