summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpio/gpio-rdc321x.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>2026-09-02 15:31:14 -0700
committerKees Cook <kees@kernel.org>2026-09-04 21:37:00 -0700
commit3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d (patch)
treec65086f9bdcd48c6360fb7cb4598bca084da1f32 /drivers/gpio/gpio-rdc321x.c
downloadlinux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.tar.gz
linux-stable-3a2c4d55e32ad65efebdb6de44eef3bfa08bb49d.zip
treewide: refresh kmalloc_obj() conversionsgrafted
This is another run of the Coccinelle script for converting kmalloc() family of allocations to kmalloc_obj() via the existing rules in scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci This catches both the set of kmalloc() uses added since the first kmalloc_obj() conversions in v7.0 and adds a large group missed in the first pass due to Coccinelle not interacting well with the cleanup.h scoped_...() family of macros[1]. I worked around this with spatch's "--macro-file" argument to a file with all the scoped_...() macros mapped to Coccinelle's YACFE_ITERATOR[2] as that was the closest viable control flow indicator I could find. Build tested allmodconfig on x86, arm64, arm, loongarch, mips, powerpc, riscv, and s390 with no new warnings. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202609021314.8A9C0B8@keescook/ [1] Link: https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/master/standard.h [2] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees+treewide@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpio/gpio-rdc321x.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpio/gpio-rdc321x.c199
1 files changed, 199 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rdc321x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rdc321x.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ba62b81aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rdc321x.c
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * RDC321x GPIO driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2008, Volker Weiss <dev@tintuc.de>
+ * Copyright (C) 2007-2010 Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
+ */
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/rdc321x.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+struct rdc321x_gpio {
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ struct pci_dev *sb_pdev;
+ u32 data_reg[2];
+ int reg1_ctrl_base;
+ int reg1_data_base;
+ int reg2_ctrl_base;
+ int reg2_data_base;
+ struct gpio_chip chip;
+};
+
+/* read GPIO pin */
+static int rdc_gpio_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
+{
+ struct rdc321x_gpio *gpch;
+ u32 value = 0;
+ int reg;
+
+ gpch = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ reg = gpio < 32 ? gpch->reg1_data_base : gpch->reg2_data_base;
+
+ spin_lock(&gpch->lock);
+ pci_write_config_dword(gpch->sb_pdev, reg,
+ gpch->data_reg[gpio < 32 ? 0 : 1]);
+ pci_read_config_dword(gpch->sb_pdev, reg, &value);
+ spin_unlock(&gpch->lock);
+
+ return (1 << (gpio & 0x1f)) & value ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
+static void rdc_gpio_set_value_impl(struct gpio_chip *chip,
+ unsigned gpio, int value)
+{
+ struct rdc321x_gpio *gpch;
+ int reg = (gpio < 32) ? 0 : 1;
+
+ gpch = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+ if (value)
+ gpch->data_reg[reg] |= 1 << (gpio & 0x1f);
+ else
+ gpch->data_reg[reg] &= ~(1 << (gpio & 0x1f));
+
+ pci_write_config_dword(gpch->sb_pdev,
+ reg ? gpch->reg2_data_base : gpch->reg1_data_base,
+ gpch->data_reg[reg]);
+}
+
+/* set GPIO pin to value */
+static int rdc_gpio_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio,
+ int value)
+{
+ struct rdc321x_gpio *gpch;
+
+ gpch = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+ spin_lock(&gpch->lock);
+ rdc_gpio_set_value_impl(chip, gpio, value);
+ spin_unlock(&gpch->lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int rdc_gpio_config(struct gpio_chip *chip,
+ unsigned gpio, int value)
+{
+ struct rdc321x_gpio *gpch;
+ int err;
+ u32 reg;
+
+ gpch = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+ spin_lock(&gpch->lock);
+ err = pci_read_config_dword(gpch->sb_pdev, gpio < 32 ?
+ gpch->reg1_ctrl_base : gpch->reg2_ctrl_base, &reg);
+ if (err)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ reg |= 1 << (gpio & 0x1f);
+
+ err = pci_write_config_dword(gpch->sb_pdev, gpio < 32 ?
+ gpch->reg1_ctrl_base : gpch->reg2_ctrl_base, reg);
+ if (err)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ rdc_gpio_set_value_impl(chip, gpio, value);
+
+unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&gpch->lock);
+
+ return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
+}
+
+/* configure GPIO pin as input */
+static int rdc_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
+{
+ return rdc_gpio_config(chip, gpio, 1);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Cache the initial value of both GPIO data registers
+ */
+static int rdc321x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ int err;
+ struct resource *r;
+ struct rdc321x_gpio *rdc321x_gpio_dev;
+ struct rdc321x_gpio_pdata *pdata;
+
+ pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!pdata) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no platform data supplied\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct rdc321x_gpio),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rdc321x_gpio_dev)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ r = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO, "gpio-reg1");
+ if (!r) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get gpio-reg1 resource\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock_init(&rdc321x_gpio_dev->lock);
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->sb_pdev = pdata->sb_pdev;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->reg1_ctrl_base = r->start;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->reg1_data_base = r->start + 0x4;
+
+ r = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO, "gpio-reg2");
+ if (!r) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get gpio-reg2 resource\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->reg2_ctrl_base = r->start;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->reg2_data_base = r->start + 0x4;
+
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.label = "rdc321x-gpio";
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.direction_input = rdc_gpio_direction_input;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.direction_output = rdc_gpio_config;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.get = rdc_gpio_get_value;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.set = rdc_gpio_set_value;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.base = 0;
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.ngpio = pdata->max_gpios;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rdc321x_gpio_dev);
+
+ /* This might not be, what others (BIOS, bootloader, etc.)
+ wrote to these registers before, but it's a good guess. Still
+ better than just using 0xffffffff. */
+ err = pci_read_config_dword(rdc321x_gpio_dev->sb_pdev,
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->reg1_data_base,
+ &rdc321x_gpio_dev->data_reg[0]);
+ if (err)
+ return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
+
+ err = pci_read_config_dword(rdc321x_gpio_dev->sb_pdev,
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->reg2_data_base,
+ &rdc321x_gpio_dev->data_reg[1]);
+ if (err)
+ return pcibios_err_to_errno(err);
+
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "registering %d GPIOs\n",
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip.ngpio);
+ return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &rdc321x_gpio_dev->chip,
+ rdc321x_gpio_dev);
+}
+
+static struct platform_driver rdc321x_gpio_driver = {
+ .driver.name = "rdc321x-gpio",
+ .probe = rdc321x_gpio_probe,
+};
+
+module_platform_driver(rdc321x_gpio_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("RDC321x GPIO driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:rdc321x-gpio");