selftests/bpf: Reject graph kptr use after RCU unlockgrafted

Add a sleepable verifier test that loads a graph-node local kptr in an
explicit RCU read-side critical section, then passes its node to
bpf_rbtree_remove() after the section ends.

Before the verifier fix, the stale NON_OWN_REF flag makes the node look like
a live borrowed reference and the program is accepted. After the fix, the
pointer is demoted without NON_OWN_REF and the graph kfunc argument is
rejected.

Also exercise a graph kptr loaded while a spin lock provides implicit RCU
protection. The pointer must be invalidated when the lock is released, which
guards the required ordering between non-owning-reference invalidation and
RCU demotion.

Update the existing fault-protected load test state description. The
post-unlock pointer no longer carries NON_OWN_REF, but remains readable
because the load is rewritten to use BPF_PROBE_MEM.

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260904084325.52250-7-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/9p/Kconfig b/fs/9p/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0c63df574
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/9p/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+config 9P_FS
+	tristate "Plan 9 Resource Sharing Support (9P2000)"
+	depends on NET_9P
+	select NETFS_SUPPORT
+	help
+	  If you say Y here, you will get experimental support for
+	  Plan 9 resource sharing via the 9P2000 protocol.
+
+	  See <http://v9fs.sf.net> for more information.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
+if 9P_FS
+config 9P_FSCACHE
+	bool "Enable 9P client caching support"
+	depends on 9P_FS=m && FSCACHE || 9P_FS=y && FSCACHE=y
+	help
+	  Choose Y here to enable persistent, read-only local
+	  caching support for 9p clients using FS-Cache
+
+
+config 9P_FS_POSIX_ACL
+	bool "9P POSIX Access Control Lists"
+	select FS_POSIX_ACL
+	help
+	  POSIX Access Control Lists (ACLs) support permissions for users and
+	  groups beyond the owner/group/world scheme.
+
+	  If you don't know what Access Control Lists are, say N
+
+endif
+
+
+config 9P_FS_SECURITY
+	bool "9P Security Labels"
+	depends on 9P_FS
+	help
+	  Security labels support alternative access control models
+	  implemented by security modules like SELinux.  This option
+	  enables an extended attribute handler for file security
+	  labels in the 9P filesystem.
+
+	  If you are not using a security module that requires using
+	  extended attributes for file security labels, say N.