kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted

Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:

    vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
    can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd

The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.

This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.

Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.

Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 223 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-buffer-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-buffer-tests.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6a43a64ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/extent-buffer-tests.c
@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Fusion IO.  All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include "btrfs-tests.h"
+#include "../ctree.h"
+#include "../extent_io.h"
+#include "../disk-io.h"
+#include "../accessors.h"
+
+static int test_btrfs_split_item(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
+{
+	struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
+	struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
+	struct btrfs_root *root = NULL;
+	struct extent_buffer *eb;
+	char *value = "mary had a little lamb";
+	char *split1 = "mary had a little";
+	char *split2 = " lamb";
+	char *split3 = "mary";
+	char *split4 = " had a little";
+	char buf[32];
+	struct btrfs_key key;
+	u32 value_len = strlen(value);
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	test_msg("running btrfs_split_item tests");
+
+	fs_info = btrfs_alloc_dummy_fs_info(nodesize, sectorsize);
+	if (!fs_info) {
+		test_std_err(TEST_ALLOC_FS_INFO);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	root = btrfs_alloc_dummy_root(fs_info);
+	if (IS_ERR(root)) {
+		test_std_err(TEST_ALLOC_ROOT);
+		ret = PTR_ERR(root);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
+	if (!path) {
+		test_std_err(TEST_ALLOC_PATH);
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	eb = alloc_dummy_extent_buffer(fs_info, nodesize);
+	path->nodes[0] = eb;
+	if (!eb) {
+		test_std_err(TEST_ALLOC_EXTENT_BUFFER);
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+	path->slots[0] = 0;
+
+	key.objectid = 0;
+	key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY;
+	key.offset = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Passing a NULL trans handle is fine here, we have a dummy root eb
+	 * and the tree is a single node (level 0).
+	 */
+	btrfs_setup_item_for_insert(NULL, root, path, &key, value_len);
+	write_extent_buffer(eb, value, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, 0),
+			    value_len);
+
+	key.offset = 3;
+
+	/*
+	 * Passing NULL trans here should be safe because we have plenty of
+	 * space in this leaf to split the item without having to split the
+	 * leaf.
+	 */
+	ret = btrfs_split_item(NULL, root, path, &key, 17);
+	if (ret) {
+		test_err("split item failed %d", ret);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Read the first slot, it should have the original key and contain only
+	 * 'mary had a little'
+	 */
+	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, 0);
+	if (key.objectid != 0 || key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY ||
+	    key.offset != 0) {
+		test_err("invalid key at slot 0");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (btrfs_item_size(eb, 0) != strlen(split1)) {
+		test_err("invalid len in the first split");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	read_extent_buffer(eb, buf, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, 0),
+			   strlen(split1));
+	if (memcmp(buf, split1, strlen(split1))) {
+		test_err(
+"data in the buffer doesn't match what it should in the first split have='%.*s' want '%s'",
+			 (int)strlen(split1), buf, split1);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, 1);
+	if (key.objectid != 0 || key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY ||
+	    key.offset != 3) {
+		test_err("invalid key at slot 1");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (btrfs_item_size(eb, 1) != strlen(split2)) {
+		test_err("invalid len in the second split");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	read_extent_buffer(eb, buf, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, 1),
+			   strlen(split2));
+	if (memcmp(buf, split2, strlen(split2))) {
+		test_err(
+	"data in the buffer doesn't match what it should in the second split");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	key.offset = 1;
+	/* Do it again so we test memmoving the other items in the leaf */
+	ret = btrfs_split_item(NULL, root, path, &key, 4);
+	if (ret) {
+		test_err("second split item failed %d", ret);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, 0);
+	if (key.objectid != 0 || key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY ||
+	    key.offset != 0) {
+		test_err("invalid key at slot 0");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (btrfs_item_size(eb, 0) != strlen(split3)) {
+		test_err("invalid len in the first split");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	read_extent_buffer(eb, buf, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, 0),
+			   strlen(split3));
+	if (memcmp(buf, split3, strlen(split3))) {
+		test_err(
+	"data in the buffer doesn't match what it should in the third split");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, 1);
+	if (key.objectid != 0 || key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY ||
+	    key.offset != 1) {
+		test_err("invalid key at slot 1");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (btrfs_item_size(eb, 1) != strlen(split4)) {
+		test_err("invalid len in the second split");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	read_extent_buffer(eb, buf, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, 1),
+			   strlen(split4));
+	if (memcmp(buf, split4, strlen(split4))) {
+		test_err(
+	"data in the buffer doesn't match what it should in the fourth split");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(eb, &key, 2);
+	if (key.objectid != 0 || key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY ||
+	    key.offset != 3) {
+		test_err("invalid key at slot 2");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (btrfs_item_size(eb, 2) != strlen(split2)) {
+		test_err("invalid len in the second split");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	read_extent_buffer(eb, buf, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(eb, 2),
+			   strlen(split2));
+	if (memcmp(buf, split2, strlen(split2))) {
+		test_err(
+	"data in the buffer doesn't match what it should in the last chunk");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+out:
+	btrfs_free_path(path);
+	btrfs_free_dummy_root(root);
+	btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(fs_info);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int btrfs_test_extent_buffer_operations(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
+{
+	test_msg("running extent buffer operation tests");
+	return test_btrfs_split_item(sectorsize, nodesize);
+}