summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/btrfs/tests/chunk-allocation-tests.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAli Ahmet Memis <ali@iusegentoo.com>2026-08-21 01:45:27 +0000
committerStafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>2026-08-29 07:32:26 +0100
commit78004e9a87f240df03e2f73120d291763c32e0a7 (patch)
tree137c22dd795222931b9d2bf2501d37cd766741aa /fs/btrfs/tests/chunk-allocation-tests.c
downloadlinux-stable-78004e9a87f240df03e2f73120d291763c32e0a7.tar.gz
linux-stable-78004e9a87f240df03e2f73120d291763c32e0a7.zip
openrisc: fix arbitrary kernel memory access via or1k_atomic syscallgrafted
sys_or1k_atomic() (syscall 244 in the "or1k" ABI) takes two user pointers, v1 and v2, and swaps the words they point to in hand-written assembly. l.lwz r29,0(r4) l.lwz r27,0(r5) l.sw 0(r4),r27 l.sw 0(r5),r29 The pointers are not checked with access_ok(). The four memory accesses also have no exception table entries. A caller passes a kernel address as either pointer, and the syscall reads from and writes to it directly. This gives an unprivileged process a kernel read/write primitive. It overwrites kernel data such as the sys_call_table, gaining code execution in kernel context. Check both pointers before entering the critical section. Add fixups for the four memory accesses so faults on valid but unmapped user addresses return -EFAULT. [shorne@gmail.com: fix comment style] Fixes: 9d02a4283e9c ("OpenRISC: Boot code") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ali Ahmet Memis <ali@iusegentoo.com> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/tests/chunk-allocation-tests.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/tests/chunk-allocation-tests.c476
1 files changed, 476 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/chunk-allocation-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/chunk-allocation-tests.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9beb0602f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/chunk-allocation-tests.c
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2026 Meta. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
+#include "btrfs-tests.h"
+#include "../volumes.h"
+#include "../disk-io.h"
+#include "../extent-io-tree.h"
+
+/*
+ * Tests for chunk allocator pending extent internals.
+ * These two functions form the core of searching the chunk allocation pending
+ * extent bitmap and have relatively easily definable semantics, so unit
+ * testing them can help ensure the correctness of chunk allocation.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Describes the inputs to the system and expected results
+ * when testing btrfs_find_hole_in_pending_extents().
+ */
+struct pending_extent_test_case {
+ const char *name;
+ /* Input range to search. */
+ u64 hole_start;
+ u64 hole_len;
+ /* The size of hole we are searching for. */
+ u64 min_hole_size;
+ /*
+ * Pending extents to set up (up to 2 for up to 3 holes)
+ * If len == 0, then it is skipped.
+ */
+ struct {
+ u64 start;
+ u64 len;
+ } pending_extents[2];
+ /* Expected outputs. */
+ bool expected_found;
+ u64 expected_start;
+ u64 expected_len;
+};
+
+static const struct pending_extent_test_case find_hole_tests[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "no pending extents",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = { },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = 0,
+ .expected_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "pending extent at start of range",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = 0, .len = SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = SZ_1G,
+ .expected_len = 9ULL * SZ_1G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "pending extent overlapping start of range",
+ .hole_start = SZ_1G,
+ .hole_len = 9ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = 0, .len = SZ_2G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = SZ_2G,
+ .expected_len = 8ULL * SZ_1G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "two holes; first hole is exactly big enough",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = 0,
+ .expected_len = SZ_1G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "two holes; first hole is big enough",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_2G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = 0,
+ .expected_len = SZ_2G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "two holes; second hole is big enough",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_2G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = SZ_2G,
+ .expected_len = 8ULL * SZ_1G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "three holes; first hole big enough",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_2G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_2G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ { .start = 4ULL * SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = 0,
+ .expected_len = SZ_2G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "three holes; second hole big enough",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_2G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ { .start = 5ULL * SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = SZ_2G,
+ .expected_len = 3ULL * SZ_1G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "three holes; third hole big enough",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_2G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ { .start = 3ULL * SZ_1G, .len = 5ULL * SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = 8ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .expected_len = SZ_2G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "three holes; all holes too small",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_2G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ { .start = 3ULL * SZ_1G, .len = 6ULL * SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = false,
+ .expected_start = 0,
+ .expected_len = SZ_1G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "three holes; all holes too small; first biggest",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = 3ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_2G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ { .start = 4ULL * SZ_1G, .len = 5ULL * SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = false,
+ .expected_start = 0,
+ .expected_len = SZ_2G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "three holes; all holes too small; second biggest",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = 3ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ { .start = 4ULL * SZ_1G, .len = 5ULL * SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = false,
+ .expected_start = SZ_2G,
+ .expected_len = SZ_2G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "three holes; all holes too small; third biggest",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = 3ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = SZ_1G, .len = SZ_1G },
+ { .start = 3ULL * SZ_1G, .len = 5ULL * SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = false,
+ .expected_start = 8ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .expected_len = SZ_2G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "hole entirely allocated by pending",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = 0, .len = 10ULL * SZ_1G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = false,
+ .expected_start = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .expected_len = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "pending extent at end of range",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = {
+ { .start = 9ULL * SZ_1G, .len = SZ_2G },
+ },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_start = 0,
+ .expected_len = 9ULL * SZ_1G,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "zero length input",
+ .hole_start = SZ_1G,
+ .hole_len = 0,
+ .min_hole_size = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extents = { },
+ .expected_found = false,
+ .expected_start = SZ_1G,
+ .expected_len = 0,
+ },
+};
+
+static int test_find_hole_in_pending(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
+{
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
+ struct btrfs_device *device;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ test_msg("running find_hole_in_pending_extents tests");
+
+ fs_info = btrfs_alloc_dummy_fs_info(nodesize, sectorsize);
+ if (!fs_info) {
+ test_std_err(TEST_ALLOC_FS_INFO);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ device = btrfs_alloc_dummy_device(fs_info);
+ if (IS_ERR(device)) {
+ test_err("failed to allocate dummy device");
+ ret = PTR_ERR(device);
+ goto out_free_fs_info;
+ }
+ device->fs_info = fs_info;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(find_hole_tests); i++) {
+ const struct pending_extent_test_case *test_case = &find_hole_tests[i];
+ u64 hole_start = test_case->hole_start;
+ u64 hole_len = test_case->hole_len;
+ bool found;
+
+ for (int j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(test_case->pending_extents); j++) {
+ u64 start = test_case->pending_extents[j].start;
+ u64 len = test_case->pending_extents[j].len;
+
+ if (!len)
+ continue;
+ btrfs_set_extent_bit(&device->alloc_state,
+ start, start + len - 1,
+ CHUNK_ALLOCATED, NULL);
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+ found = btrfs_find_hole_in_pending_extents(device, &hole_start, &hole_len,
+ test_case->min_hole_size);
+ mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+
+ if (found != test_case->expected_found) {
+ test_err("%s: expected found=%d, got found=%d",
+ test_case->name, test_case->expected_found, found);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_clear_pending_extents;
+ }
+ if (hole_start != test_case->expected_start ||
+ hole_len != test_case->expected_len) {
+ test_err("%s: expected [%llu, %llu), got [%llu, %llu)",
+ test_case->name, test_case->expected_start,
+ test_case->expected_start +
+ test_case->expected_len,
+ hole_start, hole_start + hole_len);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_clear_pending_extents;
+ }
+out_clear_pending_extents:
+ btrfs_clear_extent_bit(&device->alloc_state, 0, (u64)-1,
+ CHUNK_ALLOCATED, NULL);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
+
+out_free_fs_info:
+ btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(fs_info);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Describes the inputs to the system and expected results
+ * when testing btrfs_first_pending_extent().
+ */
+struct first_pending_test_case {
+ const char *name;
+ /* The range to look for a pending extent in. */
+ u64 hole_start;
+ u64 hole_len;
+ /* The pending extent to look for. */
+ struct {
+ u64 start;
+ u64 len;
+ } pending_extent;
+ /* Expected outputs. */
+ bool expected_found;
+ u64 expected_pending_start;
+ u64 expected_pending_end;
+};
+
+static const struct first_pending_test_case first_pending_tests[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "no pending extent",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extent = { 0, 0 },
+ .expected_found = false,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "pending extent at search start",
+ .hole_start = SZ_1G,
+ .hole_len = 9ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extent = { SZ_1G, SZ_1G },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_pending_start = SZ_1G,
+ .expected_pending_end = SZ_2G - 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "pending extent overlapping search start",
+ .hole_start = SZ_1G,
+ .hole_len = 9ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extent = { 0, SZ_2G },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_pending_start = 0,
+ .expected_pending_end = SZ_2G - 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "pending extent inside search range",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = 10ULL * SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extent = { SZ_2G, SZ_1G },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_pending_start = SZ_2G,
+ .expected_pending_end = 3ULL * SZ_1G - 1,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "pending extent outside search range",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = SZ_1G,
+ .pending_extent = { SZ_2G, SZ_1G },
+ .expected_found = false,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "pending extent overlapping end of search range",
+ .hole_start = 0,
+ .hole_len = SZ_2G,
+ .pending_extent = { SZ_1G, SZ_2G },
+ .expected_found = true,
+ .expected_pending_start = SZ_1G,
+ .expected_pending_end = 3ULL * SZ_1G - 1,
+ },
+};
+
+static int test_first_pending_extent(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
+{
+ struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
+ struct btrfs_device *device;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ test_msg("running first_pending_extent tests");
+
+ fs_info = btrfs_alloc_dummy_fs_info(nodesize, sectorsize);
+ if (!fs_info) {
+ test_std_err(TEST_ALLOC_FS_INFO);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ device = btrfs_alloc_dummy_device(fs_info);
+ if (IS_ERR(device)) {
+ test_err("failed to allocate dummy device");
+ ret = PTR_ERR(device);
+ goto out_free_fs_info;
+ }
+
+ device->fs_info = fs_info;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(first_pending_tests); i++) {
+ const struct first_pending_test_case *test_case = &first_pending_tests[i];
+ u64 start = test_case->pending_extent.start;
+ u64 len = test_case->pending_extent.len;
+ u64 pending_start, pending_end;
+ bool found;
+
+ if (len) {
+ btrfs_set_extent_bit(&device->alloc_state,
+ start, start + len - 1,
+ CHUNK_ALLOCATED, NULL);
+ }
+
+ mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+ found = btrfs_first_pending_extent(device, test_case->hole_start,
+ test_case->hole_len,
+ &pending_start, &pending_end);
+ mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+
+ if (found != test_case->expected_found) {
+ test_err("%s: expected found=%d, got found=%d",
+ test_case->name, test_case->expected_found, found);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_clear_pending_extents;
+ }
+ if (!found)
+ goto out_clear_pending_extents;
+
+ if (pending_start != test_case->expected_pending_start ||
+ pending_end != test_case->expected_pending_end) {
+ test_err("%s: expected pending [%llu, %llu], got [%llu, %llu]",
+ test_case->name,
+ test_case->expected_pending_start,
+ test_case->expected_pending_end,
+ pending_start, pending_end);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_clear_pending_extents;
+ }
+
+out_clear_pending_extents:
+ btrfs_clear_extent_bit(&device->alloc_state, 0, (u64)-1,
+ CHUNK_ALLOCATED, NULL);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
+
+out_free_fs_info:
+ btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(fs_info);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int btrfs_test_chunk_allocation(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ test_msg("running chunk allocation tests");
+
+ ret = test_first_pending_extent(sectorsize, nodesize);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = test_find_hole_in_pending(sectorsize, nodesize);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}