diff options
| author | Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com> | 2026-09-08 15:37:42 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2026-09-17 09:48:42 +0200 |
| commit | a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255 (patch) | |
| tree | 73fef824f9a846cf935869d0dbc5070ef6e2f741 /drivers/rtc/rtc-max6900.c | |
| download | linux-stable-a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255.tar.gz linux-stable-a5f7a5bb3b7f28ba7e4fa246775b29a0e5537255.zip | |
x86/kprobes: Fix crash when probing CS CALL instructionsgrafted
When using eBPF to probe CS CALL instructions within a function,
a crash can be triggered.
The eBPF tool probes offset 257 of the __hrtimer_run_queues()
function:
<__hrtimer_run_queues+249>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
<__hrtimer_run_queues+254>: mov %r14,%rdi
<__hrtimer_run_queues+257>: cs call <__x86_indirect_thunk_r12>
<__hrtimer_run_queues+263>: mov %eax,%r12d
<__hrtimer_run_queues+266>: xchg %ax,%ax
<__hrtimer_run_queues+268>: mov %r13,%rdi
Which triggers this crash:
BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000f41c9
#PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Kdump: loaded Tainted: P
RIP: 0010:__hrtimer_run_queues+0x106/0x230
Note that __hrtimer_run_queues+0x106 is __hrtimer_run_queues+262, which is
at the 6th byte of the above CS CALL instruction. Since the CS CALL
instruction occupies 6 bytes, the exception occurred in the middle of that
call instruction.
The root cause is that when using eBPF tools to probe in the middle of a
function, a kprobe with INT3 is used as the underlying implementation.
During single-step emulation of the original CALL instruction,
int3_emulate_call() assumes that the probed CALL instruction is 5 bytes
long. However, the actual CS-prefixed CALL instruction occupies 6 bytes,
so it constructs an incorrect exception return address. When the CPU
returns from the kprobe handler, the next instruction to be executed is at
the address of the last byte of that CS CALL instruction. Coincidentally,
starting from that address, the CPU fetches and decodes a completely
different instruction, which ultimately triggers a kernel crash.
Fix the issue by using the actual instruction length obtained from
the instruction decoder when constructing the exception return
address, rather than relying on the hardcoded CALL_INSN_SIZE macro.
[ mingo: Refined the changelog ]
Fixes: 6256e668b7af ("x86/kprobes: Use int3 instead of debug trap for single-step")
Suggested-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260908073742.GA10517@didi-ThinkCentre-M920t-N000
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/rtc/rtc-max6900.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/rtc/rtc-max6900.c | 235 |
1 files changed, 235 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max6900.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max6900.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8ef6d0fcd --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max6900.c @@ -0,0 +1,235 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * rtc class driver for the Maxim MAX6900 chip + * + * Copyright (c) 2007 MontaVista, Software, Inc. + * + * Author: Dale Farnsworth <dale@farnsworth.org> + * + * based on previously existing rtc class drivers + */ + +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/bcd.h> +#include <linux/rtc.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> + +/* + * register indices + */ +#define MAX6900_REG_SC 0 /* seconds 00-59 */ +#define MAX6900_REG_MN 1 /* minutes 00-59 */ +#define MAX6900_REG_HR 2 /* hours 00-23 */ +#define MAX6900_REG_DT 3 /* day of month 00-31 */ +#define MAX6900_REG_MO 4 /* month 01-12 */ +#define MAX6900_REG_DW 5 /* day of week 1-7 */ +#define MAX6900_REG_YR 6 /* year 00-99 */ +#define MAX6900_REG_CT 7 /* control */ + /* register 8 is undocumented */ +#define MAX6900_REG_CENTURY 9 /* century */ +#define MAX6900_REG_LEN 10 + +#define MAX6900_BURST_LEN 8 /* can burst r/w first 8 regs */ + +#define MAX6900_REG_CT_WP (1 << 7) /* Write Protect */ + +/* + * register read/write commands + */ +#define MAX6900_REG_CONTROL_WRITE 0x8e +#define MAX6900_REG_CENTURY_WRITE 0x92 +#define MAX6900_REG_CENTURY_READ 0x93 +#define MAX6900_REG_RESERVED_READ 0x96 +#define MAX6900_REG_BURST_WRITE 0xbe +#define MAX6900_REG_BURST_READ 0xbf + +#define MAX6900_IDLE_TIME_AFTER_WRITE 3 /* specification says 2.5 mS */ + +static struct i2c_driver max6900_driver; + +static int max6900_i2c_read_regs(struct i2c_client *client, u8 *buf) +{ + u8 reg_burst_read[1] = { MAX6900_REG_BURST_READ }; + u8 reg_century_read[1] = { MAX6900_REG_CENTURY_READ }; + struct i2c_msg msgs[4] = { + { + .addr = client->addr, + .flags = 0, /* write */ + .len = sizeof(reg_burst_read), + .buf = reg_burst_read} + , + { + .addr = client->addr, + .flags = I2C_M_RD, + .len = MAX6900_BURST_LEN, + .buf = buf} + , + { + .addr = client->addr, + .flags = 0, /* write */ + .len = sizeof(reg_century_read), + .buf = reg_century_read} + , + { + .addr = client->addr, + .flags = I2C_M_RD, + .len = sizeof(buf[MAX6900_REG_CENTURY]), + .buf = &buf[MAX6900_REG_CENTURY] + } + }; + int rc; + + rc = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, ARRAY_SIZE(msgs)); + if (rc != ARRAY_SIZE(msgs)) { + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: register read failed\n", __func__); + return -EIO; + } + return 0; +} + +static int max6900_i2c_write_regs(struct i2c_client *client, u8 const *buf) +{ + u8 i2c_century_buf[1 + 1] = { MAX6900_REG_CENTURY_WRITE }; + struct i2c_msg century_msgs[1] = { + { + .addr = client->addr, + .flags = 0, /* write */ + .len = sizeof(i2c_century_buf), + .buf = i2c_century_buf} + }; + u8 i2c_burst_buf[MAX6900_BURST_LEN + 1] = { MAX6900_REG_BURST_WRITE }; + struct i2c_msg burst_msgs[1] = { + { + .addr = client->addr, + .flags = 0, /* write */ + .len = sizeof(i2c_burst_buf), + .buf = i2c_burst_buf} + }; + int rc; + + /* + * We have to make separate calls to i2c_transfer because of + * the need to delay after each write to the chip. Also, + * we write the century byte first, since we set the write-protect + * bit as part of the burst write. + */ + i2c_century_buf[1] = buf[MAX6900_REG_CENTURY]; + + rc = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, century_msgs, + ARRAY_SIZE(century_msgs)); + if (rc != ARRAY_SIZE(century_msgs)) + goto write_failed; + + msleep(MAX6900_IDLE_TIME_AFTER_WRITE); + + memcpy(&i2c_burst_buf[1], buf, MAX6900_BURST_LEN); + + rc = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, burst_msgs, ARRAY_SIZE(burst_msgs)); + if (rc != ARRAY_SIZE(burst_msgs)) + goto write_failed; + msleep(MAX6900_IDLE_TIME_AFTER_WRITE); + + return 0; + + write_failed: + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: register write failed\n", __func__); + return -EIO; +} + +static int max6900_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm) +{ + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev); + int rc; + u8 regs[MAX6900_REG_LEN]; + + rc = max6900_i2c_read_regs(client, regs); + if (rc < 0) + return rc; + + tm->tm_sec = bcd2bin(regs[MAX6900_REG_SC]); + tm->tm_min = bcd2bin(regs[MAX6900_REG_MN]); + tm->tm_hour = bcd2bin(regs[MAX6900_REG_HR] & 0x3f); + tm->tm_mday = bcd2bin(regs[MAX6900_REG_DT]); + tm->tm_mon = bcd2bin(regs[MAX6900_REG_MO]) - 1; + tm->tm_year = bcd2bin(regs[MAX6900_REG_YR]) + + bcd2bin(regs[MAX6900_REG_CENTURY]) * 100 - 1900; + tm->tm_wday = bcd2bin(regs[MAX6900_REG_DW]); + + return 0; +} + +static int max6900_i2c_clear_write_protect(struct i2c_client *client) +{ + return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, MAX6900_REG_CONTROL_WRITE, 0); +} + +static int max6900_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm) +{ + struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev); + u8 regs[MAX6900_REG_LEN]; + int rc; + + rc = max6900_i2c_clear_write_protect(client); + if (rc < 0) + return rc; + + regs[MAX6900_REG_SC] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_sec); + regs[MAX6900_REG_MN] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_min); + regs[MAX6900_REG_HR] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_hour); + regs[MAX6900_REG_DT] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_mday); + regs[MAX6900_REG_MO] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_mon + 1); + regs[MAX6900_REG_DW] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_wday); + regs[MAX6900_REG_YR] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_year % 100); + regs[MAX6900_REG_CENTURY] = bin2bcd((tm->tm_year + 1900) / 100); + /* set write protect */ + regs[MAX6900_REG_CT] = MAX6900_REG_CT_WP; + + rc = max6900_i2c_write_regs(client, regs); + if (rc < 0) + return rc; + + return 0; +} + +static const struct rtc_class_ops max6900_rtc_ops = { + .read_time = max6900_rtc_read_time, + .set_time = max6900_rtc_set_time, +}; + +static int max6900_probe(struct i2c_client *client) +{ + struct rtc_device *rtc; + + if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) + return -ENODEV; + + rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&client->dev, max6900_driver.driver.name, + &max6900_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE); + if (IS_ERR(rtc)) + return PTR_ERR(rtc); + + i2c_set_clientdata(client, rtc); + + return 0; +} + +static const struct i2c_device_id max6900_id[] = { + { .name = "max6900" }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, max6900_id); + +static struct i2c_driver max6900_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "rtc-max6900", + }, + .probe = max6900_probe, + .id_table = max6900_id, +}; + +module_i2c_driver(max6900_driver); + +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Maxim MAX6900 RTC driver"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dale Farnsworth <dale@farnsworth.org>"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); |
