diff options
| author | Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> | 2026-09-04 10:43:19 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2026-09-04 07:58:36 -0700 |
| commit | 6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722 (patch) | |
| tree | 58e8288fead484f6755ad0815fc74c3742663761 /fs/coda/Kconfig | |
| download | linux-stable-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.tar.gz linux-stable-6668ed271eaefaa63e686bdfbedaeb7b8e492722.zip | |
selftests/bpf: Reject graph kptr use after RCU unlockgrafted
Add a sleepable verifier test that loads a graph-node local kptr in an
explicit RCU read-side critical section, then passes its node to
bpf_rbtree_remove() after the section ends.
Before the verifier fix, the stale NON_OWN_REF flag makes the node look like
a live borrowed reference and the program is accepted. After the fix, the
pointer is demoted without NON_OWN_REF and the graph kfunc argument is
rejected.
Also exercise a graph kptr loaded while a spin lock provides implicit RCU
protection. The pointer must be invalidated when the lock is released, which
guards the required ordering between non-owning-reference invalidation and
RCU demotion.
Update the existing fault-protected load test state description. The
post-unlock pointer no longer carries NON_OWN_REF, but remains readable
because the load is rewritten to use BPF_PROBE_MEM.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904084325.52250-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/coda/Kconfig')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/coda/Kconfig | 22 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/coda/Kconfig b/fs/coda/Kconfig new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c3477eeaf --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/coda/Kconfig @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +config CODA_FS + tristate "Coda file system support (advanced network fs)" + depends on INET + help + Coda is an advanced network file system, similar to NFS in that it + enables you to mount file systems of a remote server and access them + with regular Unix commands as if they were sitting on your hard + disk. Coda has several advantages over NFS: support for + disconnected operation (e.g. for laptops), read/write server + replication, security model for authentication and encryption, + persistent client caches and write back caching. + + If you say Y here, your Linux box will be able to act as a Coda + *client*. You will need user level code as well, both for the + client and server. Servers are currently user level, i.e. they need + no kernel support. Please read + <file:Documentation/filesystems/coda.rst> and check out the Coda + home page <http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/>. + + To compile the coda client support as a module, choose M here: the + module will be called coda. |