ARM: 9480/1: entry: expand comment in __switch_tografted

As per discussion between the developers in the mail thread
linked, expand the comment in __switch_to so that readers
of the code understand what is going on.

Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/proc/interrupts.c b/fs/proc/interrupts.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..714a22ded
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/proc/interrupts.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irqnr.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+
+/*
+ * /proc/interrupts
+ */
+static void *int_seq_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	return *pos <= irq_get_nr_irqs() ? pos : NULL;
+}
+
+static void *int_seq_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	(*pos)++;
+	if (*pos > irq_get_nr_irqs())
+		return NULL;
+	return pos;
+}
+
+static void int_seq_stop(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
+{
+	/* Nothing to do */
+}
+
+static const struct seq_operations int_seq_ops = {
+	.start = int_seq_start,
+	.next  = int_seq_next,
+	.stop  = int_seq_stop,
+	.show  = show_interrupts
+};
+
+static int __init proc_interrupts_init(void)
+{
+	proc_create_seq("interrupts", 0, NULL, &int_seq_ops);
+	return 0;
+}
+fs_initcall(proc_interrupts_init);