summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/md/dm-vdo/funnel-queue.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>2026-09-21 17:37:22 -0700
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2026-09-22 10:49:53 +0200
commit0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6 (patch)
tree176dc2d685debcfb082c151ee94f2425ac96b364 /drivers/md/dm-vdo/funnel-queue.c
downloadlinux-stable-0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6.tar.gz
linux-stable-0d6526f82c3cdefcca47f73f5fc08dc6f335eac6.zip
sched/cache: Keep nr_pref_llc_running in the runnable domain, to fix LLC mis-scheduling buggrafted
alb_break_llc() decides whether to break LLC preference during active load balance. It does so by testing that every runnable fair task on the source rq prefers its LLC: env->src_rq->nr_pref_llc_running == env->src_rq->cfs.h_nr_runnable But the two counters cover different sets. nr_pref_llc_running is updated in account_llc_enqueue()/account_llc_dequeue(), next to cfs_rq->nr_queued, so it follows queued tasks. h_nr_runnable is updated in set_delayed()/ clear_delayed() and drops delay-dequeued tasks. So under DELAY_DEQUEUE, a preferring task that goes to sleep stays counted in nr_pref_llc_running while h_nr_runnable falls. The equality then breaks, alb_break_llc() returns false, and active balance is free to pull a task off its preferred LLC. Active balance only moves runnable tasks, and this is the only LLC check it consults: once the stopper runs, LBF_ACTIVE_LB skips the per-task test in can_migrate_task(). The runnable set is the one we want. Fix it on the counter side. A task should be counted in nr_pref_llc_running exactly while it is both queued on its preferred LLC (pref_llc_queued) and runnable (!sched_delayed). Define that membership once in task_pref_llc_runnable(), and adjust the counter only through pref_llc_running_inc()/pref_llc_running_dec() from the four sites that change either input: account_llc_enqueue(), account_llc_dequeue(), set_delayed() and clear_delayed(). Gating every update on the same predicate keeps the delay, wake and dequeue paths from double-counting or underflowing; see the comments at those sites for the ordering. nr_llc_running and sd->llc_counts are not touched and stay on queued semantics. Fixes: 714059f79ff0 ("sched/cache: Handle moving single tasks to/from their preferred LLC") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260827135000.735138-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com/ Reported-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com> Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # v7.2.x Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06af61afedac32e6477f57feb4d658f6c411c3af.1790035273.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/md/dm-vdo/funnel-queue.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/md/dm-vdo/funnel-queue.c170
1 files changed, 170 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-vdo/funnel-queue.c b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/funnel-queue.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7011963c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-vdo/funnel-queue.c
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright 2023 Red Hat
+ */
+
+#include "funnel-queue.h"
+
+#include "cpu.h"
+#include "memory-alloc.h"
+#include "permassert.h"
+
+int vdo_make_funnel_queue(struct funnel_queue **queue_ptr)
+{
+ int result;
+ struct funnel_queue *queue;
+
+ result = vdo_allocate(1, "funnel queue", &queue);
+ if (result != VDO_SUCCESS)
+ return result;
+
+ /*
+ * Initialize the stub entry and put it in the queue, establishing the invariant that
+ * queue->newest and queue->oldest are never null.
+ */
+ queue->stub.next = NULL;
+ queue->newest = &queue->stub;
+ queue->oldest = &queue->stub;
+
+ *queue_ptr = queue;
+ return VDO_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+void vdo_free_funnel_queue(struct funnel_queue *queue)
+{
+ vdo_free(queue);
+}
+
+static struct funnel_queue_entry *get_oldest(struct funnel_queue *queue)
+{
+ /*
+ * Barrier requirements: We need a read barrier between reading a "next" field pointer
+ * value and reading anything it points to. There's an accompanying barrier in
+ * vdo_funnel_queue_put() between its caller setting up the entry and making it visible.
+ */
+ struct funnel_queue_entry *oldest = queue->oldest;
+ struct funnel_queue_entry *next = READ_ONCE(oldest->next);
+
+ if (oldest == &queue->stub) {
+ /*
+ * When the oldest entry is the stub and it has no successor, the queue is
+ * logically empty.
+ */
+ if (next == NULL)
+ return NULL;
+ /*
+ * The stub entry has a successor, so the stub can be dequeued and ignored without
+ * breaking the queue invariants.
+ */
+ oldest = next;
+ queue->oldest = oldest;
+ next = READ_ONCE(oldest->next);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We have a non-stub candidate to dequeue. If it lacks a successor, we'll need to put the
+ * stub entry back on the queue first.
+ */
+ if (next == NULL) {
+ struct funnel_queue_entry *newest = READ_ONCE(queue->newest);
+
+ if (oldest != newest) {
+ /*
+ * Another thread has already swung queue->newest atomically, but not yet
+ * assigned previous->next. The queue is really still empty.
+ */
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Put the stub entry back on the queue, ensuring a successor will eventually be
+ * seen.
+ */
+ vdo_funnel_queue_put(queue, &queue->stub);
+
+ /* Check again for a successor. */
+ next = READ_ONCE(oldest->next);
+ if (next == NULL) {
+ /*
+ * We lost a race with a producer who swapped queue->newest before we did,
+ * but who hasn't yet updated previous->next. Try again later.
+ */
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return oldest;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Poll a queue, removing the oldest entry if the queue is not empty. This function must only be
+ * called from a single consumer thread.
+ */
+struct funnel_queue_entry *vdo_funnel_queue_poll(struct funnel_queue *queue)
+{
+ struct funnel_queue_entry *oldest = get_oldest(queue);
+
+ if (oldest == NULL)
+ return oldest;
+
+ /*
+ * Dequeue the oldest entry and return it. Only one consumer thread may call this function,
+ * so no locking, atomic operations, or fences are needed; queue->oldest is owned by the
+ * consumer and oldest->next is never used by a producer thread after it is swung from NULL
+ * to non-NULL.
+ */
+ queue->oldest = READ_ONCE(oldest->next);
+ /*
+ * Make sure the caller sees the proper stored data for this entry. Since we've already
+ * fetched the entry pointer we stored in "queue->oldest", this also ensures that on entry
+ * to the next call we'll properly see the dependent data.
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
+ /*
+ * If "oldest" is a very light-weight work item, we'll be looking for the next one very
+ * soon, so prefetch it now.
+ */
+ uds_prefetch_address(queue->oldest, true);
+ WRITE_ONCE(oldest->next, NULL);
+ return oldest;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check whether the funnel queue is empty or not. If the queue is in a transition state with one
+ * or more entries being added such that the list view is incomplete, this function will report the
+ * queue as empty.
+ */
+bool vdo_is_funnel_queue_empty(struct funnel_queue *queue)
+{
+ return get_oldest(queue) == NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check whether the funnel queue is idle or not. If the queue has entries available to be
+ * retrieved, it is not idle. If the queue is in a transition state with one or more entries being
+ * added such that the list view is incomplete, it may not be possible to retrieve an entry with
+ * the vdo_funnel_queue_poll() function, but the queue will not be considered idle.
+ */
+bool vdo_is_funnel_queue_idle(struct funnel_queue *queue)
+{
+ /*
+ * Oldest is not the stub, so there's another entry, though if next is NULL we can't
+ * retrieve it yet.
+ */
+ if (queue->oldest != &queue->stub)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
+ * Oldest is the stub, but newest has been updated by _put(); either there's another,
+ * retrievable entry in the list, or the list is officially empty but in the intermediate
+ * state of having an entry added.
+ *
+ * Whether anything is retrievable depends on whether stub.next has been updated and become
+ * visible to us, but for idleness we don't care. And due to memory ordering in _put(), the
+ * update to newest would be visible to us at the same time or sooner.
+ */
+ if (READ_ONCE(queue->newest) != &queue->stub)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}