dmaengine: fix use-after-free in dma_chan_put() and dma_release_channel()grafted

When dma_device_put() drops the last reference on chan->device->ref,
dma_device_release() runs and may free the dma_device along with its
channels.

dma_chan_put() then still reads chan->device->owner via
dma_chan_to_owner() for the trailing module_put(). KASAN catches it:

	slab-use-after-free in dma_chan_put+0x3e6/0x4c0
	Read of size 8 by task insmod/6319
	Freed by task 6319:
	  kfree+0x225/0x470
	  dma_chan_put+0x395/0x4c0
	  dmaengine_put+0xf8/0x160

Cache the module owner in dma_chan_put() before the put so the trailing
module_put() does not need chan->device.

Fixes: 8ad342a86359 ("dmaengine: Add reference counting to dma_device struct")
Suggested-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260518-dmaengine-kref-fix-v1-1-4d6125048fb7@amd.com
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260822-dmaengine-kref-fix-v5-3-d4a4ee47d927@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/proc/interrupts.c b/fs/proc/interrupts.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..714a22ded
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/proc/interrupts.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irqnr.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+
+/*
+ * /proc/interrupts
+ */
+static void *int_seq_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	return *pos <= irq_get_nr_irqs() ? pos : NULL;
+}
+
+static void *int_seq_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	(*pos)++;
+	if (*pos > irq_get_nr_irqs())
+		return NULL;
+	return pos;
+}
+
+static void int_seq_stop(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
+{
+	/* Nothing to do */
+}
+
+static const struct seq_operations int_seq_ops = {
+	.start = int_seq_start,
+	.next  = int_seq_next,
+	.stop  = int_seq_stop,
+	.show  = show_interrupts
+};
+
+static int __init proc_interrupts_init(void)
+{
+	proc_create_seq("interrupts", 0, NULL, &int_seq_ops);
+	return 0;
+}
+fs_initcall(proc_interrupts_init);