ARM: 9485/1: mm: acquire mmap write lock around show_pte() for user faultsgrafted

When CONFIG_DEBUG_USER=y, and cmdline "user_debug=31" is set,
a user fault may trigger show_pte() without any lock.
If another thread in the same process concurrently calls munmap(),
the page table pages may be freed while show_pte() is still traversing
them, causing a use-after-free in show_pte().

If CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y, this may cause a kernel panic if the pages table
of PMD are freed when show_pte() is running.

Acquire mmap_write_lock() around show_pte() for user faults to fix the
contention.

For user faults, additionally restrict that show_pte() is called only
when the addr is a user-space address (addr < TASK_SIZE). This is because
the lock of tsk->mm only protects the virtual memory of user address space,
furthermore, dumping the page tables of a kernel-space address for user
faults is unnecessary and may have security implications.

Keep everything unchanged for kernel faults, because the kernel is
already in the "oops" state, acquiring a lock may risk a deadlock.

Co-developed-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>

Fixes: 6d021b724481 ("ARM: dump pgd, pmd and pte states on unhandled data abort faults")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260716014022.2823-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
Acked-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Qi Xi <xiqi2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/proc/interrupts.c b/fs/proc/interrupts.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..714a22ded
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/proc/interrupts.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irqnr.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+
+/*
+ * /proc/interrupts
+ */
+static void *int_seq_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	return *pos <= irq_get_nr_irqs() ? pos : NULL;
+}
+
+static void *int_seq_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	(*pos)++;
+	if (*pos > irq_get_nr_irqs())
+		return NULL;
+	return pos;
+}
+
+static void int_seq_stop(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
+{
+	/* Nothing to do */
+}
+
+static const struct seq_operations int_seq_ops = {
+	.start = int_seq_start,
+	.next  = int_seq_next,
+	.stop  = int_seq_stop,
+	.show  = show_interrupts
+};
+
+static int __init proc_interrupts_init(void)
+{
+	proc_create_seq("interrupts", 0, NULL, &int_seq_ops);
+	return 0;
+}
+fs_initcall(proc_interrupts_init);