kbuild: rust: keep Rust objects out of Clang LTO with inline helpersgrafted

Under `CONFIG_LTO_CLANG` + `CONFIG_RUST_INLINE_HELPERS`, one may hit
`objtool` errors such as:

    vmlinux.o: error: objtool: _R..._3Gsp4boot+0xd6a:
    can't find jump dest instruction at .text._R..._3Gsp4boot+0x1dfd

The reason is that in such builds, the Clang invocation that compiles
the combined Rust plus helpers bitcode emits LLVM bitcode (again) --
the final code generation happens in the linker's LTO step, which the
`-mllvm` trap options passed to Clang do not reach.

This, in turn, means that unreachable traps are missing, and the
impossible paths do not merely fallthrough to the next symbol, but past
the end of their own section, since LTO builds place each function in
its own section.

Thus filter `CC_FLAGS_LTO` out of the Clang invocation, so that it always
emits machine code directly, with the traps in place.

Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
Cc: Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3a2486cc1da5 ("kbuild: rust: provide an option to inline C helpers into Rust")
Acked-by: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260816133233.197500-2-ojeda@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 184 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_numa.c b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..230d5f628
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/of/of_numa.c
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * OF NUMA Parsing support.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 - 2016 Cavium Inc.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "OF: NUMA: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/nodemask.h>
+#include <linux/numa_memblks.h>
+
+#include <asm/numa.h>
+
+/*
+ * Even though we connect cpus to numa domains later in SMP
+ * init, we need to know the node ids now for all cpus.
+*/
+static void __init of_numa_parse_cpu_nodes(void)
+{
+	u32 nid;
+	int r;
+	struct device_node *np;
+
+	for_each_of_cpu_node(np) {
+		r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid);
+		if (r)
+			continue;
+
+		pr_debug("CPU on %u\n", nid);
+		if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES)
+			pr_warn("Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
+		else
+			node_set(nid, numa_nodes_parsed);
+	}
+}
+
+static int __init of_numa_parse_memory_nodes(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np = NULL;
+	struct resource rsrc;
+	u32 nid;
+	int i, r = -EINVAL;
+
+	for_each_node_by_type(np, "memory") {
+		r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid);
+		if (r == -EINVAL)
+			/*
+			 * property doesn't exist if -EINVAL, continue
+			 * looking for more memory nodes with
+			 * "numa-node-id" property
+			 */
+			continue;
+
+		if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
+			pr_warn("Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
+			r = -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		for (i = 0; !r && !of_address_to_resource(np, i, &rsrc); i++)
+			r = numa_add_memblk(nid, rsrc.start, rsrc.end + 1);
+
+		if (!i || r) {
+			of_node_put(np);
+			pr_err("bad property in memory node\n");
+			return r ? : -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return r;
+}
+
+static int __init of_numa_parse_distance_map_v1(struct device_node *map)
+{
+	const __be32 *matrix;
+	int entry_count;
+	int i;
+
+	pr_info("parsing numa-distance-map-v1\n");
+
+	matrix = of_get_property(map, "distance-matrix", NULL);
+	if (!matrix) {
+		pr_err("No distance-matrix property in distance-map\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	entry_count = of_property_count_u32_elems(map, "distance-matrix");
+	if (entry_count <= 0) {
+		pr_err("Invalid distance-matrix\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i + 2 < entry_count; i += 3) {
+		u32 nodea, nodeb, distance;
+
+		nodea = of_read_number(matrix, 1);
+		matrix++;
+		nodeb = of_read_number(matrix, 1);
+		matrix++;
+		distance = of_read_number(matrix, 1);
+		matrix++;
+
+		if ((nodea == nodeb && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE) ||
+		    (nodea != nodeb && distance <= LOCAL_DISTANCE)) {
+			pr_err("Invalid distance[node%d -> node%d] = %d\n",
+			       nodea, nodeb, distance);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		node_set(nodea, numa_nodes_parsed);
+
+		numa_set_distance(nodea, nodeb, distance);
+
+		/* Set default distance of node B->A same as A->B */
+		if (nodeb > nodea)
+			numa_set_distance(nodeb, nodea, distance);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init of_numa_parse_distance_map(void)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct device_node *np;
+
+	np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
+				     "numa-distance-map-v1");
+	if (np)
+		ret = of_numa_parse_distance_map_v1(np);
+
+	of_node_put(np);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *device)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+	u32 nid;
+	int r = -ENODATA;
+
+	np = of_node_get(device);
+
+	while (np) {
+		r = of_property_read_u32(np, "numa-node-id", &nid);
+		/*
+		 * -EINVAL indicates the property was not found, and
+		 *  we walk up the tree trying to find a parent with a
+		 *  "numa-node-id".  Any other type of error indicates
+		 *  a bad device tree and we give up.
+		 */
+		if (r != -EINVAL)
+			break;
+
+		np = of_get_next_parent(np);
+	}
+	if (np && r)
+		pr_warn("Invalid \"numa-node-id\" property in node %pOFn\n",
+			np);
+	of_node_put(np);
+
+	/*
+	 * If numa=off passed on command line, or with a defective
+	 * device tree, the nid may not be in the set of possible
+	 * nodes.  Check for this case and return NUMA_NO_NODE.
+	 */
+	if (!r && nid < MAX_NUMNODES && node_possible(nid))
+		return nid;
+
+	return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+}
+
+int __init of_numa_init(void)
+{
+	int r;
+
+	of_numa_parse_cpu_nodes();
+	r = of_numa_parse_memory_nodes();
+	if (r)
+		return r;
+	return of_numa_parse_distance_map();
+}