scftorture: Count single_rpc offline failures in statistics outputgrafted

scf_torture_stats_print() aggregates each invoker thread's counters
into a local scf_statistics structure before printing, but the
n_single_rpc_ofl field is missing from the aggregation loop.  As a
result, the "single_rpc_ofl" value printed in the statistics line is
always zero, even when smp_call_function_single() invocations for the
RPC test have failed due to offline CPUs and been counted by the
invoker threads.

Add the missing accumulation so that the printed value reflects the
actual counts.

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-cache-background-tracker.h b/drivers/md/dm-cache-background-tracker.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..47156c14a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-background-tracker.h
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Red Hat. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This file is released under the GPL.
+ */
+
+#ifndef DM_CACHE_BACKGROUND_WORK_H
+#define DM_CACHE_BACKGROUND_WORK_H
+
+#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include "dm-cache-policy.h"
+
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+/*
+ * The cache policy decides what background work should be performed,
+ * such as promotions, demotions and writebacks. The core cache target
+ * is in charge of performing the work, and does so when it sees fit.
+ *
+ * The background_tracker acts as a go between. Keeping track of future
+ * work that the policy has decided upon, and handing (issuing) it to
+ * the core target when requested.
+ *
+ * There is no locking in this, so calls will probably need to be
+ * protected with a spinlock.
+ */
+
+struct bt_work {
+	struct list_head list;
+	struct rb_node node;
+	struct policy_work work;
+};
+
+extern struct kmem_cache *btracker_work_cache;
+
+struct background_work;
+struct background_tracker;
+
+/*
+ * Create a new tracker, it will not be able to queue more than
+ * 'max_work' entries.
+ */
+struct background_tracker *btracker_create(unsigned int max_work);
+
+/*
+ * Destroy the tracker. No issued, but not complete, work should
+ * exist when this is called. It is fine to have queued but unissued
+ * work.
+ */
+void btracker_destroy(struct background_tracker *b);
+
+unsigned int btracker_nr_demotions_queued(struct background_tracker *b);
+
+/*
+ * Queue some work within the tracker. 'work' should point to the work
+ * to queue, this will be copied (ownership doesn't pass).  If pwork
+ * is not NULL then it will be set to point to the tracker's internal
+ * copy of the work.
+ *
+ * returns -EINVAL iff the work is already queued.  -ENOMEM if the work
+ * couldn't be queued for another reason.
+ */
+int btracker_queue(struct background_tracker *b,
+		   struct policy_work *work,
+		   struct policy_work **pwork);
+
+/*
+ * Hands out the next piece of work to be performed.
+ * Returns -ENODATA if there's no work.
+ */
+int btracker_issue(struct background_tracker *b, struct policy_work **work);
+
+/*
+ * Informs the tracker that the work has been completed and it may forget
+ * about it.
+ */
+void btracker_complete(struct background_tracker *b, struct policy_work *op);
+
+/*
+ * Predicate to see if an origin block is already scheduled for promotion.
+ */
+bool btracker_promotion_already_present(struct background_tracker *b,
+					dm_oblock_t oblock);
+
+/*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
+
+#endif